Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Substantive general covariance and the Einstein-Klein dispute: A Noetherian approach

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.08516 v1 pith:WZSSVHPV submitted 2021-09-16 physics.hist-ph gr-qchep-th

classification physics.hist-phgr-qchep-th
keywords generalcovariancesubstantivedisputeeinsteinnoethernoetherianrelativity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Famously, Klein and Einstein were embroiled in an epistolary dispute over whether General Relativity has any physically meaningful conserved quantities. In this paper, we explore the consequences of Noether's second theorem for this debate, and connect it to Einstein's search for a `substantive' version of general covariance as well as his quest to extend the Principle of Relativity. We will argue that Noether's second theorem provides a clear way to distinguish between theories in which gauge or diffeomorphism symmetry is doing real work in defining charges, as opposed to cases in which this symmetry stems from Kretchmannization. Finally, we comment on the relationship between this Noetherian form of substantive general covariance and the notion of `background independence'.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools