Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Federated Tumor Segmentation (FeTS) Challenge

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.05874 v2 pith:ZDRG4ZXO submitted 2021-05-12 eess.IV cs.CV

The Federated Tumor Segmentation (FeTS) Challenge

classification eess.IV cs.CV
keywords challengefetsdatafederatedinstitutionssegmentationchallengesincluded
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This manuscript describes the first challenge on Federated Learning, namely the Federated Tumor Segmentation (FeTS) challenge 2021. International challenges have become the standard for validation of biomedical image analysis methods. However, the actual performance of participating (even the winning) algorithms on "real-world" clinical data often remains unclear, as the data included in challenges are usually acquired in very controlled settings at few institutions. The seemingly obvious solution of just collecting increasingly more data from more institutions in such challenges does not scale well due to privacy and ownership hurdles. Towards alleviating these concerns, we are proposing the FeTS challenge 2021 to cater towards both the development and the evaluation of models for the segmentation of intrinsically heterogeneous (in appearance, shape, and histology) brain tumors, namely gliomas. Specifically, the FeTS 2021 challenge uses clinically acquired, multi-institutional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans from the BraTS 2020 challenge, as well as from various remote independent institutions included in the collaborative network of a real-world federation (https://www.fets.ai/). The goals of the FeTS challenge are directly represented by the two included tasks: 1) the identification of the optimal weight aggregation approach towards the training of a consensus model that has gained knowledge via federated learning from multiple geographically distinct institutions, while their data are always retained within each institution, and 2) the federated evaluation of the generalizability of brain tumor segmentation models "in the wild", i.e. on data from institutional distributions that were not part of the training datasets.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Beyond Forgetting in Continual Medical Image Segmentation: A Comprehensive Benchmark Study

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Benchmark experiments in continual medical image segmentation reveal that no single method satisfies all clinical requirements, with replay-based approaches offering the best stability-plasticity trade-off while forwa...

  2. The RSNA-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS 2021 Benchmark on Brain Tumor Segmentation and Radiogenomic Classification

    cs.CV 2021-07 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    BraTS 2021 provides a 2,040-patient mpMRI benchmark for brain tumor sub-region segmentation and MGMT methylation classification, hosted on Synapse and Kaggle with $60,000 in awards.