Pith. sign in

REVIEW

ViTAS: Vision Transformer Architecture Search

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.13700 v2 pith:6N6XUTSQ submitted 2021-06-25 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords vitsarchitecturesearchtrainingaccuracyarchitecturesembeddingsempirically
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Vision transformers (ViTs) inherited the success of NLP but their structures have not been sufficiently investigated and optimized for visual tasks. One of the simplest solutions is to directly search the optimal one via the widely used neural architecture search (NAS) in CNNs. However, we empirically find this straightforward adaptation would encounter catastrophic failures and be frustratingly unstable for the training of superformer. In this paper, we argue that since ViTs mainly operate on token embeddings with little inductive bias, imbalance of channels for different architectures would worsen the weight-sharing assumption and cause the training instability as a result. Therefore, we develop a new cyclic weight-sharing mechanism for token embeddings of the ViTs, which enables each channel could more evenly contribute to all candidate architectures. Besides, we also propose identity shifting to alleviate the many-to-one issue in superformer and leverage weak augmentation and regularization techniques for more steady training empirically. Based on these, our proposed method, ViTAS, has achieved significant superiority in both DeiT- and Twins-based ViTs. For example, with only $1.4$G FLOPs budget, our searched architecture has $3.3\%$ ImageNet-$1$k accuracy than the baseline DeiT. With $3.0$G FLOPs, our results achieve $82.0\%$ accuracy on ImageNet-$1$k, and $45.9\%$ mAP on COCO$2017$ which is $2.4\%$ superior than other ViTs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools