REVIEW 2 cited by
A Systematic Survey of Blockchained Federated Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
With the technological advances in machine learning, effective ways are available to process the huge amount of data generated in real life. However, issues of privacy and scalability will constrain the development of machine learning. Federated learning (FL) can prevent privacy leakage by assigning training tasks to multiple clients, thus separating the central server from the local devices. However, FL still suffers from shortcomings such as single-point-failure and malicious data. The emergence of blockchain provides a secure and efficient solution for the deployment of FL. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive survey of the literature on blockchained FL (BCFL). First, we investigate how blockchain can be applied to federal learning from the perspective of system composition. Then, we analyze the concrete functions of BCFL from the perspective of mechanism design and illustrate what problems blockchain addresses specifically for FL. We also survey the applications of BCFL in reality. Finally, we discuss some challenges and future research directions.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
VerifBFL: Leveraging zk-SNARKs for A Verifiable Blockchained Federated Learning
VerifBFL uses Nova recursive zk-SNARKs to generate verifiable proofs of local model accuracy and aggregation in blockchain-based federated learning, with on-chain verification via a decentralized oracle network and di...
-
Trading Devil RL: Backdoor attack via Stock market, Bayesian Optimization and Reinforcement Learning
A data-poisoning backdoor attack on audio transformers is claimed with 100 percent success on TIMIT, but the paper provides no reproducible derivation or evaluation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.