REVIEW 1 cited by
Training Saturation in Layerwise Quantum Approximate Optimisation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Quantum Approximate Optimisation (QAOA) is the most studied gate based variational quantum algorithm today. We train QAOA one layer at a time to maximize overlap with an $n$ qubit target state. Doing so we discovered that such training always saturates -- called \textit{training saturation} -- at some depth $p^*$, meaning that past a certain depth, overlap can not be improved by adding subsequent layers. We formulate necessary conditions for saturation. Numerically, we find layerwise QAOA reaches its maximum overlap at depth $p^*=n$. The addition of coherent dephasing errors to training removes saturation, recovering robustness to layerwise training. This study sheds new light on the performance limitations and prospects of QAOA.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Regularizing quantum loss landscapes by noise injection
Noise injection into each parameterized Pauli gate exponentially suppresses high-frequency Fourier components of a quantum loss function, smoothing the landscape and improving optimization quality in numerical tests.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.