Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Sea quark contributions to the electromagnetic form factors of $\Sigma$ hyperons

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 25 Oct 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim $G_{\Sigma^{-}}^{u}$ and $G_{\Sigma^{+}}^{d}$ could be priority observables for the examination of sea quark contributions to baryon structure because these quantities are much larger than the strange form factors of nucleon.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2110.13089 (version 1)
Pith IDB75VDII2, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationMingyang Yang, Ping Wang. "Sea quark contributions to the electromagnetic form factors of $\Sigma$ hyperons." arXiv:2110.13089 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/B75VDII2
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,990 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.15 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.10 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.48 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We study the sea quark contributions to the electromagnetic form factors of $\Sigma$ baryons with nonlocal chiral effective theory. Both octet and decuplet intermediate states are included in the one loop calculation. $G_{\Sigma^{-}}^{u}$ and $G_{\Sigma^{+}}^{d}$ could be priority observables for the examination of sea quark contributions to baryon structure because these quantities are much larger than the strange form factors of nucleon. It will be less difficult for lattice simulation to determine the sign of these pure sea quark contributions unambiguously. In $\Sigma^0$, the light sea quark form factors $G_{\Sigma^{0}}^{u}$ and $G_{\Sigma^{0}}^{d}$ are identical. Since the light sea quark form factors in proton are different, it will be more meaningful to compare lattice result of the light sea quark form factors in $\Sigma^0$ with that obtained from effective field theory.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We study the sea quark contributions to the electromagnetic form factors of $\Sigma$ baryons with nonlocal chiral effective theory. contribution 1.00 0.92 0.06 asserted 0.87
s1 Both octet and decuplet intermediate states are included in the one loop calculation. method 0.99 0.84 0.04 asserted 1.00
s2 $G_{\Sigma^{-}}^{u}$ and $G_{\Sigma^{+}}^{d}$ could be priority observables for the examination of sea quark contributions to baryon structure because these quantities are much larger than the strange form factors of nucleon. interpretation 0.61 0.53 0.40 hedged possibility 1.00
s3 It will be less difficult for lattice simulation to determine the sign of these pure sea quark contributions unambiguously. interpretation 0.74 0.13 0.10 hedged possibility 0.68
s4 In $\Sigma^0$, the light sea quark form factors $G_{\Sigma^{0}}^{u}$ and $G_{\Sigma^{0}}^{d}$ are identical. result 1.00 0.76 0.10 asserted 1.00
s5 Since the light sea quark form factors in proton are different, it will be more meaningful to compare lattice result of the light sea quark form factors in $\Sigma^0$ with that obtained from effective field theory. interpretation 0.70 0.17 0.11 asserted 0.76

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.59.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We study the sea quark contributions to the electromagnetic form factors of $\Sigma$ baryons with nonlocal chiral effective theory. Both octet and decuplet intermediate states are included in the one loop calculation. $G_{\Sigma^{-}}^{u}$ and $G_{\Sigma^{+}}^{d}$ could be priority observables for the examination of sea quark contributions to baryon structure because these quantities are much larger than the strange form factors of nucleon. It will be less difficult for lattice simulation to determine the sign of these pure sea quark contributions unambiguously. In $\Sigma^0$, the light sea quark form factors $G_{\Sigma^{0}}^{u}$ and $G_{\Sigma^{0}}^{d}$ are identical. Since the light sea quark form factors in proton are different, it will be more meaningful to compare lattice result of the light sea quark form factors in $\Sigma^0$ with that obtained from effective field theory.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Cites it as background 1 paper

What it cites · 7 sentences without a confident label

Builds on 1 paper
Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
Uses data or values from 1 paper
Compares with 1 paper
Cites as background 21 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.