Recognition: 2 theorem links
· Lean TheoremCosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies
Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 19:36 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Persistent cosmological tensions, including a 5-sigma H0 discrepancy between Planck and SH0ES, indicate cracks in the standard model and the need for new physics.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The persistence of tensions such as the 5.0 sigma H0 disagreement between Planck CMB estimates and SH0ES local measurements, along with mismatches in Omega_m and the growth rate sigma8 or f sigma8, after multiple years of scrutiny strongly suggests that the standard cosmological scenario contains cracks and requires new physics or generalisations beyond the standard model.
What carries the argument
The H0 tension between Planck CMB data and SH0ES local measurements, together with the sigma8-S8 tension, treated as indicators that motivate lists of new-physics models capable of fitting multiple datasets at once.
If this is right
- Next-decade experiments will be decisive in testing which models can simultaneously relieve the H0 and sigma8 tensions.
- Any viable model must reproduce a full suite of observations rather than adjusting isolated parameters.
- Lower-significance anomalies may join the main tensions as collective hints toward the same underlying extension.
- Generic theoretical approaches that address multiple signals together become priority targets for model building.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- If the tensions prove real, the situation parallels earlier crises that forced revisions in particle physics, requiring coordinated changes to expansion history and structure growth.
- Links to particle-physics ingredients such as dark-energy dynamics or neutrino properties would become central to resolving the data.
- Multi-probe cross-checks could either confirm new physics or expose previously hidden systematics in one dataset.
Load-bearing premise
The reported discordances are not primarily the result of systematic errors in the measurements from Planck, SH0ES, weak lensing, or redshift surveys.
What would settle it
A future joint analysis in which refined control of systematics in Planck, SH0ES, or lensing data brings the inferred H0 and sigma8 values into statistical agreement without new physics.
read the original abstract
In this paper we will list a few important goals that need to be addressed in the next decade, also taking into account the current discordances between the different cosmological probes, such as the disagreement in the value of the Hubble constant $H_0$, the $\sigma_8$--$S_8$ tension, and other less statistically significant anomalies. While these discordances can still be in part the result of systematic errors, their persistence after several years of accurate analysis strongly hints at cracks in the standard cosmological scenario and the necessity for new physics or generalisations beyond the standard model. In this paper, we focus on the $5.0\,\sigma$ tension between the {\it Planck} CMB estimate of the Hubble constant $H_0$ and the SH0ES collaboration measurements. After showing the $H_0$ evaluations made from different teams using different methods and geometric calibrations, we list a few interesting new physics models that could alleviate this tension and discuss how the next decade's experiments will be crucial. Moreover, we focus on the tension of the {\it Planck} CMB data with weak lensing measurements and redshift surveys, about the value of the matter energy density $\Omega_m$, and the amplitude or rate of the growth of structure ($\sigma_8,f\sigma_8$). We list a few interesting models proposed for alleviating this tension, and we discuss the importance of trying to fit a full array of data with a single model and not just one parameter at a time. Additionally, we present a wide range of other less discussed anomalies at a statistical significance level lower than the $H_0$--$S_8$ tensions which may also constitute hints towards new physics, and we discuss possible generic theoretical approaches that can collectively explain the non-standard nature of these signals.[Abridged]
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. This review paper summarizes key cosmological tensions and anomalies, with primary focus on the 5σ H0 discrepancy between Planck CMB measurements and SH0ES local determinations, the S8/σ8 tension with weak-lensing and redshift-survey data, and a set of lower-significance anomalies. It lists proposed new-physics models that could alleviate these discrepancies, stresses the need to fit multiple datasets simultaneously rather than parameter-by-parameter, and outlines goals for the next decade of observations while repeatedly noting that systematics remain a possible explanation.
Significance. If the reported tensions survive improved systematics control, the review usefully compiles the observational status and the range of theoretical extensions under discussion, serving as a reference that connects particle-physics, astrophysics, and cosmology communities. Its value lies in the breadth of cited measurements and models rather than in any new derivation.
minor comments (2)
- [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that persistence 'strongly hints at cracks in the standard cosmological scenario' is appropriately hedged elsewhere, but a cross-reference to the specific paragraphs that quantify the current statistical significance of each tension would improve clarity for readers who consult only the abstract.
- The manuscript would benefit from an explicit table (perhaps in §2 or §3) that tabulates the principal tension values, their reported significances, the datasets involved, and the key references, allowing quick comparison across the H0, S8, and lower-significance anomalies discussed.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for recommending acceptance. The referee's summary correctly captures the scope of our review, which compiles the status of the main cosmological tensions (primarily the 5σ H0 discrepancy and the S8/σ8 tension) along with lower-significance anomalies, proposed new-physics explanations, and the importance of joint fits to multiple datasets.
Circularity Check
Review paper with no internal derivations exhibits no circularity
full rationale
This manuscript is a comprehensive review summarizing existing cosmological tensions such as the H0 discrepancy and S8 tension from cited literature. It does not perform any new parameter fits, derivations, or model comparisons that rely on self-referential logic. All claims are grounded in external references, making the argument self-contained without circular reductions.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
Foundation.DimensionForcingdimension_forced unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
their persistence after several years of accurate analysis strongly hints at cracks in the standard cosmological scenario and the necessity for new physics or generalisations beyond the standard model
-
Foundation.PhiForcingphi_equation unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
we focus on the 5.0σ tension between the Planck CMB estimate of the Hubble constant H0 and the SH0ES collaboration measurements
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Forward citations
Cited by 22 Pith papers
-
Geometric Constraints on the Pre-Recombination Expansion History from the Hubble Tension
Model-independent reconstruction shows that early-universe modifications resolving the Hubble tension exist at the background level, requiring a smooth ~15% pre-recombination expansion rate enhancement.
-
MG-NECOLA: A Field-Level Emulator for $f(R)$ Gravity and Massive Neutrino Cosmologies
A field-level CNN emulator converts MG-PICOLA runs into near N-body accuracy for f(R) gravity and neutrino cosmologies, achieving sub-percent errors on power spectra and bispectra while generalizing beyond its training set.
-
Double the axions, half the tension: multi-field early dark energy eases the Hubble tension
Two-field axion-like early dark energy reduces Hubble tension to 1.5 sigma residual and improves high-ell CMB fits over single-field models.
-
Observational Tests for Distinguishing Classes of Cosmological Models
A new null test is proposed to isolate cosmologies with non-FLRW observational relations by characterizing how they violate curvature-consistency tests of the standard FLRW framework.
-
Cosmological Dynamics of a Non-Canonical Generalised Brans-Dicke Theory
A non-canonical generalized Brans-Dicke theory admits background cosmological solutions matching Lambda CDM characteristics for constant, power-law, and exponential potentials, with dynamics distinct from other scalar...
-
From Scalar $H_0$ to $E(z)$: A Reformulation of the Hubble Tension
Re-expressing the Hubble tension via posterior-implied E(z) histories yields moderate mismatches (S_hist of 1.65 and 2.55) that correspond to only 1.1-2.1 sigma equivalents, below the usual 4.9 sigma scalar-H0 discrepancy.
-
Cosmological intercept tension
Tensions in the supernova intercept a_B at z~0.01 in PantheonPlus and z~0.1 in DES-Y5 point to data systematics or inter-survey inconsistencies rather than new physics, aligning H0 measurements and reducing support fo...
-
A barotropic alternative to Early Dark Energy for alleviating the $H_0$ tension
A barotropic fluid with ω_s ≈ 0.29 and Ω_s ≈ 1.5×10^{-5} raises the inferred H0 to match SH0ES while remaining consistent with Planck CMB, DESI BAO, and Pantheon data.
-
Do equation of state parametrizations of dark energy faithfully capture the dynamics of the late universe?
Node-based reconstruction of cosmic expansion prefers stronger deceleration at z≈1.7 than smooth DE EoS parametrizations, isolating z~1.5-2 as a window where the latter may compress localized kinematic features permit...
-
Measuring neutrino mass in light of ACT DR6 and DESI DR2
New ACT and DESI data yield model-dependent upper limits on sum of neutrino masses, with holographic dark energy giving the tightest bounds and a consistent preference for degenerate hierarchy.
-
A statistical look on kinematic planes of satellite galaxies II: The physics behind their early formation in TNG50 MW/M31-like galaxies
Early kinematically persistent planes of satellite galaxies are fossil remnants of high-redshift anisotropic mass collapse along the principal directions of the local cosmic web during the fast assembly phase of host halos.
-
HOLISMOKES XXI: Detecting strongly lensed type Ia supernovae from time series of multi-band LSST-like imaging data -- Part II
A convLSTM classifier identifies lensed SNe Ia in simulated LSST-like time series, reaching ~60% true-positive rate at O(10^{-4}) false-positive rate by the seventh epoch even after adding realistic PSF variations and...
-
Reevaluation of Inflationary Dynamics in Extended General Relativity with Perturbatively and Tensorially Structured Conformal Metric
A perturbatively and tensorially structured quantum-deformed conformal metric yields analytical expressions for inflationary observables including quantum corrections to power spectra, spectral indices, and tensor-to-...
-
Precision Analysis for $\boldsymbol{H_0}$ Using Upcoming Multi-band Gravitational Wave Observations
Multi-band GW observations of PBHs can reduce H0 uncertainty to ≲2 km/s/Mpc (conservative) or O(0.1) km/s/Mpc (optimistic) via Fisher forecasts on M_PBH and f_PBH.
-
Spatially Resolved Kinematics of SLACS Lens Galaxies. II: Breaking Degeneracies with Lensing and Dynamical Models
Spatially resolved kinematics show SLACS lens galaxies have nearly isothermal total mass profiles (mean γ=2.04) with average mass-sheet parameter λ_int=1.01, consistent with no measurable bias from power-law assumptio...
-
Coupled Dark Energy and Dark Matter for DESI: An Effective Guide to the Phantom Divide
Coupled quintessence-dark matter models can produce an apparent phantom-crossing effective equation of state matching DESI preferences if the scalar field begins frozen in the radiation era.
-
Probing the Evolution of Dark Energy: A Joint Analysis of DESI DR2, Pantheon+, and Cosmic Chronometers
Joint analysis of DESI DR2, Pantheon+, and cosmic chronometers yields a mild statistical preference for time-varying dark energy over LambdaCDM, though constraints on the evolution remain moderate.
-
Gamma-Ray Bursts as an Independent High-Redshift Probe of Dark Energy
Forecasts show that ~66 optical GRBs can achieve σ_w ≈ 0.47 in wCDM using Dainotti relations, matching Planck precision and enabling independent high-redshift tests of dark energy.
-
Constraints on Phenomenological Amplitudes of CMB Anisotropy with Multi-Datasets
Lensing amplitude A_L deviates from 1 at up to 3.06 sigma in combined datasets while other phenomenological amplitudes remain consistent with Lambda CDM or are poorly constrained.
-
Machine-learning applications for weak-lensing cosmology
Machine learning techniques can mitigate limitations in traditional weak-lensing analyses and enhance extraction of cosmological information from galaxy imaging surveys.
-
Breaking Free from the Swampland of Impossible Universes through the DESI Portal
DESI data indicating evolving dark energy may allow string theory to describe observed universes without violating swampland constraints on constant dark energy.
-
Observational tests of \texorpdfstring{$\Lambda(t)$}{Lambda(t)} cosmology in light of DESI DR2
MCMC constraints on two Lambda(t) models with DESI DR2, CC, and Pantheon+ data yield H0 ~72.5-73 km/s/Mpc, Omega_m0 near standard values in joint fits, and n~0.3 indicating mild deviation from LambdaCDM.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
M. Zajaˇ ceket al., “Time Delay of Mg II Emission Response for the Luminous Quasar HE 0435-4312: toward Application of the High-accretor Radius-Luminosity Relation in Cosmology,” Astrophys. J. 912 no. 1, (May, 2021) 10, arXiv:2012.12409 [astro-ph.GA]
-
[2]
N. Khadka, Z. Yu, M. Zajaˇ cek, M. L. Martinez-Aldama, B. Czerny, and B. Ratra, “Standardizing reverberation-measured Mg II time-lag quasars, by using the radius-luminosity relation, and constraining cosmological model parameters,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 508 no. 4, (2021) 4722–4737, arXiv:2106.11136 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[3]
Gravitationally lensed quasars and supernovae in future wide-field optical imaging surveys
M. Oguri and P. J. Marshall, “Gravitationally lensed quasars and supernovae in future wide-field optical imaging surveys,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 405 (2010) 2579–2593, arXiv:1001.2037 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
-
[4]
S. Refsdal, “On the possibility of determining Hubble’s parameter and the masses of galaxies from the gravitational lens effect,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 128 (Jan., 1964) 307
work page 1964
-
[5]
Detection of the Gravitational Lens Magnifying a Type Ia Supernova
R. M. Quimby, M. Oguri, A. More, S. More, T. J. Moriya, M. C. Werner, M. Tanaka, G. Folatelli, M. C. Bersten, and K. Nomoto, “Detection of the Gravitational Lens Magnifying a Type Ia Supernova,” Science 344 no. 6, (2014) 396–399, arXiv:1404.6014 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
-
[6]
Multiple Images of a Highly Magnified Supernova Formed by an Early-Type Cluster Galaxy Lens
P. L. Kelly et al., “Multiple Images of a Highly Magnified Supernova Formed by an Early-Type Cluster Galaxy Lens,” Science 347 (2015) 1123, arXiv:1411.6009 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
-
[7]
Deja Vu All Over Again: The Reappearance of Supernova Refsdal
P. L. Kelly et al., “Deja Vu All Over Again: The Reappearance of Supernova Refsdal,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 819 no. 1, (2016) L8, arXiv:1512.04654 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
-
[8]
Measuring the value of the Hubble constant "\`a la Refsdal"
C. Grillo et al., “Measuring the Value of the Hubble Constant ”` a la Refsdal”,”Astrophys. J. 860 no. 2, (2018) 94, arXiv:1802.01584 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[9]
iPTF16geu: A multiply imaged, gravitationally lensed type Ia supernova
A. Goobar et al., “iPTF16geu: A multiply imaged, gravitationally lensed type Ia supernova,” Science 356 (2017) 291–295, arXiv:1611.00014 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[10]
A spectroscopic look at the gravitationally lensed type Ia SN 2016geu at z=0.409
Z. Cano, J. Selsing, J. Hjorth, A. de Ugarte Postigo, L. Christensen, C. Gall, and D. A. Kann, “A spectroscopic look at the gravitationally lensed Type Ia supernova 2016geu at z = 0.409,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 473 no. 3, (2018) 4257–4267, arXiv:1708.05534 [astro-ph.HE]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[11]
A gravitationally lensed supernova with an observable two-decade time delay,
S. A. Rodney, G. B. Brammer, J. D. R. Pierel, J. Richard, S. Toft, K. F. O’Connor, M. Akhshik, and K. E. Whitaker, “A gravitationally lensed supernova with an observable two-decade time delay,” Nature Astron. 5 no. 11, (2021) 1118–1125, arXiv:2106.08935 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[12]
How to Find Gravitationally Lensed Type Ia Supernovae
D. A. Goldstein and P. E. Nugent, “How to Find Gravitationally Lensed Type Ia Supernovae,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 834 no. 1, (2017) L5, arXiv:1611.09459 [astro-ph.IM]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[13]
D. A. Goldstein, P. E. Nugent, and A. Goobar, “Rates and Properties of Supernovae Strongly Gravitationally Lensed by Elliptical Galaxies in Time-domain Imaging Surveys,” Astrophys. J. Suppl. 243 no. 1, (2019) 6, arXiv:1809.10147 [astro-ph.GA]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
-
[14]
R. Wojtak, J. Hjorth, and C. Gall, “Magnified or multiply imaged? – Search strategies for gravitationally lensed supernovae in wide-field surveys,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 487 no. 3, (2019) 3342–3355, arXiv:1903.07687 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[15]
Wide-Field InfraRed Survey Telescope (WFIRST) Final Report
J. Green et al., “Wide-Field InfraRed Survey Telescope (WFIRST) Final Report,” arXiv:1208.4012 [astro-ph.IM]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[16]
Projected Cosmological Constraints from Strongly Lensed Supernovae with the Roman Space Telescope,
J. D. R. Pierel, S. Rodney, G. Vernardos, M. Oguri, R. Kessler, and T. Anguita, “Projected Cosmological Constraints from Strongly Lensed Supernovae with the Roman Space Telescope,” Astrophys. J. 908 no. 2, (2021) 190, arXiv:2010.12399 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[17]
AI-driven spatio-temporal engine for finding gravitationally lensed supernovae,
D. K. Ramanah, N. Arendse, and R. Wojtak, “AI-driven spatio-temporal engine for finding gravitationally lensed supernovae,” arXiv:2107.12399 [astro-ph.IM]
-
[18]
DeepZipper: A Novel Deep Learning Architecture for Lensed Supernovae Identification,
R. Morgan et al., “DeepZipper: A Novel Deep Learning Architecture for Lensed Supernovae Identification,” arXiv:2112.01541 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[19]
P. Craig, K. O’Connor, S. Chakrabarti, S. A. Rodney, J. R. Pierel, C. McCully, and I. Perez-Fournon, “A targeted search for strongly lensed supernovae and expectations for targeted searches in the Rubin era,” arXiv:2111.01680 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[20]
Improved time-delay lens modelling and H0 inference with transient sources,
X. Ding, K. Liao, S. Birrer, A. J. Shajib, T. Treu, and L. Yang, “Improved time-delay lens modelling and H0 inference with transient sources,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 504 (2021) 5621, arXiv:2103.08609 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[21]
On model-dependent bounds on H(0) from gravitational images : application to Q 0957+561 A, B.,
E. E. Falco, M. V. Gorenstein, and I. I. Shapiro, “On model-dependent bounds on H(0) from gravitational images : application to Q 0957+561 A, B.,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 289 (Feb., 1985) L1–L4
work page 1985
-
[22]
Degeneracies in Parameter Estimates for Models of Gravitational Lens Systems,
M. V. Gorenstein, E. E. Falco, and I. I. Shapiro, “Degeneracies in Parameter Estimates for Models of Gravitational Lens Systems,” Astrophys. J. 327 (Apr., 1988) 693
work page 1988
-
[23]
Lensing Degeneracies Revisited
P. Saha, C. Lobo, A. Iovino, D. Lazzati, and G. Chincarini, “Lensing degeneracies revisited,” Astron. J. 120 (2000) 1654, arXiv:astro-ph/0006432
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
-
[24]
The Impact of Microlensing on the Standardisation of Strongly Lensed Type Ia Supernovae
M. Foxley-Marrable, T. E. Collett, G. Vernardos, D. A. Goldstein, and D. Bacon, “The impact of microlensing on the standardization of strongly lensed Type Ia supernovae,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 478 no. 4, (2018) 5081–5090, arXiv:1802.07738 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[25]
The Hubble Constant from Strongly Lensed Supernovae with Standardizable Magnifications,
S. Birrer, S. Dhawan, and A. J. Shajib, “The Hubble Constant from Strongly Lensed Supernovae with Standardizable Magnifications,” Astrophys. J. 924 no. 1, (2022) 2, arXiv:2107.12385 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[26]
A Quadruply Lensed SN Ia: Gaining a Time-Delay...Losing a Standard Candle
D. A. Yahalomi, P. L. Schechter, and J. Wambsganss, “A Quadruply Lensed SN Ia: Gaining a Time-Delay...Losing a Standard Candle,” arXiv:1711.07919 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[27]
D. A. Goldstein, P. E. Nugent, D. N. Kasen, and T. E. Collett, “Precise Time Delays from Strongly Gravitationally 212 Lensed Type Ia Supernovae with Chromatically Microlensed Images,” Astrophys. J. 855 no. 1, (2018) 22, arXiv:1708.00003 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[28]
On the Effects of Line-of-Sight Structures on Lensing Flux-ratio Anomalies in a LCDM Universe
D. D. Xu, S. Mao, A. Cooper, L. Gao, C. Frenk, R. Angulo, and J. Helly, “On the Effects of Line-of-Sight Structures on Lensing Flux-ratio Anomalies in a LCDM Universe,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 421 (2012) 2553, arXiv:1110.1185 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
-
[29]
Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger
LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 no. 6, (2016) 061102, arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
-
[30]
LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA Collaboration, R. Abbott et al., “GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run,” arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[31]
Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO
D. Reitze et al., “Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO,” Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51 (7, 2019) 035, arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
-
[32]
A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community
M. Evans et al., “A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community,” arXiv:2109.09882 [astro-ph.IM]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[33]
M. Maggiore et al., “Science Case for the Einstein Telescope,” JCAP 03 (2020) 050, arXiv:1912.02622 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[34]
Laser Interferometer Space Antenna
LISA Collaboration, P. Amaro-Seoane et al., “Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,” arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[35]
TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector
TianQin Collaboration, J. Luo et al., “TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector,” Class. Quant. Grav. 33 no. 3, (2016) 035010, arXiv:1512.02076 [astro-ph.IM]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
-
[36]
The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity,
W.-R. Hu and Y.-L. Wu, “The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity,” Natl. Sci. Rev. 4 no. 5, (2017) 685–686
work page 2017
-
[37]
Kawamura et al., PTEP2021, 05A105 (2021), arXiv:2006.13545 [gr-qc]
S. Kawamura et al., “Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO,” PTEP 2021 no. 5, (2021) 05A105, arXiv:2006.13545 [gr-qc]
-
[38]
Using gravitational-wave standard sirens
D. E. Holz and S. A. Hughes, “Using gravitational-wave standard sirens,” Astrophys. J. 629 (2005) 15–22, arXiv:astro-ph/0504616
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
-
[39]
Short GRB and binary black hole standard sirens as a probe of dark energy
N. Dalal, D. E. Holz, S. A. Hughes, and B. Jain, “Short grb and binary black hole standard sirens as a probe of dark energy,” Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 063006, arXiv:astro-ph/0601275
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
-
[40]
The cosmological impact of future constraints on $H_0$ from gravitational-wave standard sirens
E. Di Valentino, D. E. Holz, A. Melchiorri, and F. Renzi, “The cosmological impact of future constraints on H0 from gravitational-wave standard sirens,” Phys. Rev. D98 no. 8, (2018) 083523, arXiv:1806.07463 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[41]
Measuring the Hubble constant with neutron star black hole mergers
S. Vitale and H.-Y. Chen, “Measuring the Hubble constant with neutron star black hole mergers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 no. 2, (2018) 021303, arXiv:1804.07337 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[42]
Determining the Hubble constant from gravitational wave observations of merging compact binaries
S. Nissanke, D. E. Holz, N. Dalal, S. A. Hughes, J. L. Sievers, and C. M. Hirata, “Determining the Hubble constant from gravitational wave observations of merging compact binaries,” arXiv:1307.2638 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[43]
Unbiased Hubble constant estimation from binary neutron star mergers,
D. J. Mortlock, S. M. Feeney, H. V. Peiris, A. R. Williamson, and S. M. Nissanke, “Unbiased Hubble constant estimation from binary neutron star mergers,” Phys. Rev. D 100 no. 10, (2019) 103523, arXiv:1811.11723 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[44]
E. Di Valentino and A. Melchiorri, “First cosmological constraints combining Planck with the recent gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant,” Phys. Rev. D97 no. 4, (2018) 041301, arXiv:1710.06370 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[45]
Next-generation Spectroscopic Surveys with DESI,
K. Dawson et al., “Next-generation Spectroscopic Surveys with DESI,”. https://www.snowmass21.org/docs/files/summaries/CF/SNOWMASS21-CF6_CF4_Dawson-041.pdf
-
[46]
LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, M. Fishbach et al., “A Standard Siren Measurement of the Hubble Constant from GW170817 without the Electromagnetic Counterpart,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 871 no. 1, (2019) L13, arXiv:1807.05667 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
-
[47]
DES Collaboration, A. Palmese et al., “A statistical standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant from the LIGO/Virgo gravitational wave compact object merger GW190814 and Dark Energy Survey galaxies,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 900 no. 2, (2020) L33, arXiv:2006.14961 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[48]
Dark Sirens to Resolve the Hubble–Lemaˆ ıtre Tension,
S. Borhanian, A. Dhani, A. Gupta, K. G. Arun, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Dark Sirens to Resolve the Hubble–Lemaˆ ıtre Tension,”Astrophys. J. Lett. 905 no. 2, (2020) L28, arXiv:2007.02883 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[49]
Challenges for the statistical gravitational-wave method to measure the Hubble constant,
E. Trott and D. Huterer, “Challenges for the statistical gravitational-wave method to measure the Hubble constant,” arXiv:2112.00241 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[50]
S. Mukherjee and B. D. Wandelt, “Beyond the classical distance-redshift test: cross-correlating redshift-free standard candles and sirens with redshift surveys,” arXiv:1808.06615 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[51]
GW \times$LSS: chasing the progenitors of merging binary black holes,
G. Scelfo, N. Bellomo, A. Raccanelli, S. Matarrese, and L. Verde, “GW \times$LSS: chasing the progenitors of merging binary black holes,” JCAP 09 (2018) 039, arXiv:1809.03528 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[52]
Probing the theory of gravity with gravitational lensing of gravitational waves and galaxy surveys,
S. Mukherjee, B. D. Wandelt, and J. Silk, “Probing the theory of gravity with gravitational lensing of gravitational waves and galaxy surveys,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 494 no. 2, (2020) 1956–1970, arXiv:1908.08951 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[53]
Exploring galaxies-gravitational waves cross-correlations as an astrophysical probe,
G. Scelfo, L. Boco, A. Lapi, and M. Viel, “Exploring galaxies-gravitational waves cross-correlations as an astrophysical probe,” JCAP 10 (2020) 045, arXiv:2007.08534 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[54]
Gravitational Radiation, Inspiraling Binaries, and Cosmology
D. F. Chernoff and L. S. Finn, “Gravitational radiation, inspiraling binaries, and cosmology,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 411 (1993) L5–L8, arXiv:gr-qc/9304020
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993
-
[55]
Jumping the Gap: Searching for LIGO’s Biggest Black Holes,
J. M. Ezquiaga and D. E. Holz, “Jumping the Gap: Searching for LIGO’s Biggest Black Holes,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 909 no. 2, (2021) L23, arXiv:2006.02211 [astro-ph.HE] . 213
-
[56]
C. Messenger and J. Read, “Measuring a cosmological distance-redshift relationship using only gravitational wave observations of binary neutron star coalescences,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 091101, arXiv:1107.5725 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
-
[57]
Cosmology with Love: Measuring the Hubble constant using neutron star universal relations,
D. Chatterjee, A. H. K. R., G. Holder, D. E. Holz, S. Perkins, K. Yagi, and N. Yunes, “Cosmology with Love: Measuring the Hubble constant using neutron star universal relations,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 8, (2021) 083528, arXiv:2106.06589 [gr-qc]
-
[58]
N. Tamanini, C. Caprini, E. Barausse, A. Sesana, A. Klein, and A. Petiteau, “Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. III: Probing the expansion of the Universe using gravitational wave standard sirens,” JCAP 04 (2016) 002, arXiv:1601.07112 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
-
[59]
Accelerating Universes with Scaling Dark Matter
M. Chevallier and D. Polarski, “Accelerating universes with scaling dark matter,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D10 (2001) 213–224, arXiv:gr-qc/0009008 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
-
[60]
Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe
E. V. Linder, “Exploring the expansion history of the universe,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 091301, arXiv:astro-ph/0208512 [astro-ph]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
-
[61]
Will cosmic gravitational wave sirens determine the Hubble constant?,
A. Shafieloo, R. E. Keeley, and E. V. Linder, “Will cosmic gravitational wave sirens determine the Hubble constant?,” JCAP 03 (2020) 019, arXiv:1812.07775 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[62]
Debiasing Cosmic Gravitational Wave Sirens,
R. E. Keeley, A. Shafieloo, B. L’Huillier, and E. V. Linder, “Debiasing Cosmic Gravitational Wave Sirens,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 491 no. 3, (2020) 3983–3989, arXiv:1905.10216 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[63]
Gravitational Lensing of Gravitational Waves from Merging Neutron Star Binaries
Y. Wang, A. Stebbins, and E. L. Turner, “Gravitational lensing of gravitational waves from merging neutron star binaries,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 2875–2878, arXiv:astro-ph/9605140
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
-
[64]
M. Oguri, “Effect of gravitational lensing on the distribution of gravitational waves from distant binary black hole mergers,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 480 no. 3, (2018) 3842–3855, arXiv:1807.02584 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[65]
Gravitational lensing of gravitational waves: A statistical perspective
S.-S. Li, S. Mao, Y. Zhao, and Y. Lu, “Gravitational lensing of gravitational waves: A statistical perspective,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 476 no. 2, (2018) 2220–2229, arXiv:1802.05089 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[66]
F. Xu, J. M. a. Ezquiaga, and D. E. Holz, “Please repeat: Strong lensing of gravitational waves as a probe of compact binary and galaxy populations,” arXiv:2105.14390 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[67]
R.-G. Cai and T. Yang, “Estimating cosmological parameters by the simulated data of gravitational waves from the Einstein Telescope,” Phys. Rev. D 95 no. 4, (2017) 044024, arXiv:1608.08008 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[68]
Limits on the number of spacetime dimensions from GW170817
K. Pardo, M. Fishbach, D. E. Holz, and D. N. Spergel, “Limits on the number of spacetime dimensions from GW170817,” JCAP 07 (2018) 048, arXiv:1801.08160 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[69]
Future constraints on dynamical dark-energy using gravitational-wave standard sirens,
M. Du, W. Yang, L. Xu, S. Pan, and D. F. Mota, “Future constraints on dynamical dark-energy using gravitational-wave standard sirens,” Phys. Rev. D 100 no. 4, (2019) 043535, arXiv:1812.01440 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[70]
Forecasting interacting vacuum-energy models using gravitational waves,
W. Yang, S. Pan, E. Di Valentino, B. Wang, and A. Wang, “Forecasting interacting vacuum-energy models using gravitational waves,” JCAP 05 (2020) 050, arXiv:1904.11980 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[71]
J.-J. Wei, “Model-independent Curvature Determination from Gravitational-Wave Standard Sirens and Cosmic Chronometers,” Astrophys. J. 868 no. 1, (2018) 29, arXiv:1806.09781 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[72]
X.-N. Zhang, L.-F. Wang, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, “Improving cosmological parameter estimation with the future gravitational-wave standard siren observation from the Einstein Telescope,” Phys. Rev. D 99 no. 6, (2019) 063510, arXiv:1804.08379 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
-
[73]
L.-F. Wang, X.-N. Zhang, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, “Impacts of gravitational-wave standard siren observation of the Einstein Telescope on weighing neutrinos in cosmology,” Phys. Lett. B 782 (2018) 87–93, arXiv:1802.04720 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[74]
J.-F. Zhang, H.-Y. Dong, J.-Z. Qi, and X. Zhang, “Prospect for constraining holographic dark energy with gravitational wave standard sirens from the Einstein Telescope,” Eur. Phys. J. C 80 no. 3, (2020) 217, arXiv:1906.07504 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[75]
J.-Z. Qi, S. Cao, C. Zheng, Y. Pan, Z. Li, J. Li, and T. Liu, “Testing the Etherington distance duality relation at higher redshifts: Combined radio quasar and gravitational wave data,” Phys. Rev. D 99 no. 6, (2019) 063507, arXiv:1902.01988 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
-
[76]
Listening to the sound of dark sector interactions with gravitational wave standard sirens,
W. Yang, S. Vagnozzi, E. Di Valentino, R. C. Nunes, S. Pan, and D. F. Mota, “Listening to the sound of dark sector interactions with gravitational wave standard sirens,” JCAP 07 (2019) 037, arXiv:1905.08286 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[77]
Testing Cosmic Distance-Duality Relation from Future Gravitational Wave Standard Sirens
X. Fu, L. Zhou, and J. Chen, “Testing the cosmic distance-duality relation from future gravitational wave standard sirens,” Phys. Rev. D 99 no. 8, (2019) 083523, arXiv:1903.09913 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
-
[78]
Forecast constraints on Anisotropic Stress in Dark Energy using gravitational-waves,
W. Yang, S. Pan, D. F. Mota, and M. Du, “Forecast constraints on Anisotropic Stress in Dark Energy using gravitational-waves,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 497 no. 1, (2020) 879–893, arXiv:2001.02180 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[79]
Forecasts on the speed of gravitational waves at high z,
A. Bonilla, R. D’Agostino, R. C. Nunes, and J. C. N. de Araujo, “Forecasts on the speed of gravitational waves at high z,” JCAP 03 (2020) 015, arXiv:1910.05631 [gr-qc]
-
[80]
H.-Y. Chen, P. S. Cowperthwaite, B. D. Metzger, and E. Berger, “A Program for Multimessenger Standard Siren Cosmology in the Era of LIGO A+, Rubin Observatory, and Beyond,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 908 no. 1, (2021) L4, arXiv:2011.01211 [astro-ph.CO]
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.