Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Correcting Arabic Soft Spelling Mistakes using BiLSTM-based Machine Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.01141 v1 pith:JKVSLWKM submitted 2021-08-02 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords arabicspellingerrorsmistakessoftbilstmclasserror
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Soft spelling errors are a class of spelling mistakes that is widespread among native Arabic speakers and foreign learners alike. Some of these errors are typographical in nature. They occur due to orthographic variations of some Arabic letters and the complex rules that dictate their correct usage. Many people forgo these rules, and given the identical phonetic sounds, they often confuse such letters. In this paper, we propose a bidirectional long short-term memory network that corrects this class of errors. We develop, train, evaluate, and compare a set of BiLSTM networks. We approach the spelling correction problem at the character level. We handle Arabic texts from both classical and modern standard Arabic. We treat the problem as a one-to-one sequence transcription problem. Since the soft Arabic errors class encompasses omission and addition mistakes, to preserve the one-to-one sequence transcription, we propose a simple low-resource yet effective technique that maintains the one-to-one sequencing and avoids using a costly encoder-decoder architecture. We train the BiLSTM models to correct the spelling mistakes using transformed input and stochastic error injection approaches. We recommend a configuration that has two BiLSTM layers, uses the dropout regularization, and is trained using the latter training approach with error injection rate of 40%. The best model corrects 96.4% of the injected errors and achieves a low character error rate of 1.28% on a real test set of soft spelling mistakes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Automating Conflict-Aware ACL Configurations with Natural Language Intents

    cs.NI 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Xumi automates the full ACL configuration pipeline from natural language intents, reporting 90-98% rule translation accuracy, 3.33x more accurate conflict detection than overlap baselines, and about 40% fewer rule add...

Pith tools