Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Analysing Cyberbullying using Natural Language Processing by Understanding Jargon in Social Media

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.08902 v1 pith:BQYXFMPW submitted 2021-04-23 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords cyberbullyingsocialmodelsplatformsmediapreprocessingabusiveaccess
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Cyberbullying is of extreme prevalence today. Online-hate comments, toxicity, cyberbullying amongst children and other vulnerable groups are only growing over online classes, and increased access to social platforms, especially post COVID-19. It is paramount to detect and ensure minors' safety across social platforms so that any violence or hate-crime is automatically detected and strict action is taken against it. In our work, we explore binary classification by using a combination of datasets from various social media platforms that cover a wide range of cyberbullying such as sexism, racism, abusive, and hate-speech. We experiment through multiple models such as Bi-LSTM, GloVe, state-of-the-art models like BERT, and apply a unique preprocessing technique by introducing a slang-abusive corpus, achieving a higher precision in comparison to models without slang preprocessing.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exploration and Evaluation of Bias in Cyberbullying Detection with Machine Learning

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Cyberbullying detection models trained on one Twitter dataset lose on average 0.222 Macro F1 when tested on another dataset.

Pith tools