Pith. Sign in

RECORD

SeeTheSeams: Localized Detection of Seam Carving based Image Forgery in Satellite Imagery

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · Submitted 28 Aug 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The proposed method is evaluated extensively on a large collection of images from different sources, demonstrating a high level of detection and localization performance across these datasets.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2108.12534 (version 1)
Pith ID367T3HTR, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationB. S. Manjunath, Chandrakanth Gudavalli, Erik Rosten, Lakshmanan Nataraj, Shivkumar Chandrasekaran. "SeeTheSeams: Localized Detection of Seam Carving based Image Forgery in Satellite Imagery." arXiv:2108.12534 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/367T3HTR
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,419 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.95 · states limitation 0.07 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.11 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.46 · mentions code or data availability 0.83.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Seam carving is a popular technique for content aware image retargeting. It can be used to deliberately manipulate images, for example, change the GPS locations of a building or insert/remove roads in a satellite image. This paper proposes a novel approach for detecting and localizing seams in such images. While there are methods to detect seam carving based manipulations, this is the first time that robust localization and detection of seam carving forgery is made possible. We also propose a seam localization score (SLS) metric to evaluate the effectiveness of localization. The proposed method is evaluated extensively on a large collection of images from different sources, demonstrating a high level of detection and localization performance across these datasets. The datasets curated during this work will be released to the public.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Seam carving is a popular technique for content aware image retargeting. background 1.00 0.03 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 It can be used to deliberately manipulate images, for example, change the GPS locations of a building or insert/remove roads in a satellite image. background 1.00 0.05 0.02 hedged possibility 0.81
s2 This paper proposes a novel approach for detecting and localizing seams in such images. contribution 1.00 0.80 0.16 asserted 0.99
s3 While there are methods to detect seam carving based manipulations, this is the first time that robust localization and detection of seam carving forgery is made possible. gap 0.62 0.77 0.35 asserted 0.99
s4 We also propose a seam localization score (SLS) metric to evaluate the effectiveness of localization. contribution 0.93 0.95 0.07 asserted 0.99
s5 The proposed method is evaluated extensively on a large collection of images from different sources, demonstrating a high level of detection and localization performance across these datasets. result 0.99 0.96 0.60 asserted 1.00
s6 The datasets curated during this work will be released to the public. contribution 0.70 0.75 0.03 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.96.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Seam carving is a popular technique for content aware image retargeting. It can be used to deliberately manipulate images, for example, change the GPS locations of a building or insert/remove roads in a satellite image. This paper proposes a novel approach for detecting and localizing seams in such images. While there are methods to detect seam carving based manipulations, this is the first time that robust localization and detection of seam carving forgery is made possible. We also propose a seam localization score (SLS) metric to evaluate the effectiveness of localization. The proposed method is evaluated extensively on a large collection of images from different sources, demonstrating a high level of detection and localization performance across these datasets. The datasets curated during this work will be released to the public.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites

Cites as support 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.