Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Top-label calibration and multiclass-to-binary reductions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.08353 v4 pith:3PYGNUK7 submitted 2021-07-18 cs.LG cs.AIstat.MEstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.MEstat.ML
keywords calibrationtop-labelconfidencebinarycalibratedmulticlassclass-wiseframework
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A multiclass classifier is said to be top-label calibrated if the reported probability for the predicted class -- the top-label -- is calibrated, conditioned on the top-label. This conditioning on the top-label is absent in the closely related and popular notion of confidence calibration, which we argue makes confidence calibration difficult to interpret for decision-making. We propose top-label calibration as a rectification of confidence calibration. Further, we outline a multiclass-to-binary (M2B) reduction framework that unifies confidence, top-label, and class-wise calibration, among others. As its name suggests, M2B works by reducing multiclass calibration to numerous binary calibration problems, each of which can be solved using simple binary calibration routines. We instantiate the M2B framework with the well-studied histogram binning (HB) binary calibrator, and prove that the overall procedure is multiclass calibrated without making any assumptions on the underlying data distribution. In an empirical evaluation with four deep net architectures on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, we find that the M2B + HB procedure achieves lower top-label and class-wise calibration error than other approaches such as temperature scaling. Code for this work is available at \url{https://github.com/aigen/df-posthoc-calibration}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Survey of Calibration Process for Black-Box LLMs

    cs.AI 2024-12 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes existing techniques for estimating and correcting confidence scores of black-box large language models into a two-step calibration process.

Pith tools