Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Evolution of Wolf-Rayet stars as black hole progenitors

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics · Submitted 25 May 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Using the prescription from Nugis & Lamers the maximum stellar black hole is found to converge to a value of 20-30Msun, independent of host metallicity, however when utilising the new physically-motivated prescription from Sander & Vink there is no convergence to a maximum black hole mass value.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2105.12139 (version 1)
Pith IDPYQT6FIB, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAndreas A.C. Sander, Erin R. Higgins, Jorick S. Vink, Raphael Hirschi. "Evolution of Wolf-Rayet stars as black hole progenitors." arXiv:2105.12139 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/PYQT6FIB
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,602 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.30 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.45 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.96 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Evolved Wolf-Rayet stars form a key aspect of massive star evolution, and their strong outflows determine their final fates. In this study, we calculate grids of stellar models for a wide range of initial masses at five metallicities (ranging from solar down to just 2% solar). We compare a recent hydrodynamically-consistent wind prescription with two earlier frequently-used wind recipes in stellar evolution and population synthesis modelling, and we present the ranges of maximum final masses at core He-exhaustion for each wind prescription and metallicity Z. Our model grids reveal qualitative differences in mass-loss behaviour of the wind prescriptions in terms of "convergence". Using the prescription from Nugis & Lamers the maximum stellar black hole is found to converge to a value of 20-30Msun, independent of host metallicity, however when utilising the new physically-motivated prescription from Sander & Vink there is no convergence to a maximum black hole mass value. The final mass is simply larger for larger initial He-star mass, which implies that the upper black hole limit for He-stars below the pair-instability gap is set by prior evolution with mass loss, or the pair instability itself. Quantitatively, we find the critical Z for pair-instability (Z_PI) to be as high as 50% Zsolar, corresponding to the host metallicity of the LMC. Moreover, while the Nugis & Lamers prescription would not predict any black holes above the approx 130Msun pair-instability limit, with Sander & Vink winds included, we demonstrate a potential channel for very massive helium stars to form such massive black holes at ~2% Zsolar or below.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Evolved Wolf-Rayet stars form a key aspect of massive star evolution, and their strong outflows determine their final fates. background 1.00 0.04 0.03 asserted 1.00
s1 In this study, we calculate grids of stellar models for a wide range of initial masses at five metallicities (ranging from solar down to just 2% solar). method 0.87 0.97 0.02 asserted 0.94
s2 We compare a recent hydrodynamically-consistent wind prescription with two earlier frequently-used wind recipes in stellar evolution and population synthesis modelling, and we present the ranges of maximum final masses at core He-exhaustion for each wind prescription and metallicity Z. method 0.66 0.94 0.05 asserted 0.96
s3 Our model grids reveal qualitative differences in mass-loss behaviour of the wind prescriptions in terms of "convergence". result 0.99 0.92 0.06 asserted 1.00
s4 Using the prescription from Nugis & Lamers the maximum stellar black hole is found to converge to a value of 20-30Msun, independent of host metallicity, however when utilising the new physically-motivated prescription from Sander & Vink there is no convergence to a maximum black hole mass value. result 1.00 0.91 0.40 asserted 1.00
s5 The final mass is simply larger for larger initial He-star mass, which implies that the upper black hole limit for He-stars below the pair-instability gap is set by prior evolution with mass loss, or the pair instability itself. interpretation 0.94 0.81 0.20 hedged possibility 0.57
s6 Quantitatively, we find the critical Z for pair-instability (Z_PI) to be as high as 50% Zsolar, corresponding to the host metallicity of the LMC. result 1.00 0.95 0.12 asserted 0.99
s7 Moreover, while the Nugis & Lamers prescription would not predict any black holes above the approx 130Msun pair-instability limit, with Sander & Vink winds included, we demonstrate a potential channel for very massive helium stars to form such massive black holes at ~2% Zsolar or below. result 0.97 0.93 0.29 hedged possibility 0.56

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 0.99 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Evolved Wolf-Rayet stars form a key aspect of massive star evolution, and their strong outflows determine their final fates. In this study, we calculate grids of stellar models for a wide range of initial masses at five metallicities (ranging from solar down to just 2% solar). We compare a recent hydrodynamically-consistent wind prescription with two earlier frequently-used wind recipes in stellar evolution and population synthesis modelling, and we present the ranges of maximum final masses at core He-exhaustion for each wind prescription and metallicity Z. Our model grids reveal qualitative differences in mass-loss behaviour of the wind prescriptions in terms of "convergence". Using the prescription from Nugis & Lamers the maximum stellar black hole is found to converge to a value of 20-30Msun, independent of host metallicity, however when utilising the new physically-motivated prescription from Sander & Vink there is no convergence to a maximum black hole mass value. The final mass is simply larger for larger initial He-star mass, which implies that the upper black hole limit for He-stars below the pair-instability gap is set by prior evolution with mass loss, or the pair instability itself. Quantitatively, we find the critical Z for pair-instability (Z_PI) to be as high as 50% Zsolar, corresponding to the host metallicity of the LMC. Moreover, while the Nugis & Lamers prescription would not predict any black holes above the approx 130Msun pair-instability limit, with Sander & Vink winds included, we demonstrate a potential channel for very massive helium stars to form such massive black holes at ~2% Zsolar or below.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

4 arXiv papers cite this in 5 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 3 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.