REVIEW 1 cited by
Ruddit: Norms of Offensiveness for English Reddit Comments
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
On social media platforms, hateful and offensive language negatively impact the mental well-being of users and the participation of people from diverse backgrounds. Automatic methods to detect offensive language have largely relied on datasets with categorical labels. However, comments can vary in their degree of offensiveness. We create the first dataset of English language Reddit comments that has fine-grained, real-valued scores between -1 (maximally supportive) and 1 (maximally offensive). The dataset was annotated using Best--Worst Scaling, a form of comparative annotation that has been shown to alleviate known biases of using rating scales. We show that the method produces highly reliable offensiveness scores. Finally, we evaluate the ability of widely-used neural models to predict offensiveness scores on this new dataset.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Personalized Conversational Benchmark: Towards Simulating Personalized Conversations
PERSONACONVBENCH is a new Reddit-based benchmark showing that LLMs predict sentiment, community scores, and next replies better when given a user's multi-turn conversation history, and it releases public data and code.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.