Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Hate Speech Classifiers Learn Human-Like Social Stereotypes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.14839 v1 pith:WYOUD4EP submitted 2021-10-28 cs.CL cs.CY

classification cs.CLcs.CY
keywords socialstereotypeshatespeechclassifiersannotatorsbiasesdemonstrate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Social stereotypes negatively impact individuals' judgements about different groups and may have a critical role in how people understand language directed toward minority social groups. Here, we assess the role of social stereotypes in the automated detection of hateful language by examining the relation between individual annotator biases and erroneous classification of texts by hate speech classifiers. Specifically, in Study 1 we investigate the impact of novice annotators' stereotypes on their hate-speech-annotation behavior. In Study 2 we examine the effect of language-embedded stereotypes on expert annotators' aggregated judgements in a large annotated corpus. Finally, in Study 3 we demonstrate how language-embedded stereotypes are associated with systematic prediction errors in a neural-network hate speech classifier. Our results demonstrate that hate speech classifiers learn human-like biases which can further perpetuate social inequalities when propagated at scale. This framework, combining social psychological and computational linguistic methods, provides insights into additional sources of bias in hate speech moderation, informing ongoing debates regarding fairness in machine learning.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bridging the Gap: In-Context Learning for Modeling Human Disagreement

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Across four open-source LLMs and three subjective-task datasets, in-context learning with multi-perspective prompts improves aggregated-label predictions in zero-shot, but disaggregated hard and soft label predictions...

Pith tools