Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Towards General Deep Leakage in Federated Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.09074 v2 pith:7ITVJO7P submitted 2021-10-18 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords imagetrainingbatchlabelapproachdataattackcorresponding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Unlike traditional central training, federated learning (FL) improves the performance of the global model by sharing and aggregating local models rather than local data to protect the users' privacy. Although this training approach appears secure, some research has demonstrated that an attacker can still recover private data based on the shared gradient information. This on-the-fly reconstruction attack deserves to be studied in depth because it can occur at any stage of training, whether at the beginning or at the end of model training; no relevant dataset is required and no additional models need to be trained. We break through some unrealistic assumptions and limitations to apply this reconstruction attack in a broader range of scenarios. We propose methods that can reconstruct the training data from shared gradients or weights, corresponding to the FedSGD and FedAvg usage scenarios, respectively. We propose a zero-shot approach to restore labels even if there are duplicate labels in the batch. We study the relationship between the label and image restoration. We find that image restoration fails even if there is only one incorrectly inferred label in the batch; we also find that when batch images have the same label, the corresponding image is restored as a fusion of that class of images. Our approaches are evaluated on classic image benchmarks, including CIFAR-10 and ImageNet. The batch size, image quality, and the adaptability of the label distribution of our approach exceed those of GradInversion, the state-of-the-art.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DRAUN: An Algorithm-Agnostic Data Reconstruction Attack on Federated Unlearning Systems

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DRAUN reconstructs unlearned client images from federated unlearning updates by simulating possible unlearning losses and matching gradients, exposing privacy leakage in optimization-based federated unlearning.

  2. AdaDPIGU: Differentially Private SGD with Adaptive Clipping and Importance-Based Gradient Updates for Deep Neural Networks

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A DP-SGD variant using top-60% gradient sparsification and coordinate-wise adaptive clipping is proposed; its privacy guarantee is not established for the actual algorithm because the mask comes from private data.

Pith tools