Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

CARLA: A Python Library to Benchmark Algorithmic Recourse and Counterfactual Explanation Algorithms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.00783 v1 pith:KX7EO6V2 submitted 2021-08-02 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords counterfactualmethodsexplanationavailablecarlaexplanationslibraryacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Counterfactual explanations provide means for prescriptive model explanations by suggesting actionable feature changes (e.g., increase income) that allow individuals to achieve favorable outcomes in the future (e.g., insurance approval). Choosing an appropriate method is a crucial aspect for meaningful counterfactual explanations. As documented in recent reviews, there exists a quickly growing literature with available methods. Yet, in the absence of widely available opensource implementations, the decision in favor of certain models is primarily based on what is readily available. Going forward - to guarantee meaningful comparisons across explanation methods - we present CARLA (Counterfactual And Recourse LibrAry), a python library for benchmarking counterfactual explanation methods across both different data sets and different machine learning models. In summary, our work provides the following contributions: (i) an extensive benchmark of 11 popular counterfactual explanation methods, (ii) a benchmarking framework for research on future counterfactual explanation methods, and (iii) a standardized set of integrated evaluation measures and data sets for transparent and extensive comparisons of these methods. We have open-sourced CARLA and our experimental results on Github, making them available as competitive baselines. We welcome contributions from other research groups and practitioners.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An Explainable Gaussian Process Auto-encoder for Tabular Data

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Gaussian-process autoencoder with a latent-space density estimator generates counterfactual examples for tabular data, with competitive or better scores on several evaluation metrics.

  2. CEL: Comprehensive Counterfactual Explanations Library and Benchmark

    cs.LG 2026-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    CEL is a unified library and evaluation protocol benchmarking 14 counterfactual explanation methods on 18 datasets, but the submitted manuscript lacks the code, metrics, and supplementary results needed to support its...

  3. Tabular Diffusion based Actionable Counterfactual Explanations for Network Intrusion Detection

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A diffusion-based counterfactual explanation method for network intrusion detection, with distilled fast sampling and decision-tree global rules, is evaluated against six baselines on three NIDS datasets.

Pith tools