Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Follow Your Path: a Progressive Method for Knowledge Distillation

Machine Learning · Submitted 20 Jul 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Experiments on both image and text datasets show that our proposed ProKT consistently achieves superior performance compared to other existing knowledge distillation methods.

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2107.09305 (version 1)
Pith ID6HJMICQ6, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationBohan Li, Hao Zhou, Lei Li, Wenxian Shi, Yuxuan Song. "Follow Your Path: a Progressive Method for Knowledge Distillation." arXiv:2107.09305 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/6HJMICQ6
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,493 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.68 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.95 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Deep neural networks often have a huge number of parameters, which posts challenges in deployment in application scenarios with limited memory and computation capacity. Knowledge distillation is one approach to derive compact models from bigger ones. However, it has been observed that a converged heavy teacher model is strongly constrained for learning a compact student network and could make the optimization subject to poor local optima. In this paper, we propose ProKT, a new model-agnostic method by projecting the supervision signals of a teacher model into the student's parameter space. Such projection is implemented by decomposing the training objective into local intermediate targets with an approximate mirror descent technique. The proposed method could be less sensitive with the quirks during optimization which could result in a better local optimum. Experiments on both image and text datasets show that our proposed ProKT consistently achieves superior performance compared to other existing knowledge distillation methods.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Deep neural networks often have a huge number of parameters, which posts challenges in deployment in application scenarios with limited memory and computation capacity. background 1.00 0.06 0.01 asserted 0.99
s1 Knowledge distillation is one approach to derive compact models from bigger ones. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 However, it has been observed that a converged heavy teacher model is strongly constrained for learning a compact student network and could make the optimization subject to poor local optima. background 0.55 0.09 0.04 hedged possibility 0.61
s3 In this paper, we propose ProKT, a new model-agnostic method by projecting the supervision signals of a teacher model into the student's parameter space. contribution 0.96 0.91 0.11 asserted 1.00
s4 Such projection is implemented by decomposing the training objective into local intermediate targets with an approximate mirror descent technique. method 1.00 0.85 0.03 asserted 1.00
s5 The proposed method could be less sensitive with the quirks during optimization which could result in a better local optimum. interpretation 0.59 0.45 0.11 hedged possibility 1.00
s6 Experiments on both image and text datasets show that our proposed ProKT consistently achieves superior performance compared to other existing knowledge distillation methods. result 1.00 0.96 0.86 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Deep neural networks often have a huge number of parameters, which posts challenges in deployment in application scenarios with limited memory and computation capacity. Knowledge distillation is one approach to derive compact models from bigger ones. However, it has been observed that a converged heavy teacher model is strongly constrained for learning a compact student network and could make the optimization subject to poor local optima. In this paper, we propose ProKT, a new model-agnostic method by projecting the supervision signals of a teacher model into the student's parameter space. Such projection is implemented by decomposing the training objective into local intermediate targets with an approximate mirror descent technique. The proposed method could be less sensitive with the quirks during optimization which could result in a better local optimum. Experiments on both image and text datasets show that our proposed ProKT consistently achieves superior performance compared to other existing knowledge distillation methods.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 22 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 4 papers
Uses data or values from 2 papers
  • We evaluate our method for sentiment classification on SST-2 [ref] , natural language inference on MNLI [ref] and QNLI [ref] , and paraphrase similarity matching on MRPC [ref] and QQP[ https://data.quora.com/First-Quora-Dataset-Release-Question-Pairs.].

    SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text · Text Classification · 0.98

  • We evaluate our method for sentiment classification on SST-2 [ref] , natural language inference on MNLI [ref] and QNLI [ref] , and paraphrase similarity matching on MRPC [ref] and QQP[ https://data.quora.com/First-Quora-Dataset-Release-Question-Pairs.].

    A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inference · Text Classification · 0.98

Compares with 5 papers
  • We compare our method with following baselines: (1) BERT + Finetune, fine-tune the BERT student on training set; (2) BERT/bi-LSTM + KD, fine-tune the BERT student or train the bi-LSTM on training set using the vanilla knowledge distillation loss [ref] ; (3) Route Constrained Optimization (RCO) [ref] , use 4 un-convergent teacher checkpoints as intermediate training targets; (4) bi-LSTM: train bi-LSTM in training set; (5) TinyBERT [ref] : match the attentions and representations of student model with teacher model on the first stage and then fine-tune by the vanilla KD loss on the second stage.

    TinyBERT: Distilling BERT for Natural Language Understanding · Text Classification · 0.91

  • We compare our method with following baselines: (1) BERT + Finetune, fine-tune the BERT student on training set; (2) BERT/bi-LSTM + KD, fine-tune the BERT student or train the bi-LSTM on training set using the vanilla knowledge distillation loss [ref] ; (3) Route Constrained Optimization (RCO) [ref] , use 4 un-convergent teacher checkpoints as intermediate training targets; (4) bi-LSTM: train bi-LSTM in training set; (5) TinyBERT [ref] : match the attentions and representations of student model with teacher model on the first stage and then fine-tune by the vanilla KD loss on the second stage.

    Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network · Text Classification · 0.91

  • CRD [ref] and RCO [ref] .

    Contrastive Representation Distillation · Image Recognition · 0.98

Cites as support 2 papers
Cites as background 6 papers
  • Knowledge distillation [ref] is an essential way in the field which refers to a model-agnostic method where a model with fewer parameters (student) is optimized to minimize some statistical discrepancy between its predictions distribution and the predictions of a higher capacity model (teacher).

    Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network · Introduction · 0.99

  • Orthogonal to output matching, many works have been conducted on matching the student model and teacher by enforcing the alignment on the latent representation [ref] .

    Patient Knowledge Distillation for BERT Model Compression · Related Work · 0.95

  • Orthogonal to output matching, many works have been conducted on matching the student model and teacher by enforcing the alignment on the latent representation [ref] .

    TinyBERT: Distilling BERT for Natural Language Understanding · Related Work · 0.95

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.