REVIEW 2 cited by
GermanQuAD and GermanDPR: Improving Non-English Question Answering and Passage Retrieval
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
A major challenge of research on non-English machine reading for question answering (QA) is the lack of annotated datasets. In this paper, we present GermanQuAD, a dataset of 13,722 extractive question/answer pairs. To improve the reproducibility of the dataset creation approach and foster QA research on other languages, we summarize lessons learned and evaluate reformulation of question/answer pairs as a way to speed up the annotation process. An extractive QA model trained on GermanQuAD significantly outperforms multilingual models and also shows that machine-translated training data cannot fully substitute hand-annotated training data in the target language. Finally, we demonstrate the wide range of applications of GermanQuAD by adapting it to GermanDPR, a training dataset for dense passage retrieval (DPR), and train and evaluate the first non-English DPR model.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
ALoFTRAG: Automatic Local Fine Tuning for Retrieval Augmented Generation
ALoFTRAG self-generates Q&A from unlabeled RAG texts, filters them with the same local LLM, and LoRA fine-tunes to lift citation accuracy by 8.3% and answer accuracy by 3.0% on average across 26 languages.
-
A Comparative Study of Text Retrieval Models on DaReCzech
A benchmark on the Czech DaReCzech dataset finds Gemma2 most accurate, Contriever least accurate, and SPLADE/PLAID the best efficiency-quality trade-off.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.