REVIEW 2 cited by
XTREME-R: Towards More Challenging and Nuanced Multilingual Evaluation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Machine learning has brought striking advances in multilingual natural language processing capabilities over the past year. For example, the latest techniques have improved the state-of-the-art performance on the XTREME multilingual benchmark by more than 13 points. While a sizeable gap to human-level performance remains, improvements have been easier to achieve in some tasks than in others. This paper analyzes the current state of cross-lingual transfer learning and summarizes some lessons learned. In order to catalyze meaningful progress, we extend XTREME to XTREME-R, which consists of an improved set of ten natural language understanding tasks, including challenging language-agnostic retrieval tasks, and covers 50 typologically diverse languages. In addition, we provide a massively multilingual diagnostic suite (MultiCheckList) and fine-grained multi-dataset evaluation capabilities through an interactive public leaderboard to gain a better understanding of such models. The leaderboard and code for XTREME-R will be made available at https://sites.research.google/xtreme and https://github.com/google-research/xtreme respectively.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
skLEP: A Slovak General Language Understanding Benchmark
A nine-task Slovak-language understanding benchmark with translated and newly curated datasets, plus the first broad fine-tuned model comparison for Slovak.
-
LinguaMark: Do Multimodal Models Speak Fairly? A Benchmark-Based Evaluation
A multilingual visual question-answering benchmark across 11 languages and 5 social attributes, evaluated on 7 large multimodal models.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.