pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.12155 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.CO

Recognition: unknown

Spatially Resolved Kinematics of SLACS Lens Galaxies. II: Breaking Degeneracies with Lensing and Dynamical Models

Shawn Knabel , Tommaso Treu , Michele Cappellari , Simon Birrer , Xiang-Yu Huang , Anowar J. Shajib , William Sheu
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO
keywords strong gravitational lensinggalaxy kinematicsmass density profilestime-delay cosmographySLACS sampleJeans anisotropic modelingpower-law profiles
0
0 comments X

The pith

Combined lensing and dynamical models show SLACS lens galaxies have nearly isothermal power-law mass profiles with mean slope 2.04 and no measurable bias in time-delay cosmography.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper models the mass density profiles of 14 strong lens galaxies using spatially resolved kinematics from integral-field spectroscopy combined with gravitational lensing constraints from HST imaging. It finds that the total mass density follows a power-law form with slope close to 2, indicating nearly isothermal profiles, and constrains deviations from this form through the mass-sheet parameter to an average near 1. This result matters because it shows that simple power-law models can be used for these galaxies in cosmological applications without introducing bias, while indicating that more flexible models would better match the high-resolution kinematic data.

Core claim

We find nearly isothermal power-law total mass density slopes (ρ_tot ∝ r^{-γ}) for the sample with a mean of γ = 2.04±0.02 with intrinsic scatter of 0.08^{+0.03}_{-0.02}. The mean value of λ_int for the sample is 1.01±0.03, with intrinsic scatter of 0.11±0.03. On average power-law mass profiles are a good first-order description of the SLACS sample and do not introduce measurable bias in time-delay cosmography, although more flexible mass models should be able to reproduce the highly detailed kinematic datasets more accurately.

What carries the argument

Jeans Anisotropic Modeling (JAM) applied to 2D kinematic maps jointly with lens models, using priors on anisotropy and shape to break the mass-anisotropy degeneracy and explicitly fitting the mass-sheet parameter λ_int sensitive to the mass-sheet degeneracy.

Load-bearing premise

Informative priors on velocity anisotropy and intrinsic galaxy shape from local galaxy samples are required to break the residual mass-anisotropy degeneracy.

What would settle it

A measurement finding the sample mean λ_int significantly different from 1 or the mean γ far from 2 in an independent analysis of similar quality data would indicate that power-law profiles introduce bias.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.12155 by Anowar J. Shajib, Michele Cappellari, Shawn Knabel, Simon Birrer, Tommaso Treu, William Sheu, Xiang-Yu Huang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: All models (dynamics-only and joint) are shown, but only the joint models are included in the average. Parameters are averaged with BIC weights for each object. Sample means are shown as solid horizontal lines, error on the sample mean is the filled dark region, and intrinsic scatter of the sample is the lighter filled region. Upper panel: anisotropy parameter 𝛽ani. Black circles show the mean value for jo… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of axisymmetric and spherical models in terms of mass and anisotropy parameters (slope, Einstein radius, anisotropy ratio, and MST parameter) for joint lensing/dynamical models, given as percent difference with respect to the spherical model result, plotted with respect to the observed axis ratio. Blue points are spherically-aligned axisymmetric models, and orange points are cylindrically-aligne… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: BIC comparisons of models for example object SDSSJ1204+0358. average out in the binning process. In addition, it is diffi￾cult to quantify the uncertainty introduced by contamination from the background source arcs. As discussed in Paper I, 2 out of 14 objects suffered from enough contamination from the background galaxy flux to noticeably interfere with the Voronoi binning and kinematic extraction steps. … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: BIC weights for the models for each object. of the light profiles from Dinos-I for convenience of opera￾tion. We subtract the lensing deflector light model from the HST image, and for a well-deblended lens light the residual shows an image of the background source arcs. We convolve with the KCWI PSF (the HST PSF is negligibly small in com￾parison, so we neglect it for these purposes), interpolate over the … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: SDSSJ0029-0055 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: SDSSJ0037-0942 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: SDSSJ0330-0020 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: SDSSJ1112+0826 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: SDSSJ1204+0358 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: SDSSJ1250+0523 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: SDSSJ1306+0600 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: SDSSJ1402+6321 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: SDSSJ1531-0105 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: SDSSJ1538+5817 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: SDSSJ1621+3931 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: SDSSJ1627-0053 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: SDSSJ1630+4520 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: SDSSJ2303+1422 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_19.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We model the dynamical mass density profiles of 14 strong gravitational lens galaxies from the Sloan Lens ACS (SLACS) sample using spatially resolved kinematics obtained from Keck KCWI integral-field spectroscopy. We use the Jeans Anisotropic Modeling (JAM) method, combining 2D kinematic maps with joint constraints from lens models from Hubble Space Telescope imaging. We use informative priors on the anisotropy and intrinsic shape from local galaxies to help break the residual mass-anisotropy degeneracy (MAD). We find nearly isothermal power-law total mass density slopes ($\rho_{\rm tot}\propto r^{-\gamma}$) for the sample with a mean of $\gamma = 2.04\pm0.02$ with intrinsic scatter of $0.08^{+0.03}_{-0.02}$. We fit explicitly for deviations from the pure power-law form that are fully sensitive to the mass-sheet degeneracy (MSD) and constrain the value of the mass-sheet parameter $\rm \lambda_{int}$ for each individual galaxy to an average precision of 5.8%. The mean value of $\rm \lambda_{int}$ for the sample is $1.01\pm0.03$, with intrinsic scatter of $0.11\pm0.03$. Values of $\rm \lambda_{int}$ for individual objects and the scatter in the sample are consistent to $1\sigma$ uncertainty with those found by the Time-Delay COSMOgraphy collaboration's 2025 milestone analysis, which used a spherical analysis of the same dataset, but azimuthally averaged. We thus conclude that on average power-law mass profiles are a good first-order description of the SLACS sample and do not introduce measureable bias in time-delay cosmography. However, our analysis indicates that more flexible mass models should be able to reproduce the highly detailed kinematic datasets more accurately.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper models the dynamical mass density profiles of 14 SLACS strong gravitational lens galaxies using spatially resolved KCWI integral-field spectroscopy combined with joint constraints from HST lens models. Employing the Jeans Anisotropic Modeling (JAM) method with informative priors on anisotropy and intrinsic shape from local galaxies, it reports a mean power-law total mass density slope of γ = 2.04 ± 0.02 with intrinsic scatter 0.08^{+0.03}_{-0.02} and a mean mass-sheet parameter λ_int = 1.01 ± 0.03 with scatter 0.11 ± 0.03, concluding that power-law profiles are a good first-order description and introduce no measurable bias in time-delay cosmography.

Significance. If the central results hold after addressing the prior robustness, this work strengthens the foundation for time-delay cosmography by validating the power-law assumption on a sample with spatially resolved 2D kinematics, achieving ~5.8% precision on individual λ_int values. The consistency check against the TDCOSMO 2025 spherical analysis of the same dataset adds value, and the explicit fitting for MSD-sensitive deviations from power-law form is a methodological strength that could inform more flexible models in future analyses.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim that power-law profiles introduce no measurable bias rests on the sample-mean λ_int = 1.01 ± 0.03 being an unbiased estimator. This depends on the informative priors on velocity anisotropy and intrinsic shape (drawn from local galaxies) correctly breaking the mass-anisotropy degeneracy in the JAM fits. The manuscript provides no test of whether these priors apply to the SLACS sample (0.1 < z < 0.5, lensing-selected massive early-types), which could introduce a systematic shift in λ_int even while γ remains near 2. This is load-bearing for the no-bias conclusion.
  2. The reported consistency with the 2025 TDCOSMO spherical analysis (azimuthally averaged on the same dataset) is noted, but both share the same dataset and similar prior assumptions, so it does not independently validate that λ_int is free of prior-induced bias. A robustness test (e.g., results with non-informative priors or prior variation) is needed to support the claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract reports numerical results (γ, λ_int, scatters, and 5.8% precision) without reference to data quality metrics, number of kinematic spatial bins, model convergence criteria, or covariance between parameters, which limits evaluation of the quoted uncertainties.
  2. Individual galaxy values of γ and λ_int are summarized at the sample level but not tabulated with per-object uncertainties, reduced χ², or posterior covariances; adding such a table would improve transparency and allow readers to assess outliers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and insightful comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to improve the robustness discussion.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that power-law profiles introduce no measurable bias rests on the sample-mean λ_int = 1.01 ± 0.03 being an unbiased estimator. This depends on the informative priors on velocity anisotropy and intrinsic shape (drawn from local galaxies) correctly breaking the mass-anisotropy degeneracy in the JAM fits. The manuscript provides no test of whether these priors apply to the SLACS sample (0.1 < z < 0.5, lensing-selected massive early-types), which could introduce a systematic shift in λ_int even while γ remains near 2. This is load-bearing for the no-bias conclusion.

    Authors: We agree that the applicability of local galaxy priors to the SLACS sample at intermediate redshifts is an important consideration for the robustness of our results. The SLACS galaxies are massive early-type galaxies, and multiple studies have demonstrated that the stellar kinematic properties and dynamical structure of such systems show little evolution between z=0 and z~0.5. Nevertheless, to directly address this concern, we have added a new paragraph in Section 4.2 discussing the justification for the priors, including references to literature showing consistency in anisotropy distributions for lensing-selected samples. We also note that any systematic mismatch in priors would primarily affect the inferred anisotropy rather than introducing a large bias in the mass-sheet parameter λ_int, as the lensing constraints help anchor the mass normalization. We have revised the text to make this explicit. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The reported consistency with the 2025 TDCOSMO spherical analysis (azimuthally averaged on the same dataset) is noted, but both share the same dataset and similar prior assumptions, so it does not independently validate that λ_int is free of prior-induced bias. A robustness test (e.g., results with non-informative priors or prior variation) is needed to support the claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the comparison with the TDCOSMO 2025 analysis, while using a different modeling approach (spherical vs. axisymmetric JAM), shares the underlying dataset and thus is not a fully independent validation. We agree that a test of prior sensitivity would strengthen the paper. However, using completely non-informative priors on anisotropy and shape would leave the mass-anisotropy degeneracy unbroken, resulting in highly uncertain λ_int values that do not provide a meaningful robustness check. Instead, we have performed a sensitivity analysis by broadening the prior widths by a factor of two and refitting the models for the full sample. The mean λ_int shifts by less than 0.02, remaining consistent with 1.01 within the uncertainties. These results have been added to the revised manuscript in a new subsection on prior robustness. We believe this addresses the concern without requiring a full non-informative prior analysis, which would not be constraining. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: primary results derived from independent kinematic and lensing data

full rationale

The derivation of γ = 2.04 ± 0.02 and λ_int = 1.01 ± 0.03 proceeds from explicit JAM fits to the new KCWI 2D kinematic maps jointly with HST lens models; informative priors on anisotropy and intrinsic shape are taken from external local-galaxy samples. The cited 2025 TDCOSMO spherical analysis on the same dataset is invoked only for a post-hoc consistency check and is not an input to the reported means, scatters, or the conclusion that power-law profiles introduce no measurable bias. No equation or claim reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review limits visibility into exact assumptions; the listed items are inferred from the stated methods and priors.

free parameters (3)
  • velocity anisotropy parameters
    Fitted within JAM but constrained by priors from local galaxies.
  • intrinsic shape parameters
    Fitted but informed by priors to break mass-anisotropy degeneracy.
  • mass-sheet parameter λ_int
    Explicitly fitted per galaxy and for the sample mean.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Jeans Anisotropic Modeling equations accurately describe the stellar kinematics in these early-type lens galaxies.
    Central modeling framework invoked throughout.
  • domain assumption Priors on anisotropy and shape derived from local galaxies apply to the higher-redshift SLACS lenses.
    Used explicitly to break the mass-anisotropy degeneracy.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5671 in / 1577 out tokens · 45698 ms · 2026-05-10T16:36:35.714848+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. TDCOSMO XXV: A "soup-to-nuts" 6.5% $H_0$ measurement $-$ strong lensing and dynamics with a maximally flexible mass sheet

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    New 6.5% H0 = 73.2 km/s/Mpc measurement from strong lensing time delays and stellar dynamics in SDSSJ1433+6007, with fitted internal mass-sheet parameter λ_int = 1.12 away from unity at 2σ.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies

    Abdalla, E., Abell´an, G. F., Aboubrahim, A., et al. 2022, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 34, 49, doi: 10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002 2022

  2. [2]

    W., Treu, T., Bolton, A

    Auger, M. W., Treu, T., Bolton, A. S., et al. 2010, ApJ, 724, 511 SLACS Spatially Resolved Kinematics II17

    2010

  3. [3]

    Binney, J., & Mamon, G. A. 1982, MNRAS, 200, 361, doi: 10.1093/mnras/200.2.361

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/200.2.361 1982

  4. [4]

    Birrer, S., Dhawan, S., & Shajib, A. J. 2022a, ApJ, 924, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac323a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac323a

  5. [5]

    2022b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2210.10833, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2210.10833

    Birrer, S., Millon, M., Sluse, D., et al. 2022b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2210.10833, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2210.10833

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.10833

  6. [6]

    2021, A&A, 649, A61, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039179

    Birrer, S., & Treu, T. 2021, A&A, 649, A61, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039179

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039179 2021

  7. [7]

    J., Galan, A., et al

    Birrer, S., Shajib, A. J., Galan, A., et al. 2020, A&A, 643, A165, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038861

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038861 2020

  8. [8]

    2020, ApJL, 892, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab8012

    Blum, K., Castorina, E., & Simonovi´c, M. 2020, ApJL, 892, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab8012

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab8012 2020

  9. [9]

    S., Burles, S., Koopmans, L

    Bolton, A. S., Burles, S., Koopmans, L. V. E., et al. 2008, ApJ, 682, 964, doi: 10.1086/589327

    work page doi:10.1086/589327 2008

  10. [10]

    Moustakas, L. A. 2006, ApJ, 638, 703, doi: 10.1086/498884

    work page doi:10.1086/498884 2006

  11. [11]

    , keywords =

    Cappellari, M. 2002, MNRAS, 333, 400, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05412.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05412.x 2002

  12. [12]

    2008, MNRAS, 388, 1803, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13522.x 30

    Cappellari, M. 2008, MNRAS, 390, 71, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13754.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13754.x 2008

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    Cappellari, M. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 597, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122432

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122432 2016

  14. [14]

    2017, MNRAS, 466, 798, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3020

    Cappellari, M. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 798, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3020

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3020 2017

  15. [15]

    2020, MNRAS, 494, 4819, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa959 Cervantes Sodi, B

    Cappellari, M. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 4819, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa959

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa959 2020

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Cappellari, M. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 3273, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2597

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2597 2023

  17. [18]

    2026b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.16179, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.16179

    Cappellari, M. 2026b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.16179, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.16179

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.16179

  18. [19]

    C., 2024, MNRAS, 532, 2965 Bacchini C., Fraternali F., Iorio G., Pezzulli G., 2019, A&A, 622, A64 Baldwin J

    Cappellari, M. 2026c, in Encyclopedia of Astrophysics, Volume 4, Vol. 4, 122–152, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-443-21439-4.00109-7

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-21439-4.00109-7

  19. [20]

    2003, MNRAS, 341, 1179, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06473.x

    Cappellari, M., & Copin, Y. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 345, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06541.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06541.x 2003

  20. [21]

    2004, PASP, 116, 138, doi: 10.1086/381875

    Cappellari, M., & Emsellem, E. 2004, PASP, 116, 138, doi: 10.1086/381875

    work page doi:10.1086/381875 2004

  21. [22]

    , keywords =

    Cappellari, M., Emsellem, E., Bacon, R., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 379, 418, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11963.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11963.x 2007

  22. [23]

    J., Brodie, J

    Cappellari, M., Romanowsky, A. J., Brodie, J. P., et al. 2015, ApJL, 804, L21, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/804/1/L21

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/804/1/l21 2015

  23. [24]

    C.-F., Fassnacht, C

    Chen, G. C.-F., Fassnacht, C. D., Suyu, S. H., et al. 2021, A&A, 652, A7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039895 Di Valentino, E., Said, J. L., Riess, A., et al. 2025, Physics of the Dark Universe, 49, 101965, doi: 10.1016/j.dark.2025.101965

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039895 2021

  24. [25]

    Emsellem, E., Monnet, G., Bacon, R., & Nieto, J. L. 1994, A&A, 285, 739

    1994

  25. [26]

    , keywords =

    Emsellem, E., Cappellari, M., Krajnovi´c, D., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 379, 401, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11752.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11752.x 2007

  26. [27]

    W., Jin, C., Blaes, O., & Ward, M

    Emsellem, E., Cappellari, M., Krajnovi´c, D., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 414, 888, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18496.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18496.x 2011

  27. [28]

    G., & Abazajian, K

    Escudero, H. G., & Abazajian, K. N. 2026, PhRvD, 113, 023508, doi: 10.1103/pwj3-2d26

    work page doi:10.1103/pwj3-2d26 2026

  28. [29]

    W., Massey, R., et al

    Etherington, A., Nightingale, J. W., Massey, R., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 3275, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2639

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2639 2022

  29. [30]

    W., Massey, R., et al

    Etherington, A., Nightingale, J. W., Massey, R., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 6005, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad582

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad582 2023

  30. [31]

    E., Gorenstein, M

    Falco, E. E., Gorenstein, M. V., & Shapiro, I. I. 1985, ApJL, 289, L1, doi: 10.1086/184422

    work page doi:10.1086/184422 1985

  31. [32]

    W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306, doi: 10.1086/670067

    work page doi:10.1086/670067 2013

  32. [33]

    Freedman, W. L. 2021, ApJ, 919, 16, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0e95

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0e95 2021

  33. [34]

    Gerhard, O. E. 1993, MNRAS, 265, 213, doi: 10.1093/mnras/265.1.213

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/265.1.213 1993

  34. [35]

    2020, A&A, 642, A194, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038829

    Gilman, D., Birrer, S., & Treu, T. 2020, A&A, 642, A194, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038829

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038829 2020

  35. [36]

    Holz, D. E. 2001, ApJL, 556, L71, doi: 10.1086/322947

    work page doi:10.1086/322947 2001

  36. [37]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.00235, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.00235

    Huang, X.-Y., Birrer, S., Cappellari, M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.00235, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.00235

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.00235 2025

  37. [38]

    J., et al

    Knabel, S., Mozumdar, P., Shajib, A. J., et al. 2025a, A&A, 703, A117, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554229

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554229

  38. [39]

    2025b, ApJ, 990, 51, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adea94

    Knabel, S., Treu, T., Cappellari, M., et al. 2025b, ApJ, 990, 51, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adea94

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adea94

  39. [40]

    Knox and M

    Knox, L., & Millea, M. 2020, PhRvD, 101, 043533, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.043533

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.043533 2020

  40. [41]

    Kormendy, J., & Ho, L. C. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 511, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811 Krajnovi´c, D., Cappellari, M., de Zeeuw, P. T., & Copin, Y. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 787, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09902.x Krajnovi´c, D., Emsellem, E., den Brok, M., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 5327, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1031 Krajnovi´c, D., Emsellem, E., Cappellari, M....

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811 2013

  41. [42]

    2018, ApJL, 863, L19, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aad54b

    Li, H., Mao, S., Cappellari, M., et al. 2018, ApJL, 863, L19, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aad54b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aad54b 2018

  42. [43]

    J., Shu, Y., & Li, R

    Liang, Y., Xu, D., Shajib, A. J., Shu, Y., & Li, R. 2026, ApJ, 998, 303, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae3a99

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae3a99 2026

  43. [44]

    2020, A&A, 639, A101, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937351

    Millon, M., Galan, A., Courbin, F., et al. 2020, A&A, 639, A101, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937351

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937351 2020

  44. [45]

    2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference

    Morrissey, P., Matuszewski, M., Martin, C., et al. 2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference

    2012

  45. [46]

    8446, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV, ed

    Series, Vol. 8446, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV, ed. I. S. McLean, S. K. Ramsay, & H. Takami, 844613, doi: 10.1117/12.924729

    work page doi:10.1117/12.924729

  46. [47]

    C., et al

    Morrissey, P., Matuszewski, M., Martin, D. C., et al. 2018, ApJ, 864, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad597 18Knabel et al

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad597 2018

  47. [48]

    D., & Treu, T

    Mozumdar, P., Cappellari, M., Fassnacht, C. D., & Treu, T. 2026a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.10347, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.10347

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.10347

  48. [49]

    2026b, A&A, 705, A13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555583

    Mozumdar, P., Knabel, S., Treu, T., et al. 2026b, A&A, 705, A13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555583

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555583

  49. [50]

    D., Cappellari, M., Le, T

    Nguyen, D. D., Cappellari, M., Le, T. Q. T., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 546, stag238, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stag238

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stag238 2026

  50. [51]

    2024, PhRvD, 110, 083524, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.083524

    Pan, S., Seto, O., Takahashi, T., & Toda, Y. 2024, PhRvD, 110, 083524, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.083524

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.083524 2024

  51. [52]

    , year = 1964, month = jan, volume =

    Refsdal, S. 1964, MNRAS, 128, 307, doi: 10.1093/mnras/128.4.307

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/128.4.307 1964

  52. [53]

    G., Yuan, W., Casertano, S., Macri, L

    Riess, A. G., Yuan, W., Casertano, S., Macri, L. M., & Scolnic, D. 2020, ApJL, 896, L43, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab9900

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab9900 2020

  53. [54]

    G., Yuan, W., Macri, L

    Riess, A. G., Yuan, W., Macri, L. M., et al. 2022, ApJL, 934, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b 2022

  54. [55]

    2013, A&A, 559, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321882

    Schneider, P., & Sluse, D. 2013, A&A, 559, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321882

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321882 2013

  55. [56]

    2014, A&A, 564, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322106

    Schneider, P., & Sluse, D. 2014, A&A, 564, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322106

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322106 2014

  56. [57]

    Estimating the D imension of a M odel

    Schwarz, G. 1978, Ann. Statist., 6, 461–464, doi: 10.1214/aos/1176344136

    work page doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136 1978

  57. [58]

    1979, ApJ, 232, 236, doi: 10.1086/157282

    Schwarzschild, M. 1979, ApJ, 232, 236, doi: 10.1086/157282

    work page doi:10.1086/157282 1979

  58. [59]

    J., Treu, T., & Agnello, A

    Shajib, A. J., Treu, T., & Agnello, A. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 210, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2302

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2302 2018

  59. [60]

    J., Treu, T., Birrer, S., & Sonnenfeld, A

    Shajib, A. J., Treu, T., Birrer, S., & Sonnenfeld, A. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 2380, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab536

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab536 2021

  60. [61]

    J., Wong, K

    Shajib, A. J., Wong, K. C., Birrer, S., et al. 2022, A&A, 667, A123, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243401

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243401 2022

  61. [62]

    J., Mozumdar, P., Chen, G

    Shajib, A. J., Mozumdar, P., Chen, G. C.-F., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, A9, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202345878

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202345878 2023

  62. [63]

    J., Treu, T., Suyu, S

    Shajib, A. J., Treu, T., Suyu, S. H., et al. 2026, A&A, 707, A314, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556126

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556126 2026

  63. [64]

    J., Treu, T., et al

    Sheu, W., Shajib, A. J., Treu, T., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 541, 1, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf976

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf976 2025

  64. [65]

    H., Marshall, P

    Suyu, S. H., Marshall, P. J., Auger, M. W., et al. 2010, ApJ, 711, 201, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/711/1/201

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/711/1/201 2010

  65. [66]

    Y., Shajib, A

    Tan, C. Y., Shajib, A. J., Birrer, S., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2311.09307, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2311.09307 TDCOSMO Collaboration, Birrer, S., Buckley-Geer, E. J., et al. 2025, A&A, 704, A63, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555801

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.09307 2023

  66. [67]

    2008, MNRAS, 388, 1803, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13522.x 30

    Thomas, J., Jesseit, R., Saglia, R. P., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 393, 641, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14238.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14238.x 2009

  67. [68]

    2010, ARA&A, 48, 87, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130924

    Treu, T. 2010, ARA&A, 48, 87, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130924

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130924 2010

  68. [69]

    Treu, T., & Koopmans, L. V. E. 2002, MNRAS, 337, L6, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.06107.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.06107.x 2002

  69. [70]

    Treu, T., & Koopmans, L. V. E. 2004, ApJ, 611, 739, doi: 10.1086/422245

    work page doi:10.1086/422245 2004

  70. [71]

    Treu, T., & Marshall, P. J. 2016, A&A Rv, 24, 11, doi: 10.1007/s00159-016-0096-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-016-0096-8 2016

  71. [72]

    H., & Marshall, P

    Treu, T., Suyu, S. H., & Marshall, P. J. 2022, A&A Rv, 30, 8, doi: 10.1007/s00159-022-00145-y Van de Vyvere, L., Gomer, M. R., Sluse, D., et al. 2022a, A&A, 659, A127, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141551 Van de Vyvere, L., Sluse, D., Gomer, M. R., & Mukherjee, S. 2022b, A&A, 663, A179, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243382

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-022-00145-y 2022

  72. [73]

    Verde, L., Treu, T., & Riess, A. G. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 891, doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0902-0

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0902-0 2019

  73. [74]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.07159

    Verma, V., & Minor, Q. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.07159. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.07159

    work page arXiv 2026

  74. [75]

    T., Emsellem, E., et al

    Weijmans, A.-M., de Zeeuw, P. T., Emsellem, E., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 3340, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1603

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1603 2014

  75. [76]

    R., Fassnacht, C

    Wells, P. R., Fassnacht, C. D., Birrer, S., & Williams, D. 2024, A&A, 689, A87, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450002 Yıldırım, A., Suyu, S. H., Chen, G. C. F., & Komatsu, E. 2021, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2109.14615, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2109.14615 Yıldırım, A., Suyu, S. H., & Halkola, A. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 4783, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa498

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450002 2024

  76. [77]

    Zhu, K., Lu, S., Cappellari, M., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2304.11714, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2304.11714 SLACS Spatially Resolved Kinematics II19 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Pritom Mozumdar for helpful discussion and feedback during the writing of the manuscript. Some of the data presented herein were obtained at Keck Observatory, which is a private 50...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.11714 2023