Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing using the MagLim lens sample

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.13546 v2 pith:EX7NLWB5 submitted 2021-05-28 astro-ph.CO

Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing using the MagLim lens sample

A. Porredon , M. Crocce , J. Elvin-Poole , R. Cawthon , G. Giannini , J. De Vicente , A. Carnero Rosell , I. Ferrero
show 136 more authors
E. Krause X. Fang J. Prat M. Rodriguez-Monroy S. Pandey A. Pocino F. J. Castander A. Choi A. Amon I. Tutusaus S. Dodelson I. Sevilla-Noarbe P. Fosalba E. Gaztanaga A. Alarcon O. Alves F. Andrade-Oliveira E. Baxter K. Bechtol M. R. Becker G. M. Bernstein J. Blazek H. Camacho A. Campos M. Carrasco Kind P. Chintalapati J. Cordero J. DeRose E. Di Valentino C. Doux T. F. Eifler S. Everett A. Fert\'e O. Friedrich M. Gatti D. Gruen I. Harrison W. G. Hartley K. Herner E. M. Huff D. Huterer B. Jain M. Jarvis S. Lee P. Lemos N. MacCrann J. Mena-Fern\'andez J. Muir J. Myles Y. Park M. Raveri R. Rosenfeld A. J. Ross E. S. Rykoff S. Samuroff C. S\'anchez E. Sanchez J. Sanchez D. Sanchez Cid D. Scolnic L. F. Secco E. Sheldon A. Troja M. A. Troxel N. Weaverdyck B. Yanny J. Zuntz T. M. C. Abbott M. Aguena S. Allam J. Annis S. Avila D. Bacon E. Bertin S. Bhargava D. Brooks E. Buckley-Geer D. L. Burke J. Carretero M. Costanzi L. N. da Costa M. E. S. Pereira T. M. Davis S. Desai H. T. Diehl J. P. Dietrich P. Doel A. Drlica-Wagner K. Eckert A. E. Evrard B. Flaugher J. Frieman J. Garc\'ia-Bellido D. W. Gerdes T. Giannantonio R. A. Gruendl J. Gschwend G. Gutierrez S. R. Hinton D. L. Hollowood K. Honscheid B. Hoyle D. J. James K. Kuehn N. Kuropatkin O. Lahav C. Lidman M. Lima H. Lin M. A. G. Maia J. L. Marshall P. Martini P. Melchior F. Menanteau R. Miquel J. J. Mohr R. Morgan R. L. C. Ogando A. Palmese F. Paz-Chinch\'on D. Petravick A. Pieres A. A. Plazas Malag\'on A. K. Romer B. Santiago V. Scarpine M. Schubnell S. Serrano M. Smith M. Soares-Santos E. Suchyta G. Tarle D. Thomas C. To T. N. Varga J. Weller (the DES Collaboration)
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords cosmologicalgalaxiesgalaxyomegathosebackgroundbiasclustering
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Two of the most sensitive probes of the large scale structure of the universe are the clustering of galaxies and the tangential shear of background galaxy shapes produced by those foreground galaxies, so-called galaxy-galaxy lensing. Combining the measurements of these two two-point functions leads to cosmological constraints that are independent of the galaxy bias factor. The optimal choice of foreground, or lens, galaxies is governed by the joint, but conflicting requirements to obtain accurate redshift information and large statistics. We present cosmological results from the full 5000 sq. deg. of the Dark Energy Survey first three years of observations (Y3) combining those two-point functions, using for the first time a magnitude-limited lens sample (MagLim) of 11 million galaxies especially selected to optimize such combination, and 100 million background shapes. We consider two cosmological models, flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM. In $\Lambda$CDM we obtain for the matter density $\Omega_m = 0.320^{+0.041}_{-0.034}$ and for the clustering amplitude $S_8 = 0.778^{+0.037}_{-0.031}$, at 68% C.L. The latter is only 1$\sigma$ smaller than the prediction in this model informed by measurements of the cosmic microwave background by the Planck satellite. In $w$CDM we find $\Omega_m = 0.32^{+0.044}_{-0.046}$, $S_8=0.777^{+0.049}_{-0.051}$, and dark energy equation of state $w=-1.031^{+0.218}_{-0.379}$. We find that including smaller scales while marginalizing over non-linear galaxy bias improves the constraining power in the $\Omega_m-S_8$ plane by $31$% and in the $\Omega_m-w$ plane by $41$% while yielding consistent cosmological parameters from those in the linear bias case. These results are combined with those from cosmic shear in a companion paper to present full DES-Y3 constraints from the three two-point functions (3x2pt).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Emulating the nonlinear effects of modified gravity on the matter power spectrum for reconstruction

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A neural-network emulator predicts the ratio of nonlinear to linear modified-gravity matter power spectra across a 28-dimensional cosmological and MG parameter space, matching MGCAMB+ReACT to roughly 1–2%.

  2. Modeling nonlinear scales for dynamical dark energy cosmologies with COLA

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    COLA-based hybrid emulator reproduces nonlinear power spectrum boosts in w0wa models to <2% error vs EuclidEmulator2 and produces <0.3σ shifts in LSST-like cosmic shear parameter constraints.

  3. Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Redshift Calibration of the MagLim++ Lens Sample

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    DES Y6 calibrates MagLim++ lens galaxy redshift distributions to 1-2% mean accuracy using SOM-based photometric redshifts plus clustering redshifts, with uncertainties compressed into a few modes.

  4. The impact of evolving dark energy on the Weyl potential measured from the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 data

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Evolving dark energy models lower the tension in DES Y3 Weyl potential measurements with GR+ΛCDM predictions to 1.6-2.2σ by changing the theoretical background evolution.

  5. $4\times3$ Point Correlation Functions in Galaxy Surveys: Impact of Baryonic Feedback

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Baryonic feedback affects galaxy-galaxy, galaxy-shear, and shear-shear three-point correlation functions more strongly than two-point functions on small scales, reaching up to 90 percent suppression depending on redsh...

  6. New constraints on cosmic anisotropy from galaxy clusters using an improved dipole fitting method

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Galaxy cluster observations yield two preferred directions with cosmic anisotropy amplitude of about 5.3 times 10 to the minus 4 at roughly 1 sigma overall significance, though higher in the XMM-Newton subsample.

  7. Galaxy formation in modified gravity -- II. galaxy halo connection and assembly bias

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Simulations in f(R) gravity show that environment density in the HOD model reduces assembly bias effects to 2-3% at z≲0.5 in both ΛCDM and modified gravity.