Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Improving Unsupervised Dialogue Topic Segmentation with Utterance-Pair Coherence Scoring

Computation and Language · Submitted 12 Jun 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Experiments on three public datasets in English and Chinese demonstrate that our proposal outperforms the state-of-the-art baselines.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2106.06719 (version 1)
Pith IDX24OTLOA, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationGiuseppe Carenini, Linzi Xing. "Improving Unsupervised Dialogue Topic Segmentation with Utterance-Pair Coherence Scoring." arXiv:2106.06719 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/X24OTLOA
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,421 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.04 · controlled comparison 0.87 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.97 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Dialogue topic segmentation is critical in several dialogue modeling problems. However, popular unsupervised approaches only exploit surface features in assessing topical coherence among utterances. In this work, we address this limitation by leveraging supervisory signals from the utterance-pair coherence scoring task. First, we present a simple yet effective strategy to generate a training corpus for utterance-pair coherence scoring. Then, we train a BERT-based neural utterance-pair coherence model with the obtained training corpus. Finally, such model is used to measure the topical relevance between utterances, acting as the basis of the segmentation inference. Experiments on three public datasets in English and Chinese demonstrate that our proposal outperforms the state-of-the-art baselines.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Dialogue topic segmentation is critical in several dialogue modeling problems. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 However, popular unsupervised approaches only exploit surface features in assessing topical coherence among utterances. gap 0.90 0.06 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 In this work, we address this limitation by leveraging supervisory signals from the utterance-pair coherence scoring task. contribution 0.92 0.76 0.06 asserted 0.94
s3 First, we present a simple yet effective strategy to generate a training corpus for utterance-pair coherence scoring. method 0.93 0.95 0.02 asserted 0.98
s4 Then, we train a BERT-based neural utterance-pair coherence model with the obtained training corpus. method 0.99 0.96 0.03 asserted 0.98
s5 Finally, such model is used to measure the topical relevance between utterances, acting as the basis of the segmentation inference. method 1.00 0.88 0.06 asserted 1.00
s6 Experiments on three public datasets in English and Chinese demonstrate that our proposal outperforms the state-of-the-art baselines. result 1.00 0.96 0.88 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Dialogue topic segmentation is critical in several dialogue modeling problems. However, popular unsupervised approaches only exploit surface features in assessing topical coherence among utterances. In this work, we address this limitation by leveraging supervisory signals from the utterance-pair coherence scoring task. First, we present a simple yet effective strategy to generate a training corpus for utterance-pair coherence scoring. Then, we train a BERT-based neural utterance-pair coherence model with the obtained training corpus. Finally, such model is used to measure the topical relevance between utterances, acting as the basis of the segmentation inference. Experiments on three public datasets in English and Chinese demonstrate that our proposal outperforms the state-of-the-art baselines.

Human review
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 8 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 5 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.