Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Quantum Algorithms and Lower Bounds for Linear Regression with Norm Constraints

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.13086 v2 pith:45QPSB32 submitted 2021-10-25 quant-ph cs.CCcs.DScs.LG

classification quant-phcs.CCcs.DScs.LG
keywords lassoquantumalgorithmslinearlowernormridgebest
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Lasso and Ridge are important minimization problems in machine learning and statistics. They are versions of linear regression with squared loss where the vector $\theta\in\mathbb{R}^d$ of coefficients is constrained in either $\ell_1$-norm (for Lasso) or in $\ell_2$-norm (for Ridge). We study the complexity of quantum algorithms for finding $\varepsilon$-minimizers for these minimization problems. We show that for Lasso we can get a quadratic quantum speedup in terms of $d$ by speeding up the cost-per-iteration of the Frank-Wolfe algorithm, while for Ridge the best quantum algorithms are linear in $d$, as are the best classical algorithms. As a byproduct of our quantum lower bound for Lasso, we also prove the first classical lower bound for Lasso that is tight up to polylog-factors.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum Learning with Tunable Loss Functions

    quant-ph 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Proposes QTERM for quantum process learning, but the proof rests on an incorrect equality E[e^{γY}] = e^{γE[Y]} for measurement bits, invalidating the sample complexity and PAC claims.

Pith tools