Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bad-Policy Density: A Measure of Reinforcement Learning Hardness

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.03424 v1 pith:JZHULHAI submitted 2021-10-07 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords learningmeasurehardnessbad-policydensityeasygeneralmany
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Reinforcement learning is hard in general. Yet, in many specific environments, learning is easy. What makes learning easy in one environment, but difficult in another? We address this question by proposing a simple measure of reinforcement-learning hardness called the bad-policy density. This quantity measures the fraction of the deterministic stationary policy space that is below a desired threshold in value. We prove that this simple quantity has many properties one would expect of a measure of learning hardness. Further, we prove it is NP-hard to compute the measure in general, but there are paths to polynomial-time approximation. We conclude by summarizing potential directions and uses for this measure.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The impact of intrinsic rewards on exploration in Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An empirical MiniGrid study shows state-counting is best for low-dimensional observations, maximum entropy is more robust with images, and DIAYN skill learning does not aid exploration.

Pith tools