Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Joint analysis of anisotropic power spectrum, bispectrum and trispectrum: application to N-body simulations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.03976 v2 pith:KA2OMUFN submitted 2021-04-08 astro-ph.CO

Joint analysis of anisotropic power spectrum, bispectrum and trispectrum: application to N-body simulations

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords mathrmbispectrumanalysismonopoleparameterspowerredshiftspectrum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We perform for the first time a joint analysis of the monopole and quadrupoles for power spectrum, bispectrum and integrated trispectrum (i-trispectrum) from the redshift space matter field in N-body simulations. With a full Markov Chain Monte Carlo exploration of the posterior distribution, we quantify the constraints on cosmological parameters for an object density of $n_\mathrm{p}=5\times10^{-4} (h\,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1})^{3}$, redshift $z=0.5$, and a covariance corresponding to a survey volume of $V_\mathrm{survey} =25\,(h^{-1}\mathrm{Gpc})^3$, a set up which is representative of forthcoming galaxy redshift surveys. We demonstrate the complementarity of the bispectrum and i-trispectrum in constraining key cosmological parameters. In particular, compared to the state-of-the-art power spectrum (monopole plus quadrupole) and bispectrum (monopole) analyses, we find 1D $68\%$ credible regions smaller by a factor of $(72\%,78\%,72\%,47\%,46\%)$ for the parameters $(f,\sigma_8,f_\mathrm{nl},\alpha_\parallel,\alpha_\perp)$ respectively. This work motivates the additional effort necessary to include the redshift-space anisotropic signal of higher-order statistics in the analysis and interpretation of ongoing and future galaxy surveys.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Disentangling modified gravity and galaxy bias with field-level inference

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    With fixed known initial phases, voxel-by-voxel Poisson likelihood on the galaxy number-counts field breaks the f(R)–bias degeneracy that power spectra cannot resolve, with voids and walls driving the gain.

  2. Learning Cosmology from Nearest Neighbour Statistics

    astro-ph.CO 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0

    Nearest-neighbour distance maps, combined with kNN-CDFs in a hybrid neural network, constrain Ωm and σ8 from Quijote halos with R2=0.80 and 0.93, matching or beating point-cloud methods at a fraction of the compute.

  3. Constraining primordial non-Gaussianity from DESI DR1 quasars and Planck PR4 CMB Lensing

    astro-ph.CO 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Cross-correlation of DESI DR1 quasars with Planck PR4 CMB lensing constrains local f_NL to 2^{+28}_{-34} (p=1.6) or 6^{+20}_{-24} (p=1.0), tightening previous limits by 35%.