Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Causal Discovery from Conditionally Stationary Time Series

Machine Learning · Submitted 12 Oct 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Empirical experiments on nonlinear particle interaction data and gene regulatory networks demonstrate SDCI's superior performance over baseline causal discovery methods.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2110.06257 (version 4)
Pith ID3G3B2HQM, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationCarles Balsells-Rodas, Gabriele Schweikert, Hedvig Kjellstrom, Ruibo Tu, Tanmayee Narendra, Xavier Sumba, Yingzhen Li. "Causal Discovery from Conditionally Stationary Time Series." arXiv:2110.06257 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/3G3B2HQM
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,982 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.07 · states limitation 0.13 · human participants 0.09 · controlled comparison 0.91 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.97 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v4. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Causal discovery, i.e., inferring underlying causal relationships from observational data, is highly challenging for AI systems. In a time series modeling context, traditional causal discovery methods mainly consider constrained scenarios with fully observed variables and/or data from stationary time-series. We develop a causal discovery approach to handle a wide class of nonstationary time series that are conditionally stationary, where the nonstationary behaviour is modeled as stationarity conditioned on a set of latent state variables. Named State-Dependent Causal Inference (SDCI), our approach is able to recover the underlying causal dependencies, with provable identifiablity for the state-dependent causal structures. Empirical experiments on nonlinear particle interaction data and gene regulatory networks demonstrate SDCI's superior performance over baseline causal discovery methods. Improved results over non-causal RNNs on modeling NBA player movements demonstrate the potential of our method and motivate the use of causality-driven methods for forecasting.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Causal discovery, i.e., inferring underlying causal relationships from observational data, is highly challenging for AI systems. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 In a time series modeling context, traditional causal discovery methods mainly consider constrained scenarios with fully observed variables and/or data from stationary time-series. background 0.70 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 We develop a causal discovery approach to handle a wide class of nonstationary time series that are conditionally stationary, where the nonstationary behaviour is modeled as stationarity conditioned on a set of latent state variables. contribution 0.77 0.93 0.19 asserted 1.00
s3 Named State-Dependent Causal Inference (SDCI), our approach is able to recover the underlying causal dependencies, with provable identifiablity for the state-dependent causal structures. contribution 0.78 0.93 0.35 asserted 1.00
s4 Empirical experiments on nonlinear particle interaction data and gene regulatory networks demonstrate SDCI's superior performance over baseline causal discovery methods. result 1.00 0.95 0.34 asserted 1.00
s5 Improved results over non-causal RNNs on modeling NBA player movements demonstrate the potential of our method and motivate the use of causality-driven methods for forecasting. interpretation 0.71 0.91 0.13 asserted 0.92

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.46.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v4
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Causal discovery, i.e., inferring underlying causal relationships from observational data, is highly challenging for AI systems. In a time series modeling context, traditional causal discovery methods mainly consider constrained scenarios with fully observed variables and/or data from stationary time-series. We develop a causal discovery approach to handle a wide class of nonstationary time series that are conditionally stationary, where the nonstationary behaviour is modeled as stationarity conditioned on a set of latent state variables. Named State-Dependent Causal Inference (SDCI), our approach is able to recover the underlying causal dependencies, with provable identifiablity for the state-dependent causal structures. Empirical experiments on nonlinear particle interaction data and gene regulatory networks demonstrate SDCI's superior performance over baseline causal discovery methods. Improved results over non-causal RNNs on modeling NBA player movements demonstrate the potential of our method and motivate the use of causality-driven methods for forecasting.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 4 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites it as background 1 paper

What it cites

Cites as background 1 paper
  • Other practical issues consist on the existence of latent confounders [ref] , the presence of measurement error [ref] or considering observations with missing data [ref] .

    Multiple Causal Inference with Latent Confounding · Related work · 0.88

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.