Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

An Interpretability Illusion for BERT

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.07143 v1 pith:G2VPENNR submitted 2021-04-14 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords bertillusioninterpretabilityactivationsfactwhenanalyzingappear
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We describe an "interpretability illusion" that arises when analyzing the BERT model. Activations of individual neurons in the network may spuriously appear to encode a single, simple concept, when in fact they are encoding something far more complex. The same effect holds for linear combinations of activations. We trace the source of this illusion to geometric properties of BERT's embedding space as well as the fact that common text corpora represent only narrow slices of possible English sentences. We provide a taxonomy of model-learned concepts and discuss methodological implications for interpretability research, especially the importance of testing hypotheses on multiple data sets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Sign-Aware Gated Sparse Autoencoders: Modeling Anticorrelated Features with Bi-Jump-ReLU Activations

    cs.LG 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    SA-GSAE with Bi-Jump-ReLU enables one latent to encode both polarities of anticorrelated features, Pareto-dominating or matching full-width gated SAEs while reducing dead latents by up to 500x on some LLM hookpoints.

  2. The Entanglement Wall: Activation-Space Probes as Risk Detectors, Not Context Adjudicators

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fixed activation probes keep near-ceiling accuracy on harmful-vs-benign corpus contrasts but fall to AUROC 0.59-0.69 on topic- and surface-matched harmful/benign pairs, so they behave as broad-risk detectors, not cont...

  3. Evaluating Neuron Explanations: A Unified Framework with Sanity Checks

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Most commonly used neuron explanation evaluation metrics fail two new sanity checks, and only Correlation, Cosine, AUPRC, F1-score, and IoU pass.

  4. Perspectives for Direct Interpretability in Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A perspective paper that advocates direct, post hoc interpretability for multi-agent deep reinforcement learning and offers a taxonomy of where those methods might apply.

Pith tools