Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Isotopic analysis of 295 MeV proton scattering off $^{204,206,208}$Pb for improvement of neutron densities and radii

Nuclear Theory · Submitted 1 Jun 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The isotopic neutron radius difference between $^{206}$Pb and $^{208}$Pb was obtained as $D(r_n)=-0.012$ fm with an acceptable range of $D(r_n)=-0.03 \sim -0.006$ fm.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2106.00151 (version 1)
Pith IDNJ5MMVQZ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationYoshiko Kanada-En'yo. "Isotopic analysis of 295 MeV proton scattering off $^{204,206,208}$Pb for improvement of neutron densities and radii." arXiv:2106.00151 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/NJ5MMVQZ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,916 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.07 · states limitation 0.22 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.23 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.19 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

A new method of reaction analysis for proton elastic scattering is proposed, combining systematic analyses of nuclear structure and reactions in a series of isotopes. This method is applied to $^{204}$Pb$(p,p)$, $^{206}$Pb$(p,p)$, and $^{208}$Pb$(p,p)$ at $E_p=295$ MeV to obtain improved neutron densities and radii from experimental cross section data. The reaction calculation is performed according to the relativistic impulse approximation using the modified Murdock and Horowitz model with density-dependent effective $NN$ interaction. Analysis of Pb isotopes is performed using theoretical densities given by the relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov and nonrelativistic Skyrme Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov calculations and the experimental density extracted from the $(p,p)$ data at 295 MeV. The isotopic ratios ($R(\sigma)$) of the $^{A}$Pb$(p,p)$-to-$^{206}$Pb$(p,p)$ cross sections are analyzed in connection with the isotopic differences ($D(\rho_n)$ and $D(r_n)$) in neutron densities $(\rho_n(r))$ and radii $(r_n)$ between $^A$Pb and $^{208}$Pb. A hole-model analysis is performed, assuming $^{204}$Pb and $^{206}$Pb as a $^{208}$Pb core and neutron holes to clarify the one-to-one correspondence between isotopic structure properties such as $D(\rho_n)$ and $D(r_n)$ and the isotopic cross-section ratio. By fitting $R(\sigma)$, the values of $D(\rho_n)$ and $D(r_n)$ are extracted from the experimental $(p,p)$ cross section data with less uncertainty of the structure and reaction models. The isotopic neutron radius difference between $^{206}$Pb and $^{208}$Pb was obtained as $D(r_n)=-0.012$ fm with an acceptable range of $D(r_n)=-0.03 \sim -0.006$ fm.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 A new method of reaction analysis for proton elastic scattering is proposed, combining systematic analyses of nuclear structure and reactions in a series of isotopes. contribution 0.93 0.77 0.04 asserted 1.00
s1 This method is applied to $^{204}$Pb$(p,p)$, $^{206}$Pb$(p,p)$, and $^{208}$Pb$(p,p)$ at $E_p=295$ MeV to obtain improved neutron densities and radii from experimental cross section data. contribution 0.82 0.95 0.10 asserted 1.00
s2 The reaction calculation is performed according to the relativistic impulse approximation using the modified Murdock and Horowitz model with density-dependent effective $NN$ interaction. method 1.00 0.81 0.02 asserted 1.00
s3 Analysis of Pb isotopes is performed using theoretical densities given by the relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov and nonrelativistic Skyrme Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov calculations and the experimental density extracted from the $(p,p)$ data at 295 MeV. method 0.98 0.80 0.03 asserted 0.98
s4 The isotopic ratios ($R(\sigma)$) of the $^{A}$Pb$(p,p)$-to-$^{206}$Pb$(p,p)$ cross sections are analyzed in connection with the isotopic differences ($D(\rho_n)$ and $D(r_n)$) in neutron densities $(\rho_n(r))$ and radii $(r_n)$ between $^A$Pb and $^{208}$Pb. method 0.94 0.91 0.05 asserted 0.98
s5 A hole-model analysis is performed, assuming $^{204}$Pb and $^{206}$Pb as a $^{208}$Pb core and neutron holes to clarify the one-to-one correspondence between isotopic structure properties such as $D(\rho_n)$ and $D(r_n)$ and the isotopic cross-section ratio. method 0.96 0.93 0.04 asserted 0.97
s6 By fitting $R(\sigma)$, the values of $D(\rho_n)$ and $D(r_n)$ are extracted from the experimental $(p,p)$ cross section data with less uncertainty of the structure and reaction models. method 0.80 0.95 0.14 asserted 1.00
s7 The isotopic neutron radius difference between $^{206}$Pb and $^{208}$Pb was obtained as $D(r_n)=-0.012$ fm with an acceptable range of $D(r_n)=-0.03 \sim -0.006$ fm. result 1.00 0.95 0.72 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.89 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.63.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

A new method of reaction analysis for proton elastic scattering is proposed, combining systematic analyses of nuclear structure and reactions in a series of isotopes. This method is applied to $^{204}$Pb$(p,p)$, $^{206}$Pb$(p,p)$, and $^{208}$Pb$(p,p)$ at $E_p=295$ MeV to obtain improved neutron densities and radii from experimental cross section data. The reaction calculation is performed according to the relativistic impulse approximation using the modified Murdock and Horowitz model with density-dependent effective $NN$ interaction. Analysis of Pb isotopes is performed using theoretical densities given by the relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov and nonrelativistic Skyrme Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov calculations and the experimental density extracted from the $(p,p)$ data at 295 MeV. The isotopic ratios ($R(\sigma)$) of the $^{A}$Pb$(p,p)$-to-$^{206}$Pb$(p,p)$ cross sections are analyzed in connection with the isotopic differences ($D(\rho_n)$ and $D(r_n)$) in neutron densities $(\rho_n(r))$ and radii $(r_n)$ between $^A$Pb and $^{208}$Pb. A hole-model analysis is performed, assuming $^{204}$Pb and $^{206}$Pb as a $^{208}$Pb core and neutron holes to clarify the one-to-one correspondence between isotopic structure properties such as $D(\rho_n)$ and $D(r_n)$ and the isotopic cross-section ratio. By fitting $R(\sigma)$, the values of $D(\rho_n)$ and $D(r_n)$ are extracted from the experimental $(p,p)$ cross section data with less uncertainty of the structure and reaction models. The isotopic neutron radius difference between $^{206}$Pb and $^{208}$Pb was obtained as $D(r_n)=-0.012$ fm with an acceptable range of $D(r_n)=-0.03 \sim -0.006$ fm.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 10 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 7 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 2 papers

What it cites · 13 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 3 papers
Cites as support 1 paper
Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.