Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Joint Shapley values: a measure of joint feature importance

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.11357 v2 pith:7H2OWHGT submitted 2021-07-23 stat.ML cs.AIcs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords shapleyjointvaluesfeaturefeaturesaverageeffectimportance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Shapley value is one of the most widely used measures of feature importance partly as it measures a feature's average effect on a model's prediction. We introduce joint Shapley values, which directly extend Shapley's axioms and intuitions: joint Shapley values measure a set of features' average contribution to a model's prediction. We prove the uniqueness of joint Shapley values, for any order of explanation. Results for games show that joint Shapley values present different insights from existing interaction indices, which assess the effect of a feature within a set of features. The joint Shapley values provide intuitive results in ML attribution problems. With binary features, we present a presence-adjusted global value that is more consistent with local intuitions than the usual approach.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 2 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Saliency Maps are Ambiguous: Analysis of Logical Relations on First and Second Order Attributions

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    On synthetic AND/OR/XOR datasets with perfectly accurate models, every tested saliency method sometimes ranks a truly irrelevant input above a necessary one, so the scores cannot be trusted as relevance rankings.

Pith tools