Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Graph-less Neural Networks: Teaching Old MLPs New Tricks via Distillation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.08727 v2 pith:UARF3GO2 submitted 2021-10-17 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords gnnsmlpsdependencygraphfasterglnnsinferencenetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are popular for graph machine learning and have shown great results on wide node classification tasks. Yet, they are less popular for practical deployments in the industry owing to their scalability challenges incurred by data dependency. Namely, GNN inference depends on neighbor nodes multiple hops away from the target, and fetching them burdens latency-constrained applications. Existing inference acceleration methods like pruning and quantization can speed up GNNs by reducing Multiplication-and-ACcumulation (MAC) operations, but the improvements are limited given the data dependency is not resolved. Conversely, multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs) have no graph dependency and infer much faster than GNNs, even though they are less accurate than GNNs for node classification in general. Motivated by these complementary strengths and weaknesses, we bring GNNs and MLPs together via knowledge distillation (KD). Our work shows that the performance of MLPs can be improved by large margins with GNN KD. We call the distilled MLPs Graph-less Neural Networks (GLNNs) as they have no inference graph dependency. We show that GLNNs with competitive accuracy infer faster than GNNs by 146X-273X and faster than other acceleration methods by 14X-27X. Under a production setting involving both transductive and inductive predictions across 7 datasets, GLNN accuracies improve over stand-alone MLPs by 12.36% on average and match GNNs on 6/7 datasets. Comprehensive analysis shows when and why GLNNs can achieve competitive accuracies to GNNs and suggests GLNN as a handy choice for latency-constrained applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Cross-Resolution Semantic Learning for Graph Domain Adaptation

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CReSL improves graph domain adaptation by learning cross-resolution source-to-target routing and grafting target representations toward source class prototypes.

  2. NOCL: Node-Oriented Conceptualization LLM for Graph Tasks without Message Passing

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    NOCL lets an LLM handle node, edge, and graph tasks on text and non-text graphs by compressing each node's description into one semantic embedding and turning the graph into a text prompt.

Pith tools