Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Neural Natural Language Processing for Unstructured Data in Electronic Health Records: a Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.02975 v1 pith:GV5P4BLW submitted 2021-07-07 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords ehrsneuralelectronichealthhealthcarelanguagenaturalprocessing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs), digital collections of patient healthcare events and observations, are ubiquitous in medicine and critical to healthcare delivery, operations, and research. Despite this central role, EHRs are notoriously difficult to process automatically. Well over half of the information stored within EHRs is in the form of unstructured text (e.g. provider notes, operation reports) and remains largely untapped for secondary use. Recently, however, newer neural network and deep learning approaches to Natural Language Processing (NLP) have made considerable advances, outperforming traditional statistical and rule-based systems on a variety of tasks. In this survey paper, we summarize current neural NLP methods for EHR applications. We focus on a broad scope of tasks, namely, classification and prediction, word embeddings, extraction, generation, and other topics such as question answering, phenotyping, knowledge graphs, medical dialogue, multilinguality, interpretability, etc.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Survey: Understand the challenges of MachineLearning Experts using Named EntityRecognition Tools

    cs.IR 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A 23-respondent expert survey finds performance is the most important criterion for choosing NER tools, with cloud and local tools posing different challenges.

Pith tools