REVIEW 2 cited by
Entangled Datasets for Quantum Machine Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
High-quality, large-scale datasets have played a crucial role in the development and success of classical machine learning. Quantum Machine Learning (QML) is a new field that aims to use quantum computers for data analysis, with the hope of obtaining a quantum advantage of some sort. While most proposed QML architectures are benchmarked using classical datasets, there is still doubt whether QML on classical datasets will achieve such an advantage. In this work, we argue that one should instead employ quantum datasets composed of quantum states. For this purpose, we introduce the NTangled dataset composed of quantum states with different amounts and types of multipartite entanglement. We first show how a quantum neural network can be trained to generate the states in the NTangled dataset. Then, we use the NTangled dataset to benchmark QML models for supervised learning classification tasks. We also consider an alternative entanglement-based dataset, which is scalable and is composed of states prepared by quantum circuits with different depths. As a byproduct of our results, we introduce a novel method for generating multipartite entangled states, providing a use-case of quantum neural networks for quantum entanglement theory.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Quantum Circuit Vision: Cost-Aware Evaluation of Visual AI Agents for Quantum Code Generation
On a 132-circuit visual quantum-to-code benchmark, Claude Sonnet matches Opus accuracy at ~18% cost, depth predicts failure better than qubit count, CoT does not help, and cascade routing reaches 84% accuracy at 38% cost.
-
Quantum Computer Benchmarking: An Explorative Systematic Literature Review
A systematic review of 329 quantum benchmarking studies yields a stack-aligned taxonomy and definitions for hardware-, software-, and application-focused benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.