Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Adapting Membership Inference Attacks to GNN for Graph Classification: Approaches and Implications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.08760 v1 pith:XQ4VBJJN submitted 2021-10-17 cs.LG cs.CR

classification cs.LGcs.CR
keywords attacksgnnsgraphmembershipnetworksclassificationmodelstraining
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are widely adopted to analyse non-Euclidean data, such as chemical networks, brain networks, and social networks, modelling complex relationships and interdependency between objects. Recently, Membership Inference Attack (MIA) against GNNs raises severe privacy concerns, where training data can be leaked from trained GNN models. However, prior studies focus on inferring the membership of only the components in a graph, e.g., an individual node or edge. How to infer the membership of an entire graph record is yet to be explored. In this paper, we take the first step in MIA against GNNs for graph-level classification. Our objective is to infer whether a graph sample has been used for training a GNN model. We present and implement two types of attacks, i.e., training-based attacks and threshold-based attacks from different adversarial capabilities. We perform comprehensive experiments to evaluate our attacks in seven real-world datasets using five representative GNN models. Both our attacks are shown effective and can achieve high performance, i.e., reaching over 0.7 attack F1 scores in most cases. Furthermore, we analyse the implications behind the MIA against GNNs. Our findings confirm that GNNs can be even more vulnerable to MIA than the models with non-graph structures. And unlike the node-level classifier, MIAs on graph-level classification tasks are more co-related with the overfitting level of GNNs rather than the statistic property of their training graphs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A new membership inference attack that spots memorization in generative and predictive models: Loss-Based with Reference Model algorithm (LBRM)

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    LBRM classifies a time series as training data when a target model's imputation loss is much smaller than a reference model's loss.

Pith tools