Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Phase-Programmable Gaussian Boson Sampling Using Stimulated Squeezed Light

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.15534 v2 pith:RJR5FB22 submitted 2021-06-29 quant-ph physics.optics

Phase-Programmable Gaussian Boson Sampling Using Stimulated Squeezed Light

classification quant-ph physics.optics
keywords quantumevidencephotonssamplingsqueezedbosonclassicalcomputational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The tantalizing promise of quantum computational speedup in solving certain problems has been strongly supported by recent experimental evidence from a high-fidelity 53-qubit superconducting processor1 and Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) with up to 76 detected photons. Analogous to the increasingly sophisticated Bell tests that continued to refute local hidden variable theories, quantum computational advantage tests are expected to provide increasingly compelling experimental evidence against the Extended Church-Turing thesis. In this direction, continued competition between upgraded quantum hardware and improved classical simulations is required. Here, we report a new GBS experiment that produces up to 113 detection events out of a 144-mode photonic circuit. We develop a new high-brightness and scalable quantum light source, exploring the idea of stimulated squeezed photons, which has simultaneously near-unity purity and efficiency. This GBS is programmable by tuning the phase of the input squeezed states. We demonstrate a new method to efficiently validate the samples by inferring from computationally friendly subsystems, which rules out hypotheses including distinguishable photons and thermal states. We show that our noisy GBS experiment passes the nonclassicality test using an inequality, and we reveal non-trivial genuine high-order correlation in the GBS samples, which are evidence of robustness against possible classical simulation schemes. The photonic quantum computer, Jiuzhang 2.0, yields a Hilbert space dimension up to $10^{43}$, and a sampling rate $10^{24}$ faster than using brute-force simulation on supercomputers.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Non-Hermitian Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    A history-decoupled Hamiltonian mapping makes non-Hermitian adiabatic quantum optimization pseudospectrally stable, achieving polynomial-time (per configuration) evolution on the CK maximum-independent-set benchmarks.

  2. High performance Boson Sampling simulation via data-flow engines

    quant-ph 2023-09 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Generalizes BB/FG permanent formula for row multiplicities with n-ary Gray codes and deploys on FPGAs to simulate 40-photon boson sampling in 60 modes at ~80 seconds per sample using 4 chips.

  3. Topological Quantum Interferometry

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Topological quantum interferometry driven by exchange Berry phase generalizes q-plate methods to arbitrary charges, using BPX as a control parameter to decompose two-photon patterns and witness dimensionality via topo...

  4. Gaussian boson sampling: Benchmarking quantum advantage

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A new classical algorithm for Gaussian boson sampling produces outputs closer to exact results than quantum experiments up to 1152 modes and scales efficiently, indicating hardware errors enable classical simulation.