Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Practical quantum error correction with the XZZX code and Kerr-cat qubits

Quantum Physics · Submitted 19 Apr 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Our simulations show that our system is scalable below a threshold gate infidelity of $p_\mathrm{CX} \sim 6.5\%$ within a physically reasonable parameter regime, where $p_\mathrm{CX}$ is the infidelity of the noisiest gate of our system; the controlled-not gate.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2104.09539 (version 2)
Pith IDZ6KPDNCT, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAndrew S. Darmawan, Arne L. Grimsmo, Benjamin J. Brown, David K. Tuckett, Shruti Puri. "Practical quantum error correction with the XZZX code and Kerr-cat qubits." arXiv:2104.09539 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/Z6KPDNCT
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,105 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.46 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.22 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.41 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The development of robust architectures capable of large-scale fault-tolerant quantum computation should consider both their quantum error-correcting codes, and the underlying physical qubits upon which they are built, in tandem. Following this design principle we demonstrate remarkable error correction performance by concatenating the XZZX surface code with Kerr-cat qubits. We contrast several variants of fault-tolerant systems undergoing different circuit noise models that reflect the physics of Kerr-cat qubits. Our simulations show that our system is scalable below a threshold gate infidelity of $p_\mathrm{CX} \sim 6.5\%$ within a physically reasonable parameter regime, where $p_\mathrm{CX}$ is the infidelity of the noisiest gate of our system; the controlled-not gate. This threshold can be reached in a superconducting circuit architecture with a Kerr-nonlinearity of $10$MHz, a $\sim 6.25$ photon cat qubit, single-photon lifetime of $\gtrsim 64\mu$s, and thermal photon population $\lesssim 8\%$. Such parameters are routinely achieved in superconducting circuits.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The development of robust architectures capable of large-scale fault-tolerant quantum computation should consider both their quantum error-correcting codes, and the underlying physical qubits upon which they are built, in tandem. background 1.00 0.06 0.05 hedged possibility 0.59
s1 Following this design principle we demonstrate remarkable error correction performance by concatenating the XZZX surface code with Kerr-cat qubits. contribution 0.87 0.93 0.67 asserted 1.00
s2 We contrast several variants of fault-tolerant systems undergoing different circuit noise models that reflect the physics of Kerr-cat qubits. method 0.87 0.87 0.03 asserted 0.92
s3 Our simulations show that our system is scalable below a threshold gate infidelity of $p_\mathrm{CX} \sim 6.5\%$ within a physically reasonable parameter regime, where $p_\mathrm{CX}$ is the infidelity of the noisiest gate of our system; the controlled-not gate. result 1.00 0.95 0.58 asserted 1.00
s4 This threshold can be reached in a superconducting circuit architecture with a Kerr-nonlinearity of $10$MHz, a $\sim 6.25$ photon cat qubit, single-photon lifetime of $\gtrsim 64\mu$s, and thermal photon population $\lesssim 8\%$. result 0.86 0.71 0.18 asserted 0.80
s5 Such parameters are routinely achieved in superconducting circuits. interpretation 0.92 0.12 0.04 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The development of robust architectures capable of large-scale fault-tolerant quantum computation should consider both their quantum error-correcting codes, and the underlying physical qubits upon which they are built, in tandem. Following this design principle we demonstrate remarkable error correction performance by concatenating the XZZX surface code with Kerr-cat qubits. We contrast several variants of fault-tolerant systems undergoing different circuit noise models that reflect the physics of Kerr-cat qubits. Our simulations show that our system is scalable below a threshold gate infidelity of $p_\mathrm{CX} \sim 6.5\%$ within a physically reasonable parameter regime, where $p_\mathrm{CX}$ is the infidelity of the noisiest gate of our system; the controlled-not gate. This threshold can be reached in a superconducting circuit architecture with a Kerr-nonlinearity of $10$MHz, a $\sim 6.25$ photon cat qubit, single-photon lifetime of $\gtrsim 64\mu$s, and thermal photon population $\lesssim 8\%$. Such parameters are routinely achieved in superconducting circuits.

Human review
References
How later papers used it

78 later papers cite it

Evidence: some. 58 of the citing papers share no author with it, and 5 of those carry a confident label from Pith's citation classifier.

Pith read 9 of the 126 citing sentences, choosing only those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote the paraphrases from them. The summary, the counts, the evidence level, the links and the quotes come from code; the summary counts the papers listed below. A later paper is listed under a label when Pith's citation classifier gives one of its sentences that label at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check confirms the paraphrase against the sentence. This section lists uses only. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence here says nothing about how the paper has been received. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart, under "By the same authors". A quote is the citing authors' own sentence, shown when their paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0. JSON

Uses its method or tool 1 of 2 papers with this label
How the literature uses it

12 arXiv papers cite this in 29 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 20 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper
  • One could imagine a possible hardware implementation in superconducting circuits as an extension of the proposals in Refs. [ref] , stacking the proposed two-dimensional layouts in a vertical direction in an alternating ABAB pattern as illustrated in fig:architecture_sketch.

    Analog information decoding of bosonic quantum LDPC codes · Conceptional architecture · 0.99

Uses its method or tool 2 papers
Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as support 1 paper
  • Due to the ability to preserve bias, cat codes concatenated with particular stabilizer codes yield substantial increases in performance for systems whose noise is substantially biased [ref] .

    Bosonic coding: introduction and use cases · Noise-bias preservation · 1.00

Cites it as background 1 paper

What it cites · 141 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 6 papers
Uses data or values from 2 papers
Compares with 1 paper
  • In our small-scale simulations we compare the XZZX code on this layout to the tailored surface code (TSC) [ref] on the same layout and to the one-dimensional repetition code with $n=9$ qubits.

    Tailoring surface codes for highly biased noise · Small codes · 0.89

Cites as support 1 paper
  • This was demonstrated using a phenomenological noise model in Ref. [ref] .

    The XZZX Surface Code · Decoding · 0.97

Cites as background 19 papers
  • Here we describe the Kerr cat [ref] which, in our proposal, forms the elementary qubit from which the XZZX code is built.

    Engineering the quantum states of light in a Kerr-nonlinear resonator by two-photon driving · Cat qubits and bias preserving gates · 0.89

  • Here we describe the Kerr cat [ref] which, in our proposal, forms the elementary qubit from which the XZZX code is built.

    The Kerr-Cat Qubit: Stabilization, Readout, and Gates · Cat qubits and bias preserving gates · 0.89

  • While we cannot expect to reduce qubit noise arbitrarily with laboratory engineering alone, the theory of quantum error correction [ref] has shown that we can produce logical qubits that experience next-to-no noise by using a redundancy of high-quality physical qubits, provided the noise strength on the physical qubits as they perform computational operations is below some threshold value [ref] .

    Quantum memories at finite temperature · Introduction · 0.81

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.