REVIEW 3 cited by
CARLA: A Python Library to Benchmark Algorithmic Recourse and Counterfactual Explanation Algorithms
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Counterfactual explanations provide means for prescriptive model explanations by suggesting actionable feature changes (e.g., increase income) that allow individuals to achieve favorable outcomes in the future (e.g., insurance approval). Choosing an appropriate method is a crucial aspect for meaningful counterfactual explanations. As documented in recent reviews, there exists a quickly growing literature with available methods. Yet, in the absence of widely available opensource implementations, the decision in favor of certain models is primarily based on what is readily available. Going forward - to guarantee meaningful comparisons across explanation methods - we present CARLA (Counterfactual And Recourse LibrAry), a python library for benchmarking counterfactual explanation methods across both different data sets and different machine learning models. In summary, our work provides the following contributions: (i) an extensive benchmark of 11 popular counterfactual explanation methods, (ii) a benchmarking framework for research on future counterfactual explanation methods, and (iii) a standardized set of integrated evaluation measures and data sets for transparent and extensive comparisons of these methods. We have open-sourced CARLA and our experimental results on Github, making them available as competitive baselines. We welcome contributions from other research groups and practitioners.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
An Explainable Gaussian Process Auto-encoder for Tabular Data
A Gaussian-process autoencoder with a latent-space density estimator generates counterfactual examples for tabular data, with competitive or better scores on several evaluation metrics.
-
CEL: Comprehensive Counterfactual Explanations Library and Benchmark
CEL is a unified library and evaluation protocol benchmarking 14 counterfactual explanation methods on 18 datasets, but the submitted manuscript lacks the code, metrics, and supplementary results needed to support its...
-
Tabular Diffusion based Actionable Counterfactual Explanations for Network Intrusion Detection
A diffusion-based counterfactual explanation method for network intrusion detection, with distilled fast sampling and decision-tree global rules, is evaluated against six baselines on three NIDS datasets.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.