Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Human-Adversarial Visual Question Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.02280 v1 pith:PIC7JTFA submitted 2021-06-04 cs.CV cs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.CL
keywords examplesmodelsquestionstate-of-the-artadversarialansweringbenchmarkdataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Performance on the most commonly used Visual Question Answering dataset (VQA v2) is starting to approach human accuracy. However, in interacting with state-of-the-art VQA models, it is clear that the problem is far from being solved. In order to stress test VQA models, we benchmark them against human-adversarial examples. Human subjects interact with a state-of-the-art VQA model, and for each image in the dataset, attempt to find a question where the model's predicted answer is incorrect. We find that a wide range of state-of-the-art models perform poorly when evaluated on these examples. We conduct an extensive analysis of the collected adversarial examples and provide guidance on future research directions. We hope that this Adversarial VQA (AdVQA) benchmark can help drive progress in the field and advance the state of the art.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. FRAMES-VQA: Benchmarking Fine-Tuning Robustness across Multi-Modal Shifts in Visual Question Answering

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A benchmark of ten VQA datasets shows SPD wins on in-distribution and near-OOD accuracy, FTP wins on far-OOD accuracy, and question shifts dominate joint embedding shifts after fine-tuning.

Pith tools