Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 132 references

Field-level analysis of the full galaxy map breaks the modified-gravity/bias degeneracy that power spectra cannot resolve.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-12 01:56 UTC pith:UGCNLM57

load-bearing objection Clean controlled demo that field-level Poisson on n_g breaks the f(R)–β degeneracy under known phases; the idealisation is already their stated limit. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.03514 v1 pith:UGCNLM57 submitted 2026-07-03 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

Disentangling modified gravity and galaxy bias with field-level inference

classification astro-ph.CO gr-qc
keywords field-level inferencemodified gravityf(R) gravitygalaxy biaslarge-scale structurecosmic webCOLAFourier phases
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Power-spectrum analyses of galaxy clustering cannot cleanly separate the effects of modified gravity from those of galaxy bias, because both can raise or lower clustering amplitude on similar scales. This paper shows that comparing the full three-dimensional galaxy number-count field, voxel by voxel, recovers the missing non-Gaussian and Fourier-phase information and thereby breaks the degeneracy. On controlled mocks with known initial conditions, the field-level Poisson likelihood returns substantially tighter, unbiased constraints on both the Hu–Sawicki parameter |f_R0| and the leading bias parameter β than a power-spectrum analysis of the same data. Under-dense regions (voids and walls) supply most of the distinguishing power. The result is a concrete demonstration that next-generation surveys can test gravity more sharply once the entire map, rather than its two-point summary, is used.

Core claim

When initial phases are fixed and known, a Bayesian Poisson likelihood evaluated on the three-dimensional galaxy number-count field jointly constrains |f_R0| and the primary bias parameter β more tightly than a Gaussian power-spectrum likelihood and, crucially, breaks the strong degeneracy between the two parameters that is inherent to two-point statistics.

What carries the argument

The full-field Poisson likelihood: each voxel is treated as an independent Poisson draw whose mean is the predicted galaxy count under a given (f_R0, β) model; the global log-likelihood is simply the sum over all voxels, thereby retaining both Fourier amplitudes and phases.

Load-bearing premise

The initial phases of the dark-matter density field are assumed known and fixed; the paper itself notes that marginalising over them on real data is expected to remove the pure-phase information that currently breaks the degeneracy.

What would settle it

Repeat the identical mock analysis after freely sampling the initial phases (or after replacing the fixed-phase COLA realisations with a full Bayesian reconstruction that marginalises over them) and check whether the |f_R0|–β degeneracy reappears at the power-spectrum level of width.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Stage-IV surveys can extract substantially tighter joint constraints on gravity and bias by analysing the three-dimensional galaxy field rather than power spectra alone.
  • Cosmic-web classifiers applied to the underlying density field can isolate which environments (especially voids and walls) drive gravity constraints.
  • Phase information alone already prefers the correct |f_R0|; combining it with amplitudes yields the tightest joint posteriors.
  • The same pipeline is modular and can incorporate field-level emulators, more complete bias models, weak lensing, and redshift-space distortions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Once initial phases must be marginalised, residual field-level gains will come mainly from non-Gaussian amplitude information rather than pure morphology, so hybrid likelihoods that keep higher-order moments may still outperform pure two-point analyses.
  • The finding that n_g = 1 voxels in voids/walls are the most informative suggests that carefully selected void and wall catalogues could serve as cheaper, partially field-level probes even before full map-level inference is routine.
  • Because the degeneracy-breaking is environment-dependent, any residual screening or assembly-bias mismodelling will appear first as spatially coherent residuals in under-dense regions, giving a practical diagnostic for model misspecification.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a field-level Bayesian inference pipeline that evaluates a Poisson likelihood directly on the 3D galaxy number-counts field n_g, jointly constraining the Hu–Sawicki |f_R0| and the primary local bias parameter β. Dark-matter fields are generated with MG-extended COLA under fixed initial phases; galaxies are painted with a four-parameter non-linear bias model (only β free, N retuned to keep N_tot fixed). On controlled mocks the full-field analysis yields tighter, less degenerate posteriors than a Gaussian power-spectrum likelihood (Table 1, Fig. 2), isolates the contribution of Fourier phases (§5.4), attributes most of the gain to under-dense voxels via cosmic-web classification (§5.3), and demonstrates robustness to Poisson seeds, initial-condition realisations and number-count thresholding (§6).

Significance. If the controlled demonstration holds, the work supplies a concrete, reproducible illustration that non-Gaussian morphology and phase information can break the classic MG–bias degeneracy that limits two-point analyses. The explicit phase-only versus amplitude-only comparison, the voxel-level likelihood decomposition, and the suite of 100 Poisson + 5 IC robustness tests are genuine strengths that make the result falsifiable and useful for Stage-IV survey forecasts. The transparent scoping to fixed known phases (already flagged by the authors) keeps the claim honest while still charting a path toward BORG-style marginalisation and field-level emulators.

major comments (3)
  1. §5.4 and §7 correctly note that pure-phase information vanishes once initial phases are marginalised, yet the abstract and the final sentence of the conclusions still present the degeneracy-breaking result as a “powerful path forward for au next-generation surveys” without quantifying residual constraining power from non-Gaussian amplitudes alone. A short forecast (or at least a clear statement) of what survives after phase marginalisation is needed for the claim to remain load-bearing outside the idealised setting.
  2. §2.3 and §3.1 fix ρ and ε at the Jasche & Lavaux (2019) values and only vary β (with N retuned). Because the exponential void-suppression term is precisely the piece that couples most strongly to the under-dense voxels identified as the main drivers in §5.3, the reported degeneracy breaking may be optimistic relative to a fully free local (or non-local) bias model. At minimum the authors should show one additional run in which ρ and ε are also free, or justify why the present restriction does not affect the central comparison.
  3. The COLA implementation (§2.2) uses a modest number of time-steps and a linear-field screening approximation. Under-dense regions, which dominate the likelihood ratios in Tables 2–5, are exactly where chameleon screening is weakest and residual force errors are largest. A quantitative comparison of the FML-COLA density field against a full N-body MG run (or a published accuracy benchmark at the same resolution) for the void/wall voxels that drive the constraints would strengthen the claim that the reported |f_R0| posteriors are not resolution artefacts.
minor comments (5)
  1. Fig. 1 (right) correlation matrix and Fig. 3 power-spectrum ratios would benefit from explicit k-bin labels or a second x-axis in h Mpc^{-1} so that the scale dependence of the residual degeneracy is immediately readable.
  2. Eq. (3) and the surrounding text use both n_g and n_g interchangeably; a single consistent notation for the expected galaxy count field would improve readability.
  3. The Percival correction is cited (Percival et al. 2022) but the numerical value of the factor F applied to the 1024-realisation covariance is never stated; a one-line addition in §3.2.1 would aid reproducibility.
  4. Several sentences in the abstract and introduction still contain concatenated words (“Wepresentafield-level ldots”, “Non-linearstructureformation ldots”); these are residual typesetting artefacts that should be cleaned.
  5. Table 1 reports 95 % upper limits for the GR case and 68 % intervals for F6; a uniform confidence level (or an explicit note) would make the comparison cleaner.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: controlled mock comparison of two likelihoods under fixed known phases is self-contained and does not reduce any claim to its inputs by construction.

full rationale

The paper's central demonstration is a side-by-side Bayesian comparison, on the same fixed-seed COLA mocks, of a Gaussian power-spectrum likelihood versus a voxel-wise Poisson field-level likelihood for the joint parameters (β, |f_R0|). Fiducial bias parameters are taken from the external literature (Neyrinck et al. 2014; Jasche & Lavaux 2019 row 11) and held fixed except for the free parameter β; N is retuned solely to keep N_tot constant so that likelihood differences arise only from spatial morphology. No quantity is fitted to a subset of the mock data and then re-labelled a prediction. The phase-only versus amplitude-only tests (Sec. 5.4) and the cosmic-web voxel attribution (Sec. 5.3) are diagnostic analyses of the same likelihood surface, not circular redefinitions. Self-citations (e.g., Hoyland et al. 2025 COLA weak-lensing, Saadeh et al. emulators) appear only in the outlook and are not load-bearing for the reported constraints. The fixed-phase idealisation is explicitly scoped as a limitation (abstract, Sec. 5.4, Sec. 7) rather than hidden. Consequently the derivation chain does not collapse to its inputs by construction, by self-citation, or by renaming.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard cosmological simulation tools, a literature bias model, and the deliberate idealisation of fixed initial phases. No new physical entities are introduced; free parameters are the usual MG and bias coefficients plus a few fixed nuisance values taken from prior work. The ledger is therefore short and transparent.

free parameters (4)
  • β (primary galaxy bias)
    Varied jointly with |f_R0|; fiducial value 0.77 taken from Jasche & Lavaux (2019) table 2 row 11 and recovered in the inference.
  • |f_R0| (Hu–Sawicki strength)
    Primary MG parameter; sampled on a logarithmic grid from 10^{-8} to 10^{-4} plus GR.
  • N, ρ, ε (remaining bias parameters)
    Fixed to literature values (N=0.19, ρ=1.61, ε=0.09); N is further re-tuned per (β,|f_R0|) pair to keep total galaxy number constant. These choices affect the likelihood surface.
  • Background cosmology (Ω_m, σ_8, _s, _s, h, _s)
    Fixed to Planck 2014 values; not varied.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Galaxy counts in each voxel are independent Poisson draws given the mean predicted by the bias model.
    Used for both full-field and truncated likelihoods (§3.2.2–3.2.3).
  • domain assumption COLA (FML-COLA) with the stated resolution and 2LPT initial conditions is sufficiently accurate for the scales analysed.
    Forward model for all δ_DM fields (§2.2, §3.1).
  • domain assumption The Neyrinck et al. (2014) local-in-density bias model with three parameters fixed is an adequate description of the galaxy–matter relation for this proof-of-concept.
    Eq. 3; authors note non-locality/stochasticity left for future work.
  • ad hoc to paper Initial Gaussian phases are known and identical for all models and the mock data.
    Explicit experimental control that enables the phase-only test and the reported degeneracy breaking; acknowledged as unrealistic for real data (§5.4, §7).

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 35405 in / 2900 out tokens · 26212 ms · 2026-07-12T01:56:48.636671+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a field-level inference framework for testing gravity with the large-scale structure that exploits the full information content of the galaxy distribution. Traditional analyses based on the power spectrum discard non-Gaussian and Fourier phase information, resulting in strong degeneracies between modified gravity (MG) and galaxy bias. Our approach overcomes this limitation by performing a Bayesian likelihood analysis directly on the three-dimensional galaxy number counts field, jointly constraining MG and bias parameters using both amplitudes and phases. As an illustrative application, we analyse mock data in the context of the $f(R)$ theory of gravity and a non-linear galaxy bias model. Non-linear structure formation is modelled using the COmoving Lagrangian Acceleration (COLA) method under different gravity strengths, parameterised by $f_{R0}$. The resulting dark matter fields are then mapped to mock galaxy catalogues via a non-linear bias prescription. We demonstrate that, with fixed and known initial phases, including non-Gaussian and phase information yields tighter constraints on both $f_{R0}$ and the primary bias parameter, $\beta$, relative to the power-spectrum-only analyses. Notably, the field-level approach breaks the degeneracies between MG and galaxy bias inherent to two-point statistics. Through a cosmic web classification into voids, walls, filaments and clusters, we find that under-dense regions are the primary drivers in distinguishing gravity models at the field level. Finally, we establish the robustness of our pipeline against variations in initial conditions, Poisson noise, and galaxy field thresholding, providing a powerful path forward for field-level tests of gravity with next-generation surveys.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.03514 by Daniela Saadeh, Harry Desmond, Kazuya Koyama, Sophie Hoyland.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: The galaxy power spectrum, 𝑃g (𝑘), for the GR fiducial model. We show the noiseless theoretical prediction, 𝑃 fid g (𝑘), with 1𝜎 uncertainties estimated from the diagonal of the covariance matrix, C, of 𝑁mock = 1024 independent Poisson-sampled realisations (solid line with error bars). We compare this against the power spectrum measured from the noisy mock data field, 𝑃 obs g (𝑘) (dashed line), and t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison of constraints on 𝛽 and log10 | 𝑓𝑅0 | obtained with the power spectra of the galaxy number count, 𝑃g (𝑘), and the full-field analysis, 𝑛g. The former uses the Gaussian likelihood in Eq. 8, whereas the latter employs the Poisson likelihood in Eq. 11. Left: GR fiducial mock (true values: log10 | 𝑓𝑅0 | = −∞, 𝛽 = 0.77; prior ranges: 𝛽 ∈ [0.75, 0.80], log10 | 𝑓𝑅0 | ∈ [−8, −4]); Right: F6 fiducial moc… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Ratio of the predicted galaxy power spectra, 𝑃g (𝑘), relative to the fiducial 𝑃 fid g (𝑘), for models indicative of increasing/decreasing galaxy bias (filled/hollow stars, respectively), increasing gravity strength (triangles), and a degeneracy-line model (circles). The specific marker shapes and fills used in this figure exactly match the corresponding models shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p0… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Distribution of the fiducial mean galaxy counts, 𝑛 fid g , for given observed integer counts, 𝑛 obs g , in the GR fiducial. The distributions show that voxels with 𝑛 obs g ≥ 1 are predominantly drawn from low-density regions where 𝑛 fid g < 1. This confirms that the Poisson noise frequently increases the galaxy count within low-density regions of the fiducial model (𝑛 fid g < 1) into the 𝑛 obs g ≥ 1 regime… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Visualisation of a 2D slice through the simulation volume for GR and F6 fiducial models. Top row: The GR fiducial dataset, showing the DM overdensity, 𝛿 GR DM (left), the cosmic web classification according to 𝛿 GR DM (middle), and the corresponding galaxy number counts field 𝑛 obs,GR g (right). Bottom row: The F6 fiducial dataset, showing the difference in DM overdensity relative to GR, Δ𝛿DM = 𝛿 F6 DM − 𝛿… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: GR fiducial. Slice of the DM density field showing the classification of voxels as voids (left) and walls (right). Lighter regions show the respective cosmic web classification, while darker shaded regions are outside of these structures. Galaxies with 𝑛 obs g = 1 inside the structures are shown in orange, and voxels with 𝑛g = 1 outside voids are shown in black. This figure demonstrates the voxels contribu… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Constraints on 𝛽 and | 𝑓𝑅0 | obtained by isolating the information content of the Fourier phases for the GR fiducial model (left) and the F6 fiducial model (right). We compare these phase-only constraints (blue) to amplitude-only constraints from the power spectrum using the full field, 𝑃g (𝑘) (yellow), and combined phase + amplitudes constraints obtained with the full-field analysis of 𝑛 obs g ≥ 1 voxels … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Constraint on 𝛽 and | 𝑓𝑅0 | derived from the full 𝑛 obs g field and cases where a threshold, 𝑇, is applied. Left: GR fiducial, where thresholds on 𝑛 obs g are 𝑇 = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Right: F6 fiducial, where thresholds on 𝑛 obs g are 𝑇 = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4. The full-field constrains utilise the Poisson likelihood (Eq. 11) with a prior range of 𝛽 ∈ [0.75, 0.80] (𝛽 ∈ [0.74, 0.79]) for GR (F6). Thresholded constrai… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Constraint on 𝛽 and | 𝑓𝑅0 | from 𝑛g full-field analysis for the F6 fiducial model across 100 Poisson realisations. 6.2 Different Poisson Seeds and DM Initial Conditions We next assess the robustness of our pipeline against stochastic varia￾tions in Poisson noise. For this test, we generate a total of 100 indepen￾dent noisy galaxy fields by varying the Poisson seed used to populate the 𝑛 obs g field, rerunn… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

132 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · 31 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Pylians: Python libraries for the analysis of numerical simulations

  2. [2]

    The Manticore Project II: Bayesian digital twins of cosmic structure across the SDSS and BOSS volumes

    The Manticore Project II: Bayesian digital twins of cosmic structure across the SDSS and BOSS volumes. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2606.10020 , archivePrefix =. 2606.10020 , primaryClass =

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    Physical Bayesian modelling of the non-linear matter distribution: New insights into the nearby universe. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833710 , archivePrefix =. 1806.11117 , primaryClass =

  4. [4]

    Models of f(R) Cosmic Acceleration that Evade Solar-System Tests

    Hu, Wayne and Sawicki, Ignacy. Models of f(R) Cosmic Acceleration that Evade Solar-System Tests. Phys. Rev. D. 2007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.064004. arXiv:0705.1158

  5. [6]

    Bye-bye, Local-in-matter-density Bias: The Statistics of the Halo Field Are Poorly Determined by the Local Mass Density

    Bye-bye, Local-in-matter-density Bias: The Statistics of the Halo Field Are Poorly Determined by the Local Mass Density. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad97b9 , archivePrefix =. 2405.00635 , primaryClass =

  6. [7]

    Testing Scale-Dependent Modified Gravity with DESI DR1

    Testing Scale-Dependent Modified Gravity with DESI DR1. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.26915 , archivePrefix =. 2604.26915 , primaryClass =

  7. [8]

    DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/tr6y-kpc6 , archivePrefix =. 2503.14738 , primaryClass =

  8. [9]

    , keywords =

    Validation of the Scientific Program for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad0b08 , archivePrefix =. 2306.06307 , primaryClass =

  9. [10]

    Overview of the Euclid mission

    Euclid: I. Overview of the Euclid mission. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450810 , archivePrefix =. 2405.13491 , primaryClass =

  10. [11]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    LSST Science Book, Version 2.0. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.0912.0201 , archivePrefix =. 0912.0201 , primaryClass =

  11. [12]

    , keywords =

    The 2MASS Redshift Survey Description and Data Release. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/199/2/26 , archivePrefix =. 1108.0669 , primaryClass =

  12. [13]

    Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science , keywords =

    Dark Energy Versus Modified Gravity. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102115-044553 , archivePrefix =. 1601.06133 , primaryClass =

  13. [14]

    Reports on Progress in Physics , keywords =

    Cosmological tests of modified gravity. Reports on Progress in Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/4/046902 , archivePrefix =. 1504.04623 , primaryClass =

  14. [15]

    Journal of High Energy Astrophysics , keywords =

    Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies. Journal of High Energy Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002 , archivePrefix =. 2203.06142 , primaryClass =

  15. [16]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , keywords =

    In the realm of the Hubble tension-a review of solutions. Classical and Quantum Gravity , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d , archivePrefix =. 2103.01183 , primaryClass =

  16. [17]

    , keywords =

    Large-scale galaxy bias. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 , archivePrefix =. 1611.09787 , primaryClass =

  17. [18]

    , keywords =

    Modified gravity and cosmology. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.01.001 , archivePrefix =. 1106.2476 , primaryClass =

  18. [19]

    , keywords =

    Strong Constraints on Cosmological Gravity from GW170817 and GRB 170817A. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.251301 , archivePrefix =. 1710.06394 , primaryClass =

  19. [20]

    , keywords =

    How filaments of galaxies are woven into the cosmic web. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/380603a0 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9512141 , primaryClass =

  20. [21]

    , keywords =

    Evolution of the cosmic web. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu768 , archivePrefix =. 1401.7866 , primaryClass =

  21. [22]

    , keywords =

    The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: spectra and redshifts. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04902.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0106498 , primaryClass =

  22. [23]

    , keywords =

    The Three-Dimensional Power Spectrum of Galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/382125 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0310725 , primaryClass =

  23. [24]

    , keywords =

    Bayesian physical reconstruction of initial conditions from large-scale structure surveys. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt449 , archivePrefix =. 1203.3639 , primaryClass =

  24. [25]

    ELUCID Exploring the Local Universe with the Reconstructed Initial Density Field. I. Hamiltonian Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method with Particle Mesh Dynamics. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/794/1/94 , archivePrefix =. 1407.3451 , primaryClass =

  25. [26]

    , keywords =

    Past and present cosmic structure in the SDSS DR7 main sample. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/01/036 , archivePrefix =. 1409.6308 , primaryClass =

  26. [27]

    , keywords =

    Unmasking the masked Universe: the 2M++ catalogue through Bayesian eyes. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2499 , archivePrefix =. 1509.05040 , primaryClass =

  27. [28]

    On the accuracy and precision of correlation functions and field-level inference in cosmology

    On the accuracy and precision of correlation functions and field-level inference in cosmology. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slab081 , archivePrefix =. 2103.04158 , primaryClass =

  28. [29]

    , keywords =

    Bayesian field-level inference of primordial non-Gaussianity using next-generation galaxy surveys. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad432 , archivePrefix =. 2203.08838 , primaryClass =

  29. [30]

    , keywords =

    Cosmological inference from Bayesian forward modelling of deep galaxy redshift surveys. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834117 , archivePrefix =. 1808.07496 , primaryClass =

  30. [31]

    The Shear-to-Cosmology Paradigm I. Hybrid Field-Level and Simulation-Based Framework for Weak Lensing Surveys

    The Shear-to-Cosmology Paradigm I: Hybrid Field-Level and Simulation-Based Framework for Weak Lensing Surveys. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2511.22851 , archivePrefix =. 2511.22851 , primaryClass =

  31. [32]

    Map-based cosmology inference with weak lensing -- information content and its dependence on the parameter space

    Map-based cosmology inference with weak lensing - information content and its dependence on the parameter space. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad160 , archivePrefix =. 2307.00070 , primaryClass =

  32. [33]

    , keywords =

    Cosmological reconstruction from galaxy light: neural network based light-matter connection. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/10/028 , archivePrefix =. 1805.02247 , primaryClass =

  33. [34]

    Cosmological parameters from combined second- and third-order aperture mass statistics of cosmic shear

    Cosmological parameters from combined second- and third-order aperture mass statistics of cosmic shear. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053531 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0505581 , primaryClass =

  34. [35]

    Constraining M _ with the bispectrum. Part II. The information content of the galaxy bispectrum monopole. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/04/029 , archivePrefix =. 2012.02200 , primaryClass =

  35. [36]

    Tests of Modified Gravity Theories in the Solar System

    Tests of modified gravity theories in the Solar System. Canadian Journal of Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1139/cjp-2014-0176 , archivePrefix =. 1404.0313 , primaryClass =

  36. [37]

    Living Reviews in Relativity , keywords =

    The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment. Living Reviews in Relativity , keywords =. doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 , archivePrefix =. 1403.7377 , primaryClass =

  37. [38]

    , keywords =

    Chameleon cosmology. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.044026 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0309411 , primaryClass =

  38. [39]

    , keywords =

    The cosmological simulation code GADGET-2. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0505010 , primaryClass =

  39. [40]

    , keywords =

    Solving large scale structure in ten easy steps with COLA. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/06/036 , archivePrefix =. 1301.0322 , primaryClass =

  40. [41]

    , keywords =

    COLA with scale-dependent growth: applications to screened modified gravity models. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/08/006 , archivePrefix =. 1703.00879 , primaryClass =

  41. [42]

    , keywords =

    ICE-COLA: fast simulations for weak lensing observables. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2544 , archivePrefix =. 1707.06312 , primaryClass =

  42. [43]

    , keywords =

    Matching Bayesian and frequentist coverage probabilities when using an approximate data covariance matrix. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3540 , archivePrefix =. 2108.10402 , primaryClass =

  43. [44]

    , keywords =

    Bayesian calibrated significance levels applied to the spectral tilt and hemispherical asymmetry. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12707.x , archivePrefix =. 0706.3014 , primaryClass =

  44. [45]

    , keywords =

    1.8 per cent measurement of H _ 0 from Cepheids alone. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2260 , archivePrefix =. 2509.09665 , primaryClass =

  45. [46]

    Neural network reconstruction of density and velocity fields from the 2MASS Redshift Survey

    Neural network reconstruction of density and velocity fields from the 2MASS Redshift Survey. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450219 , archivePrefix =. 2404.02278 , primaryClass =

  46. [47]

    , keywords =

    The Velocity Field Olympics: assessing velocity field reconstructions with direct distance tracers. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1960 , archivePrefix =. 2502.00121 , primaryClass =

  47. [48]

    , keywords =

    emcee: The MCMC Hammer. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/670067 , archivePrefix =. 1202.3665 , primaryClass =

  48. [49]

    , keywords =

    NEXUS: tracing the cosmic web connection. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts416 , archivePrefix =. 1209.2043 , primaryClass =

  49. [50]

    , keywords =

    Effects of baryonic feedback on the cosmic web. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.023514 , archivePrefix =. 2212.05927 , primaryClass =

  50. [51]

    The Power of the Cosmic Web

    Power of the cosmic web. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/grx3-hj7w , archivePrefix =. 2503.11778 , primaryClass =

  51. [52]

    Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321591 , archivePrefix =. 1303.5076 , primaryClass =

  52. [53]

    , keywords =

    Phase information and the evolution of cosmological density perturbations. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03086.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9905250 , primaryClass =

  53. [54]

    Characterizing the non-linear growth of large-scale structure in the Universe

    Characterizing the nonlinear growth of large-scale structure in the Universe. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/35019009 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0006017 , primaryClass =

  54. [55]

    Universal Behavior of Phase Correlations in Non-linear Gravitational Clustering

    The Universal Behavior of Phase Correlations in Nonlinear Gravitational Clustering. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/376351 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0211408 , primaryClass =

  55. [56]

    Large-Scale Structure, Theory and Statistics

    Large-scale Structure, Theory and Statistics. Phase Transitions in the Early Universe: Theory and Observations , year = 2001, editor =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0103017 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0103017 , primaryClass =

  56. [57]

    , keywords =

    The Statistics of Peaks of Gaussian Random Fields. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/164143 , adsurl =

  57. [58]

    , keywords =

    Nonlinear Gravitational Evolution of Phases and Amplitudes in One-dimensional Cosmological Density Fields. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/171726 , adsurl =

  58. [59]

    , keywords =

    Information content of the non-linear matter power spectrum. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2005.00051.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0502081 , primaryClass =

  59. [60]

    On the information content of the matter power spectrum

    On the information content of the matter power spectrum. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1595 , archivePrefix =. 1412.5511 , primaryClass =

  60. [61]

    On the inadequacy of N-point correlation functions to describe nonlinear cosmological fields: explicit examples and connection to simulations

    On the Inadequacy of N-point Correlation Functions to Describe Nonlinear Cosmological Fields: Explicit Examples and Connection to Simulations. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/750/1/28 , archivePrefix =. 1201.1444 , primaryClass =

  61. [62]

    , keywords =

    Towards optimal extraction of cosmological information from nonlinear data. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/12/009 , archivePrefix =. 1706.06645 , primaryClass =

  62. [63]

    Euclid preparation. VII. Forecast validation for Euclid cosmological probes. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038071 , archivePrefix =. 1910.09273 , primaryClass =

  63. [64]

    , keywords =

    Joint analysis of anisotropic power spectrum, bispectrum and trispectrum: application to N-body simulations. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/07/008 , archivePrefix =. 2104.03976 , primaryClass =

  64. [65]

    Minkowski Functionals in Cosmology

    Minkowski Functionals in Cosmology. Dark Matter in the Universe , year = 1996, editor =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9508154 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9508154 , primaryClass =

  65. [66]

    , keywords =

    New Probe of Departures from General Relativity Using Minkowski Functionals. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.181301 , archivePrefix =. 1704.02325 , primaryClass =

  66. [67]

    , keywords =

    Cosmic voids: a novel probe to shed light on our Universe. , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1903.05161 , archivePrefix =. 1903.05161 , primaryClass =

  67. [68]

    , keywords =

    Large-scale structure of the Universe and cosmological perturbation theory. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00135-7 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0112551 , primaryClass =

  68. [69]

    Bayesian Large Scale Structure inference and cosmic web analysis

  69. [70]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 , archivePrefix =. 1807.06209 , primaryClass =

  70. [71]

    , keywords =

    Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/300499 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9805201 , primaryClass =

  71. [72]

    , keywords =

    Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.083533 , archivePrefix =. 2007.08991 , primaryClass =

  72. [73]

    IAU Symposium , year = 2024, editor =

    The Local Value of H _ 0. IAU Symposium , year = 2024, editor =. doi:10.1017/S1743921323003034 , archivePrefix =. 2308.10954 , primaryClass =

  73. [74]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    Tensions between the early and late Universe. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0902-0 , archivePrefix =. 1907.10625 , primaryClass =

  74. [75]

    , keywords =

    Voids in modified gravity: excursion set predictions. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt219 , archivePrefix =. 1212.2216 , primaryClass =

  75. [76]

    , keywords =

    Testing gravity using cosmic voids. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv777 , archivePrefix =. 1410.1510 , primaryClass =

  76. [77]

    Distinguishing f(R) gravity with cosmic voids

    Distinguishing f(R) gravity with cosmic voids. The Zeldovich Universe: Genesis and Growth of the Cosmic Web , year = 2016, editor =. doi:10.1017/S1743921316010632 , archivePrefix =. 1410.0133 , primaryClass =

  77. [78]

    , keywords =

    Clustering of dark matter tracers: generalizing bias for the coming era of precision LSS. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2009/08/020 , archivePrefix =. 0902.0991 , primaryClass =

  78. [79]

    , keywords =

    Marked clustering statistics in f(R) gravity cosmologies. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1822 , archivePrefix =. 1801.08880 , primaryClass =

  79. [80]

    The Fifth Force in the Local Cosmic Web

    The fifth force in the local cosmic web. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sly221 , archivePrefix =. 1802.07206 , primaryClass =

  80. [81]

    , keywords =

    On the road to percent accuracy: non-linear reaction of the matter power spectrum to dark energy and modified gravity. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1836 , archivePrefix =. 1812.05594 , primaryClass =

Showing first 80 references.