pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2510.06741 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.SR· hep-ph

Diagnosing the Properties and Evolutionary Fates of Black Hole and Wolf-Rayet X-ray Binaries as Potential Gravitational Wave Sources for the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Network

Zi-Yuan Wang , Ying Qin , Georges Meynet , Qing-Zhong Liu , Xin-Wen Shu , Ya-Wen Xue , Liang Yuan , Jun-Qian Li
show 2 more authors
Kun Jia Han-Feng Song
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 09:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SRhep-ph
keywords black hole Wolf-Rayet binariesX-ray binariesgravitational wave sourcesbinary stellar evolutionLIGO-Virgo-KAGRAMESA simulationsaccretion efficiency
0
0 comments X

The pith

Wolf-Rayet X-ray binaries with black holes evolve into merging binary black holes with revised upper mass limits.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies detailed binary evolution calculations to three observed systems consisting of a stellar-mass black hole accreting from a Wolf-Rayet star. Using a revised accretion efficiency in the Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton framework within MESA simulations, the authors derive new upper limits on the black hole masses that are lower than prior estimates. These limits still permit the systems to evolve into binary black holes that merge within a Hubble time, making them potential sources for the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA network. For one system the black hole spin is also constrained and the companion is likely to form a lower-mass-gap black hole.

Core claim

By adopting a revised accretion efficiency within the standard Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton framework, we perform detailed binary evolution calculations using MESA to characterize the properties of IC 10 X-1, NGC 300 X-1, and Cyg X-3 at different evolutionary stages. Applying additional constraints from observed properties yields upper limits on black hole masses of ≲25 solar masses for IC 10 X-1 and ≲15 solar masses for NGC 300 X-1. Both systems form binary black holes that merge within a Hubble time except for NGC 300 X-1 at 9 solar masses, while Cyg X-3 has a black hole spin magnitude ≲0.6 and the Wolf-Rayet star forms a lower-mass-gap black hole whose binary also merges within a Hubble time.

What carries the argument

MESA binary evolution calculations incorporating a revised accretion efficiency in the Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton framework to model evolutionary stages and apply observational constraints.

If this is right

  • IC 10 X-1 is predicted to form a binary black hole merger within a Hubble time.
  • NGC 300 X-1 forms a merging binary black hole for black hole masses above 9 solar masses.
  • Cyg X-3 produces a binary black hole with spin at most 0.6 that merges within a Hubble time.
  • The Wolf-Rayet star in Cyg X-3 collapses to a lower-mass-gap black hole.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Updated mass limits may adjust estimates of how many gravitational wave events originate from this channel of binary evolution.
  • Applying the same modeling to additional observed systems could further refine predictions for detectable mergers.
  • Confirmation of lower-mass-gap black holes in such binaries would link these systems to the observed gap in black hole mass distributions.

Load-bearing premise

The revised accretion efficiency adopted within the standard Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton framework in the MESA binary evolution calculations.

What would settle it

An observational determination that the black hole mass in IC 10 X-1 exceeds 25 solar masses or in NGC 300 X-1 exceeds 15 solar masses would contradict the upper limits found in this work.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.06741 by Georges Meynet, Han-Feng Song, Jun-Qian Li, Kun Jia, Liang Yuan, Qing-Zhong Liu, Xin-Wen Shu, Ya-Wen Xue, Ying Qin, Zi-Yuan Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Comparison between the standard BHL accretion e [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Similar to Figure 1, but showing the X-ray luminosity as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The color bar represents the ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. As in Figure 4, but the color bar representing the modified accretion e [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Chemical-abundance evolution for a 40 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. As in right panel of Figure 4, but the color bar represent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Relative number abundance of carbon to helium as a function of the initial WR star mass and orbital period. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. As in Figure 11, but the color bar refers to the accreted mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. The Roche lobe filling factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. As in Figure 13, but the color bar refers to the accreted mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. As in Figure 11, but the colored dots indicate the parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. The spin (the color bar) of the second-born BH ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_19.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

IC 10 X-1, NGC 300 X-1, and Cyg X-3 constitute a unique class of X-ray binaries in which a stellar-mass black hole (BH) accretes material from a Wolf-Rayet (WR). These systems are particularly intriguing because of their short orbital periods, which make them promising progenitors of gravitational-wave (GW) sources detectable by the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA (LVK) network. Adopting a revised accretion efficiency within the standard Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton framework, we perform detailed binary evolution calculations using \texttt{MESA} to characterize their properties at different evolutionary stages and to assess their ultimate fates as potential LVK-detectable GW sources. By applying additional constraints from the observed properties of IC 10 X-1 and NGC 300 X-1, we find that the upper limits on the BH masses in these systems ($M_{\rm BH} \lesssim 25\, M_\odot$ for IC 10 X-1 and $M_{\rm BH} \lesssim 15\, M_\odot$ for NGC 300 X-1) are significantly lower than previous estimates. Both systems are expected to form binary black holes (BBHs) that will merge within a Hubble time, except in the case where the BH in NGC 300 X-1 has a mass of $9\,M_\odot$, corresponding to the lower limit inferred in a previous study using the continuum-fitting method with a relativistic slim-disc model. For Cyg X-3, we find that the BH spin magnitude is constrained to be $\lesssim$ 0.6. Moreover, the WR star in Cyg X-3 is likely to form a lower-mass-gap BH, and the resulting BBH system is also expected to merge within a Hubble time.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper models the binary evolution of three Wolf-Rayet X-ray binaries (IC 10 X-1, NGC 300 X-1, and Cyg X-3) using MESA calculations that incorporate a revised accretion efficiency inside the standard Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton framework. Applying observational constraints on X-ray luminosity, orbital period, and WR-star properties, it derives upper limits on current BH masses of ≲25 M_⊙ for IC 10 X-1 and ≲15 M_⊙ for NGC 300 X-1 (lower than prior estimates), predicts that both systems form BBHs merging within a Hubble time except for the 9 M_⊙ case in NGC 300 X-1, and constrains the BH spin in Cyg X-3 to ≲0.6 while finding that its WR star forms a lower-mass-gap BH whose resulting BBH also merges within a Hubble time.

Significance. If the revised accretion efficiency is independently justified, the work would offer concrete, observationally anchored predictions for the progenitor properties and merger timescales of potential LVK gravitational-wave sources. The detailed MESA tracks and direct application to three specific systems provide a useful bridge between current X-ray binary observations and future GW detections, with the lowered mass limits and Hubble-time merger conclusions carrying direct implications for the stellar-mass BH population.

major comments (2)
  1. [MESA binary evolution calculations] The revised accretion efficiency adopted within the Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton framework (described in the section on MESA binary evolution calculations) is load-bearing for the central claims. The upper mass limits and the Hubble-time merger predictions are obtained by running evolutionary tracks with this efficiency to match current observed properties and then extrapolating forward; the manuscript must demonstrate that the revision is motivated by independent theoretical considerations or external calibrations rather than being selected to produce the reported mass bounds, otherwise the statement that the limits are 'significantly lower than previous estimates' rests on an adjustable parameter.
  2. [Results for NGC 300 X-1] For NGC 300 X-1, the exception to the Hubble-time merger conclusion at the 9 M_⊙ lower limit (from prior continuum-fitting) should be accompanied by a quantitative sensitivity test showing how the post-WR merger timescale varies with small changes in the adopted accretion efficiency or current BH mass; without this, the robustness of the 'except in the case of 9 M_⊙' statement cannot be assessed.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from stating the numerical value (or range) of the revised accretion efficiency used in the MESA runs to allow readers to immediately gauge the modeling choice.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive major comments. We appreciate the positive assessment of the work's significance for connecting X-ray binary observations to LVK gravitational-wave sources. We address each comment below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the presentation of the accretion efficiency motivation and the robustness analysis for NGC 300 X-1.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [MESA binary evolution calculations] The revised accretion efficiency adopted within the Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton framework (described in the section on MESA binary evolution calculations) is load-bearing for the central claims. The upper mass limits and the Hubble-time merger predictions are obtained by running evolutionary tracks with this efficiency to match current observed properties and then extrapolating forward; the manuscript must demonstrate that the revision is motivated by independent theoretical considerations or external calibrations rather than being selected to produce the reported mass bounds, otherwise the statement that the limits are 'significantly lower than previous estimates' rests on an adjustable parameter.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this important observation. The revised efficiency was introduced to account for the high wind velocities and potential clumpiness in Wolf-Rayet stars, which are expected to reduce the effective accretion rate relative to the classical Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton value; this adjustment is drawn from prior theoretical and numerical work on wind accretion in massive binaries. To directly address the concern, we will expand the MESA binary evolution calculations section with an explicit subsection that cites independent hydrodynamical simulations and observational calibrations from other high-mass X-ray binaries. This will demonstrate that the efficiency choice is grounded in the literature rather than tuned to the reported mass limits. We will also add a brief discussion of how the derived upper limits respond to modest variations in the efficiency parameter. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results for NGC 300 X-1] For NGC 300 X-1, the exception to the Hubble-time merger conclusion at the 9 M_⊙ lower limit (from prior continuum-fitting) should be accompanied by a quantitative sensitivity test showing how the post-WR merger timescale varies with small changes in the adopted accretion efficiency or current BH mass; without this, the robustness of the 'except in the case of 9 M_⊙' statement cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative sensitivity test is necessary to assess the robustness of the exception noted for the 9 M_⊙ case. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph and accompanying figure in the NGC 300 X-1 results subsection. The test will show the post-WR merger timescale as a function of accretion efficiency varied by ±20 % around the adopted value and as a function of current BH mass from 9 to 12 M_⊙. This will quantify the boundary at which the merger time exceeds a Hubble time and will confirm that the exception is confined to the lowest end of the observationally allowed mass range. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; mass limits derived from external observations via MESA grid

full rationale

The paper adopts a revised accretion efficiency inside the Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton framework, runs MESA binary tracks to match observed X-ray luminosity, orbital period and WR properties of IC 10 X-1 and NGC 300 X-1, then reports upper limits on current BH mass and future merger times. These limits are obtained by feeding independent observational data into the simulation grid rather than by re-expressing a fitted parameter or self-citation as a prediction. No step reduces by construction to an author-defined input; the derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on numerical integration of binary evolution equations under a revised accretion prescription and on the assumption that observed system properties can be directly mapped onto the simulated evolutionary tracks; no new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • revised accretion efficiency
    Adopted modification to the standard Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton prescription whose specific functional form and calibration are required to produce the reported mass limits and evolutionary outcomes.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions of single-star and binary evolution physics implemented in MESA are sufficient to model the systems at all evolutionary stages.
    Invoked when performing the detailed binary evolution calculations described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5927 in / 1437 out tokens · 62701 ms · 2026-05-18T09:25:42.963355+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 94 canonical work pages · 36 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A more recent study by [23] shows that the newly implemented dynamical tides are slightly weaker than previ- ously thought, as illustrated in their Figure A.3 (Appendix A)

    highlighted inconsistencies in the implementation of dy- namical tides, particularly when compared to the framework of [22]. A more recent study by [23] shows that the newly implemented dynamical tides are slightly weaker than previ- ously thought, as illustrated in their Figure A.3 (Appendix A). With the new implementation of dynamical tides, we first id...

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    R. Abbott et al., GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run , Physical Review X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    B. P. Abbott et al., GW170817: Observation of Gravita- tional Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    B. P. Abbott et al., GW190425: Observation of a Compact Binary Coalescence with Total Mass∼3.4 M ⊙,ApJL892, L3 (2020), arXiv:2001.01761

    work page arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    Abbott et al., Observation of Gravitational Waves from Two Neutron Star-Black Hole Coalescences,ApJL915, L5 (2021), arXiv:2106.15163

    R. Abbott et al., Observation of Gravitational Waves from Two Neutron Star-Black Hole Coalescences,ApJL915, L5 (2021), arXiv:2106.15163

    work page arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    A. H. Nitz et al., 4-OGC: Catalog of Gravitational Waves from Compact Binary Mergers, Astrophys. J.946, 59 (2023), arXiv:2112.06878

    work page arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    A. G. Abac et al., Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 M ⊙ Compact Object and a Neutron Star,ApJL970, L34 (2024), arXiv:2404.04248

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Shao, On the Neutron Star/Black Hole Mass Gap and Black Hole Searches, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics22, 122002 (2022), arXiv:2210.00425

    Y . Shao, On the Neutron Star/Black Hole Mass Gap and Black Hole Searches, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics22, 122002 (2022), arXiv:2210.00425

    work page arXiv 2022

  9. [9]

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration et al., GWTC-4.0: Up- dating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Obser- vations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2508.18082 (2025), arXiv:2508.18082

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    High Mass X-ray Binaries: Future Evolution and Fate

    K. Belczynski, T. Bulik, and C. L. Fryer, High Mass X- ray Binaries: Future Evolution and Fate, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1208.2422 (2012), arXiv:1208.2422

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  11. [11]

    IC10~X-1/NGC300~X-1: the very immediate progenitors of BH-BH binaries

    T. Bulik, K. Belczynski, and A. Prestwich, IC10 X-1/NGC300 X-1: The Very Immediate Progenitors of BH-BH Binaries, As- trophys. J.730, 140 (2011), arXiv:0803.3516

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  12. [12]

    Cyg X-3: a Galactic double black hole or black hole-neutron star progenitor

    K. Belczynski et al., Cyg X-3: A Galactic Double Black Hole or Black-hole-Neutron-star Progenitor, Astrophys. J.764, 96 (2013), arXiv:1209.2658

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  13. [13]

    E. Korb, M. Mapelli, G. Iorio, G. Costa, and M. Dall’Amico, Wolf–Rayet–compact object binaries as progenitors of binary compact objects,A&A695, A199 (2025), arXiv:2410.08965

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Qin et al., Merging binary black holes formed through double-core evolution,A&A671, A62 (2023), arXiv:2301.04918

    Y . Qin et al., Merging binary black holes formed through double-core evolution,A&A671, A62 (2023), arXiv:2301.04918

    work page arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Hoyle and R

    F. Hoyle and R. A. Lyttleton, The effect of interstellar matter on climatic variation, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society35, 405 (1939)

    work page 1939

  16. [16]

    Bondi and F

    H. Bondi and F. Hoyle, On the mechanism of accretion by stars, MNRAS104, 273 (1944)

    work page 1944

  17. [17]

    Bondi, On spherically symmetrical accretion,MNRAS112, 195 (1952)

    H. Bondi, On spherically symmetrical accretion,MNRAS112, 195 (1952). 15

    work page 1952

  18. [18]

    H. J. G. L. M. Lamers, E. P. J. van den Heuvel, and J. A. Pet- terson, Stellar winds and accretion in massive X-ray binaries., A&A49, 327 (1976)

    work page 1976

  19. [19]

    D. B. Friend and J. I. Castor, Radiation driven winds in X-ray binaries., Astrophys. J.261, 293 (1982)

    work page 1982

  20. [20]

    Stellar wind accretion and accretion disk formation: applications to neutron star high mass X-ray binaries

    S. Karino, K. Nakamura, and A. Taani, Stellar wind accretion and accretion disk formation: Applications to neutron star high- mass X-ray binaries,PASJ71, 58 (2019), arXiv:1903.03455

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    The spin of the second-born black hole in coalescing binary black holes

    Y . Qin et al., The spin of the second-born black hole in coalescing binary black holes,A&A616, A28 (2018), arXiv:1802.05738

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  22. [22]

    Sciarini et al., Dynamical tides in binaries: Inconsistencies in the implementation of Zahn’s prescription,A&A681, L1 (2024), arXiv:2312.08437

    L. Sciarini et al., Dynamical tides in binaries: Inconsistencies in the implementation of Zahn’s prescription,A&A681, L1 (2024), arXiv:2312.08437

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    J. P. Zahn, Tidal friction in close binary systems.,A&A57, 383 (1977)

    work page 1977

  24. [25]

    Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA)

    B. Paxton et al., Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astro- physics (MESA),ApJS192, 3 (2011), arXiv:1009.1622

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  25. [26]

    Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Giant Planets, Oscillations, Rotation, and Massive Stars

    B. Paxton et al., Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astro- physics (MESA): Planets, Oscillations, Rotation, and Massive Stars,ApJS208, 4 (2013), arXiv:1301.0319

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  26. [27]

    Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Binaries, Pulsations, and Explosions

    B. Paxton et al., Modules for Experiments in Stellar As- trophysics (MESA): Binaries, Pulsations, and Explosions, ApJS220, 15 (2015), arXiv:1506.03146

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  27. [28]

    B. Paxton et al., Modules for Experiments in Stellar As- trophysics (MESA): Convective Boundaries, Element Diffu- sion, and Massive Star Explosions,ApJS234, 34 (2018), arXiv:1710.08424

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  28. [29]

    B. Paxton et al., Modules for Experiments in Stellar As- trophysics (MESA): Pulsating Variable Stars, Rotation, Con- vective Boundaries, and Energy Conservation,ApJS243, 10 (2019), arXiv:1903.01426

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  29. [30]

    A. S. Jermyn et al., Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astro- physics (MESA): Time-dependent Convection, Energy Conser- vation, Automatic Differentiation, and Infrastructure,ApJS265, 15 (2023), arXiv:2208.03651

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [31]

    G.-Y . Wang, Y . Shao, J.-G. He, X.-J. Xu, and X.-D. Li, IC 10 X-1: A Double Black Hole Progenitor Probably Formed through Stable Mass Transfer, Astrophys. J.974, 184 (2024), arXiv:2408.08004

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [32]

    J. M. Silverman and A. V . Filippenko, On IC 10 X-1, the Most Massive Known Stellar-Mass Black Hole,ApJL678, L17 (2008), arXiv:0802.2716

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  32. [33]

    S. G. T. Laycock, R. C. Cappallo, and M. J. Moro, Chandra and XMM monitoring of the black hole X-ray binary IC 10 X-1, MNRAS446, 1399 (2015), arXiv:1410.3417

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  33. [34]

    J. F. Steiner et al., On the Spin of the Black Hole in IC 10 X-1, Astrophys. J.817, 154 (2016), arXiv:1512.03414

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [35]

    A Survey of Local Group Galaxies Currently Forming Stars: III. A Search for Luminous Blue Variables and Other H-alpha Emission-Lined Stars

    P. Massey et al., A Survey of Local Group Galaxies Cur- rently Forming Stars. III. A Search for Luminous Blue Vari- ables and Other HαEmission-Line Stars,AJ134, 2474 (2007), arXiv:0709.1267

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  35. [36]

    J. S. Clark and P. A. Crowther, On the Wolf-Rayet counterpart to IC 10 X-1,A&A414, L45 (2004)

    work page 2004

  36. [37]

    Q. D. Wang, K. E. Whitaker, and R. Williams, An XMM- Newton and Chandra study of the starburst galaxy IC 10,MN- RAS362, 1065 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0507041

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  37. [38]

    W. N. Brandt, M. J. Ward, A. C. Fabian, and P. W. Hodge, ROSAT HRI observations of the Local Group galaxies IC 10, NGC 147 and NGC 185,MNRAS291, 709 (1997), arXiv:astro- ph/9708211

    work page arXiv 1997

  38. [39]

    G. R. Bhuvana and A. Nandi, Accretion disc dynamics in ex- tragalactic black hole X-ray binaries: a comprehensive study of M33 X-7, NGC 300 X-1, and IC 10 X-1,MNRAS536, 827 (2025), arXiv:2411.17047

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [40]

    P. A. Crowther et al., NGC 300 X-1 is a Wolf-Rayet/black hole binary,MNRAS403, L41 (2010), arXiv:1001.4616

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  40. [41]

    B. A. Binder et al., The Wolf-Rayet+Black Hole Binary NGC 300 X-1: What is the Mass of the Black Hole?, Astrophys. J.910, 74 (2021), arXiv:2102.07065

    work page arXiv 2021

  41. [42]

    A 33 hour period for the Wolf-Rayet/black hole X-ray binary candidate NGC 300 X-1

    S. Carpano et al., A 33 hour period for the Wolf-Rayet/black hole X-ray binary candidate NGC 300 X-1,A&A466, L17 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0703270

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  42. [43]

    I. I. Antokhin, A. M. Cherepashchuk, E. A. Antokhina, and A. M. Tatarnikov, Near-IR and X-Ray Variability of Cyg X-3: Evidence for a Compact IR Source and Complex Wind Struc- tures, Astrophys. J.926, 123 (2022), arXiv:2112.04805

    work page arXiv 2022

  43. [44]

    D. R. Parsignault et al., Observations of Cygnus X-3 by Uhuru, Nature Physical Science239, 123 (1972)

    work page 1972

  44. [45]

    M. L. McCollough, L. Corrales, and M. M. Dunham, Cygnus X-3: Its Little Friend’s Counterpart, the Distance to Cygnus X- 3, and Outflows/Jets,ApJL830, L36 (2016), arXiv:1610.01923

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  45. [46]

    Milky Way metallicity gradient from Gaia DR2 F/1O double-mode Cepheids

    B. Lemasle et al., Milky Way metallicity gradient from Gaia DR2 F/1O double-mode Cepheids,A&A618, A160 (2018), arXiv:1809.07352

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  46. [47]

    A. A. Zdziarski, C. Maitra, A. Frankowski, G. K. Skinner, and R. Misra, Energy-dependent orbital modulation of X-rays and constraints on emission of the jet in Cyg X-3,MNRAS426, 1031 (2012), arXiv:1205.4402

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  47. [48]

    Orbital modulation of X-ray emission lines in Cygnus X-3

    O. Vilhu, P. Hakala, D. C. Hannikainen, M. McCollough, and K. Koljonen, Orbital modulation of X-ray emission lines in Cygnus X-3,A&A501, 679 (2009), arXiv:0904.3967

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  48. [49]

    Fragos et al., POSYDON: A General-purpose Population Synthesis Code with Detailed Binary-evolution Simulations, ApJS264, 45 (2023), arXiv:2202.05892

    T. Fragos et al., POSYDON: A General-purpose Population Synthesis Code with Detailed Binary-evolution Simulations, ApJS264, 45 (2023), arXiv:2202.05892

    work page arXiv 2023

  49. [50]

    Hu et al., Formation of Fast-spinning Neutron Stars in Close Binaries and Magnetar-driven Stripped-envelope Supernovae, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2301.06402 (2023), arXiv:2301.06402

    R.-C. Hu et al., Formation of Fast-spinning Neutron Stars in Close Binaries and Magnetar-driven Stripped-envelope Supernovae, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2301.06402 (2023), arXiv:2301.06402

    work page arXiv 2023

  50. [51]

    Lyu et al., Revisiting the properties of GW190814 and its for- mation history,MNRAS525, 4321 (2023), arXiv:2308.09893

    F. Lyu et al., Revisiting the properties of GW190814 and its for- mation history,MNRAS525, 4321 (2023), arXiv:2308.09893

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [52]

    Qin et al., Stable case BB/BC mass transfer to form GW190425-like massive binary neutron star mergers,A&A691, A214 (2024), arXiv:2409.10869

    Y . Qin et al., Stable case BB/BC mass transfer to form GW190425-like massive binary neutron star mergers,A&A691, A214 (2024), arXiv:2409.10869

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [53]

    The chemical composition of the Sun

    M. Asplund, N. Grevesse, A. J. Sauval, and P. Scott, The Chemical Composition of the Sun,ARA&A47, 481 (2009), arXiv:0909.0948

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  53. [54]

    B ¨ohm-Vitense, ¨Uber die Wasserstoffkonvektionszone in Sternen verschiedener Effektivtemperaturen und Leuchtkr¨afte

    E. B ¨ohm-Vitense, ¨Uber die Wasserstoffkonvektionszone in Sternen verschiedener Effektivtemperaturen und Leuchtkr¨afte. Mit 5 Textabbildungen,ZAp46, 108 (1958)

    work page 1958

  54. [55]

    Rotating Massive Main-Sequence Stars I: Grids of Evolutionary Models and Isochrones

    I. Brott et al., Rotating massive main-sequence stars. I. Grids of evolutionary models and isochrones,A&A530, A115 (2011), arXiv:1102.0530

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  55. [56]

    Langer, K

    N. Langer, K. J. Fricke, and D. Sugimoto, Semiconvective dif- fusion and energy transport,A&A126, 207 (1983)

    work page 1983

  56. [57]

    Kippenhahn, G

    R. Kippenhahn, G. Ruschenplatt, and H. C. Thomas, The time scale of thermohaline mixing in stars,A&A91, 175 (1980)

    work page 1980

  57. [58]

    Presupernova Evolution of Rotating Massive Stars II: -- Evolution of the Surface Properties

    A. Heger and N. Langer, Presupernova Evolution of Rotating Massive Stars. II. Evolution of the Surface Properties, Astro- phys. J.544, 1016 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0005110

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  58. [59]

    Chaboyer and J

    B. Chaboyer and J. P. Zahn, Effect of horizontal turbulent dif- fusion on transport by meridional circulation.,A&A253, 173 (1992)

    work page 1992

  59. [60]

    Hu et al., A Channel to Form Fast-spinning Black Hole- Neutron Star Binary Mergers as Multimessenger Sources, As- 16 trophys

    R.-C. Hu et al., A Channel to Form Fast-spinning Black Hole- Neutron Star Binary Mergers as Multimessenger Sources, As- 16 trophys. J.928, 163 (2022), arXiv:2201.09549

    work page arXiv 2022

  60. [61]

    E. R. Higgins, A. A. C. Sander, J. S. Vink, and R. Hirschi, Evolution of Wolf-Rayet stars as black hole progenitors,MN- RAS505, 4874 (2021), arXiv:2105.12139

    work page arXiv 2021

  61. [62]

    The spin-up of contracting red supergiants

    A. Heger and N. Langer, The spin-up of contracting red super- giants,A&A334, 210 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9803005

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  62. [63]

    Langer, Coupled mass and angular momentum loss of mas- sive main sequence stars,A&A329, 551 (1998)

    N. Langer, Coupled mass and angular momentum loss of mas- sive main sequence stars,A&A329, 551 (1998)

    work page 1998

  63. [64]

    Maeder and G

    A. Maeder and G. Meynet, Stellar evolution with rotation. VI. The Eddington and Omega -limits, the rotational mass loss for OB and LBV stars,A&A361, 159 (2000), arXiv:astro- ph/0006405

    work page arXiv 2000

  64. [65]

    Hut, Tidal evolution in close binary systems.,A&A99, 126 (1981)

    P. Hut, Tidal evolution in close binary systems.,A&A99, 126 (1981)

    work page 1981

  65. [66]

    J. R. Hurley, C. A. Tout, and O. R. Pols, Evolution of binary stars and the effect of tides on binary populations,MNRAS329, 897 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0201220

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  66. [67]

    C. L. Fryer et al., Compact Remnant Mass Function: Depen- dence on the Explosion Mechanism and Metallicity, Astrophys. J.749, 91 (2012), arXiv:1110.1726

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  67. [68]

    Zevin, M

    M. Zevin, M. Spera, C. P. L. Berry, and V . Kalogera, Exploring the Lower Mass Gap and Unequal Mass Regime in Compact Binary Evolution,ApJL899, L1 (2020), arXiv:2006.14573

    work page arXiv 2020

  68. [69]

    Black Hole Spin Evolution: Implications for Short-hard Gamma Ray Bursts and Gravitational Wave Detection

    K. Belczynski, R. E. Taam, E. Rantsiou, and M. van der Sluys, Black Hole Spin Evolution: Implications for Short-Hard Gamma-Ray Bursts and Gravitational Wave Detection, Astro- phys. J.682, 474 (2008), arXiv:astro-ph/0703131

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  69. [70]

    H. M. J. Boffin and A. Jorissen, Can a barium star be produced by wind accretion in a detached binary ?,A&A205, 155 (1988)

    work page 1988

  70. [71]

    Tejeda and J

    E. Tejeda and J. A. Toal ´a, Geometric Correction for Wind Accretion in Binary Systems, Astrophys. J.980, 226 (2025), arXiv:2411.01755

    work page arXiv 2025

  71. [72]

    H. J. G. L. M. Lamers and J. P. Cassinelli, Introduction to Stellar Winds (, 1999)

    work page 1999

  72. [73]

    Bhattacharya et al., Probing the Stellar Wind of the Wolf- Rayet Star in IC 10 X-1, Astrophys

    S. Bhattacharya et al., Probing the Stellar Wind of the Wolf- Rayet Star in IC 10 X-1, Astrophys. J.944, 52 (2023), arXiv:2302.13984

    work page arXiv 2023

  73. [74]

    Hydrodynamic model atmospheres for WR stars: Self-consistent modeling of a WC star wind

    G. Gr ¨afener and W. R. Hamann, Hydrodynamic model atmo- spheres for WR stars. Self-consistent modeling of a WC star wind,A&A432, 633 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0410697

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  74. [75]

    M. I. Saladino, O. R. Pols, and C. Abate, Slowly, slowly in the wind. 3D hydrodynamical simulations of wind mass transfer and angular-momentum loss in AGB binary systems,A&A626, A68 (2019), arXiv:1903.04515

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  75. [76]

    N. I. Shakura and R. A. Sunyaev, Black holes in binary systems. Observational appearance.,A&A24, 337 (1973)

    work page 1973

  76. [77]

    J. M. Bardeen, W. H. Press, and S. A. Teukolsky, Rotat- ing Black Holes: Locally Nonrotating Frames, Energy Extrac- tion, and Scalar Synchrotron Radiation, Astrophys. J.178, 347 (1972)

    work page 1972

  77. [78]

    Understanding Compact Object Formation and Natal Kicks. IV. The case of IC 10 X-1

    T.-W. Wong et al., Understanding Compact Object Formation and Natal Kicks. IV . The Case of IC 10 X-1, Astrophys. J.790, 119 (2014), arXiv:1304.3756

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  78. [79]

    J. M. Miller et al., Relativistic Iron Emission and Disk Re- flection in Galactic Microquasar XTE J1748-288, Astrophys. J.546, 1055 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0008118

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  79. [80]

    Sen et al., X-ray emission from BH+O star binaries ex- pected to descend from the observed galactic WR+O binaries, A&A652, A138 (2021), arXiv:2106.01395

    K. Sen et al., X-ray emission from BH+O star binaries ex- pected to descend from the observed galactic WR+O binaries, A&A652, A138 (2021), arXiv:2106.01395

    work page arXiv 2021

  80. [81]

    Livio, N

    M. Livio, N. Soker, M. de Kool, and G. J. Savonije, Accre- tion from an inhomogeneous medium - III. General case and observational consequences.,MNRAS222, 235 (1986)

    work page 1986

Showing first 80 references.