Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Survey of Knowledge Tracing: Models, Variants, and Applications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.15106 v4 pith:KIMBVERA submitted 2021-05-06 cs.CY cs.LG

classification cs.CYcs.LG
keywords modelsapplicationsfieldfundamentalknowledgesurveybehavioraldata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Modern online education has the capacity to provide intelligent educational services by automatically analyzing substantial amounts of student behavioral data. Knowledge Tracing (KT) is one of the fundamental tasks for student behavioral data analysis, aiming to monitor students' evolving knowledge state during their problem-solving process. In recent years, a substantial number of studies have concentrated on this rapidly growing field, significantly contributing to its advancements. In this survey, we will conduct a thorough investigation of these progressions. Firstly, we present three types of fundamental KT models with distinct technical routes. Subsequently, we review extensive variants of the fundamental KT models that consider more stringent learning assumptions. Moreover, the development of KT cannot be separated from its applications, thereby we present typical KT applications in various scenarios. To facilitate the work of researchers and practitioners in this field, we have developed two open-source algorithm libraries: EduData that enables the download and preprocessing of KT-related datasets, and EduKTM that provides an extensible and unified implementation of existing mainstream KT models. Finally, we discuss potential directions for future research in this rapidly growing field. We hope that the current survey will assist both researchers and practitioners in fostering the development of KT, thereby benefiting a broader range of students.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CoderAgent: Simulating Student Behavior for Personalized Programming Learning with Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new LLM-based agent, CoderAgent, simulates students' iterative programming process (why, how, where, what to modify) and outperforms baselines on predicting next code edits, though gains are modest.

  2. Cuff-KT: Tackling Learners' Real-time Learning Pattern Adjustment via Tuning-Free Knowledge State Guided Model Updating

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Cuff-KT generates personalized output-layer parameters for knowledge tracing models without fine-tuning, reporting AUC improvements of about 10% and 4% under intra- and inter-learner shifts.

Pith tools