Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Towards Continual Knowledge Learning of Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.03215 v4 pith:623PL23W submitted 2021-10-07 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords knowledgeworldcontinuallearningbenchmarkbetterever-changingforgetting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LMs) are known to encode world knowledge in their parameters as they pretrain on a vast amount of web corpus, which is often utilized for performing knowledge-dependent downstream tasks such as question answering, fact-checking, and open dialogue. In real-world scenarios, the world knowledge stored in the LMs can quickly become outdated as the world changes, but it is non-trivial to avoid catastrophic forgetting and reliably acquire new knowledge while preserving invariant knowledge. To push the community towards better maintenance of ever-changing LMs, we formulate a new continual learning (CL) problem called Continual Knowledge Learning (CKL). We construct a new benchmark and metric to quantify the retention of time-invariant world knowledge, the update of outdated knowledge, and the acquisition of new knowledge. We adopt applicable recent methods from literature to create several strong baselines. Through extensive experiments, we find that CKL exhibits unique challenges that are not addressed in previous CL setups, where parameter expansion is necessary to reliably retain and learn knowledge simultaneously. By highlighting the critical causes of knowledge forgetting, we show that CKL is a challenging and important problem that helps us better understand and train ever-changing LMs. The benchmark datasets, evaluation script, and baseline code to reproduce our results are available at https://github.com/joeljang/continual-knowledge-learning.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hatevolution: What Static Benchmarks Don't Tell Us

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Static hate speech benchmarks rank models differently from time-sensitive evaluations, with correlation coefficients near zero or negative, so high benchmark scores do not guarantee robustness to language change.

  2. Question Answering under Temporal Conflict: Evaluating and Organizing Evolving Knowledge with LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    New temporal benchmarks show LLMs struggle with outdated facts, and a structured knowledge-organization memory improves accuracy over ICL and RAG.

  3. ScienceMeter: Tracking Scientific Knowledge Updates in Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    ScienceMeter evaluates language model knowledge updates across three axes, preservation of old scientific claims, acquisition of new claims, and projection to future findings, and finds all current methods fall short.

  4. SOS-LoRA: Static Orthogonal-Subspace Low-Rank Adaptation with Fixed Multi-Scale Scaling

    cs.LG 2026-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A LoRA update split into several fixed, differently-scaled low-rank experts with orthogonal input directions improves fine-tuning accuracy at the same parameter count.

Pith tools