Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Counterfactual Explanations for Arbitrary Regression Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.15212 v1 pith:BPHM224I submitted 2021-06-29 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CC

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CC
keywords modelsregressioncounterfactualalgorithmarbitrarycfesexplanationsframework
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a new method for counterfactual explanations (CFEs) based on Bayesian optimisation that applies to both classification and regression models. Our method is a globally convergent search algorithm with support for arbitrary regression models and constraints like feature sparsity and actionable recourse, and furthermore can answer multiple counterfactual questions in parallel while learning from previous queries. We formulate CFE search for regression models in a rigorous mathematical framework using differentiable potentials, which resolves robustness issues in threshold-based objectives. We prove that in this framework, (a) verifying the existence of counterfactuals is NP-complete; and (b) that finding instances using such potentials is CLS-complete. We describe a unified algorithm for CFEs using a specialised acquisition function that composes both expected improvement and an exponential-polynomial (EP) family with desirable properties. Our evaluation on real-world benchmark domains demonstrate high sample-efficiency and precision.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Statistical Inference for Responsiveness Verification

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A sampling-based procedure estimates and statistically tests how often a model's prediction changes under realistic user-specified interventions, with exact binomial guarantees.

  2. CEL: Comprehensive Counterfactual Explanations Library and Benchmark

    cs.LG 2026-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    CEL is a unified library and evaluation protocol benchmarking 14 counterfactual explanation methods on 18 datasets, but the submitted manuscript lacks the code, metrics, and supplementary results needed to support its...

Pith tools