REVIEW 2 cited by
Revisiting the scotogenic model with scalar dark matter
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The scotogenic model is a well motivated scenario that provides both an explanation for neutrino masses and for dark matter. We focus on a real scalar dark matter candidate in this model, produced through standard thermal freeze-out. We analyze the parameter space of the model compatible with the observed dark matter relic abundance, direct and indirect detection searches, limits from lepton flavour violating decays and constraints from the neutrino sector. As the mass differences of the dark matter with the neutral and charged states are found to be small, the new scalars and fermions of the theory will have macroscopic lifetimes, and could thus be potentially detected with long-lived particle signatures at colliders. We find regions in the parameter space to be - partially or fully - consistent with the dark matter relic abundance, and the prediction of a long-lived charged scalar or lightest neutral fermion in the scotogenic scenario, for dark matter masses below 500 GeV. We discuss on the collider phenomenology in some detail.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Coscattering Dark Matter in the Inverse Scotogenic Models
In the inverse scotogenic model, nearly degenerate Z2-odd scalars φ1 and φ2 produce the observed dark matter relic density via coscattering through either the Higgs portal or Yukawa portal, with long-lived φ2 decays g...
-
Feasibility to probe the dynamical scotogenic model at the LHC
In the dynamical scotogenic model, Drell-Yan production of fermionic dark matter could be probed at the HL-LHC for masses 100-220 GeV; scalar DM and VBF channels are unlikely to be observable.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.