REVIEW 3 cited by
Massive scalar field in de Sitter spacetime: a two-loop calculation and a comparison with the stochastic approach
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We examine long-wavelength correlation functions of massive scalar fields in de Sitter spacetime. For the theory with a quartic self-interaction, the two-point function is calculated up to two loops. Comparing our results with the Hartree-Fock approximation and with the stochastic approach shows that the former resums only the cactus type diagrams, whereas the latter contains the sunset diagram as well and produces the correct result. We also demonstrate that the long-wavelength expectation value of the commutator of two fields is equal to zero both for spacelike and timelike separated points.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Towards a unified quantum field theory of dark energy and inflation: unstable de Sitter vacuum and running vacuum
The vacuum energy of quantum fields, computed exactly in de Sitter spacetime and then allowed to decay into radiation, can drive H^4-powered inflation and leave a slowly running dark energy δρ_vac ~ m_Pl^2 H^2, unifyi...
-
From the Fokker-Planck equation to perturbative QFT's results in de Sitter space
An iterative Fokker-Planck scheme reproduces the known perturbative two- and four-point correlation functions of a self-interacting spectator scalar field in de Sitter space.
-
Running Vacuum in the expanding Universe: a unified QFT paradigm for Inflation and Dark Energy
The running vacuum model derives dynamical vacuum energy from QFT in curved spacetime, using H^4 terms for inflation and H^2 terms for dark energy while G evolves logarithmically.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.