Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

DeepSTL -- From English Requirements to Signal Temporal Logic

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.10294 v4 pith:GDMJXILJ submitted 2021-09-21 cs.CL cs.SE

classification cs.CLcs.SE
keywords englishformalrequirementstranslationtechniquechallengecomplexdeepstl
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Formal methods provide very powerful tools and techniques for the design and analysis of complex systems. Their practical application remains however limited, due to the widely accepted belief that formal methods require extensive expertise and a steep learning curve. Writing correct formal specifications in form of logical formulas is still considered to be a difficult and error prone task. In this paper we propose DeepSTL, a tool and technique for the translation of informal requirements, given as free English sentences, into Signal Temporal Logic (STL), a formal specification language for cyber-physical systems, used both by academia and advanced research labs in industry. A major challenge to devise such a translator is the lack of publicly available informal requirements and formal specifications. We propose a two-step workflow to address this challenge. We first design a grammar-based generation technique of synthetic data, where each output is a random STL formula and its associated set of possible English translations. In the second step, we use a state-of-the-art transformer-based neural translation technique, to train an accurate attentional translator of English to STL. The experimental results show high translation quality for patterns of English requirements that have been well trained, making this workflow promising to be extended for processing more complex translation tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. STeP: Signal Temporal Logic for Precise Specifications for Action Generation with Vision Language Models

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A hierarchical planner where a vision-language model decomposes instructions into subtasks, compiles them into Signal Temporal Logic specifications, and uses those specifications to select, monitor, and repair low-lev...

Pith tools