Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Learning Theorem Proving Components

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.10034 v1 pith:XEHA7A5B submitted 2021-07-21 cs.LO cs.AIcs.LGcs.NEcs.SC

classification cs.LOcs.AIcs.LGcs.NEcs.SC
keywords clausesclausecomponentsenigmaevaluationgivengraphlearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Saturation-style automated theorem provers (ATPs) based on the given clause procedure are today the strongest general reasoners for classical first-order logic. The clause selection heuristics in such systems are, however, often evaluating clauses in isolation, ignoring other clauses. This has changed recently by equipping the E/ENIGMA system with a graph neural network (GNN) that chooses the next given clause based on its evaluation in the context of previously selected clauses. In this work, we describe several algorithms and experiments with ENIGMA, advancing the idea of contextual evaluation based on learning important components of the graph of clauses.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools