Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Red Dragon AI at TextGraphs 2021 Shared Task: Multi-Hop Inference Explanation Regeneration by Matching Expert Ratings

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.13031 v1 pith:TGVPHOQJ submitted 2021-07-27 cs.CL cs.AIcs.IR

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.IR
keywords tasksharedtextgraphsexpertexplanationinferencemulti-hopratings
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Creating explanations for answers to science questions is a challenging task that requires multi-hop inference over a large set of fact sentences. This year, to refocus the Textgraphs Shared Task on the problem of gathering relevant statements (rather than solely finding a single 'correct path'), the WorldTree dataset was augmented with expert ratings of 'relevance' of statements to each overall explanation. Our system, which achieved second place on the Shared Task leaderboard, combines initial statement retrieval; language models trained to predict the relevance scores; and ensembling of a number of the resulting rankings. Our code implementation is made available at https://github.com/mdda/worldtree_corpus/tree/textgraphs_2021

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools