REVIEW 2 cited by
International Workshop on Continual Semi-Supervised Learning: Introduction, Benchmarks and Baselines
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The aim of this paper is to formalize a new continual semi-supervised learning (CSSL) paradigm, proposed to the attention of the machine learning community via the IJCAI 2021 International Workshop on Continual Semi-Supervised Learning (CSSL-IJCAI), with the aim of raising field awareness about this problem and mobilizing its effort in this direction. After a formal definition of continual semi-supervised learning and the appropriate training and testing protocols, the paper introduces two new benchmarks specifically designed to assess CSSL on two important computer vision tasks: activity recognition and crowd counting. We describe the Continual Activity Recognition (CAR) and Continual Crowd Counting (CCC) challenges built upon those benchmarks, the baseline models proposed for the challenges, and describe a simple CSSL baseline which consists in applying batch self-training in temporal sessions, for a limited number of rounds. The results show that learning from unlabelled data streams is extremely challenging, and stimulate the search for methods that can encode the dynamics of the data stream.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Deep evolving semi-supervised anomaly detection
The paper formalizes continual semi-supervised anomaly detection and presents a VAE-based baseline with generative replay and outlier rejection, reporting AUC scores on three image datasets.
-
Anomaly detection using Diffusion-based methods
Diffusion-based reconstruction models are evaluated for image anomaly detection and are claimed to outperform classical methods, but the paper lacks the experimental detail needed to support the claim.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.