Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

TS-MULE: Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations for Time Series Forecast Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.08438 v1 pith:AMP4KZFF submitted 2021-09-17 cs.LG

TS-MULE: Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations for Time Series Forecast Models

classification cs.LG
keywords seriestimeforecastinglimelocalmodelmodelsperformances
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Time series forecasting is a demanding task ranging from weather to failure forecasting with black-box models achieving state-of-the-art performances. However, understanding and debugging are not guaranteed. We propose TS-MULE, a local surrogate model explanation method specialized for time series extending the LIME approach. Our extended LIME works with various ways to segment and perturb the time series data. In our extension, we present six sampling segmentation approaches for time series to improve the quality of surrogate attributions and demonstrate their performances on three deep learning model architectures and three common multivariate time series datasets.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. On Identifying Why and When Foundation Models Perform Well on Time-Series Forecasting Using Automated Explanations and Rating

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0

    On four public datasets, Gradient Boosting with hand-built features beat Chronos, Llama, and ARIMA on most accuracy metrics, while Chronos only led on financial sMAPE.