Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

10 Security and Privacy Problems in Large Foundation Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.15444 v3 pith:RQEAFSLQ submitted 2021-10-28 cs.CR cs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.LG
keywords foundationmodelprivacysecuritymodelsproblemspre-trainedbook
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Foundation models--such as GPT, CLIP, and DINO--have achieved revolutionary progress in the past several years and are commonly believed to be a promising approach for general-purpose AI. In particular, self-supervised learning is adopted to pre-train a foundation model using a large amount of unlabeled data. A pre-trained foundation model is like an ``operating system'' of the AI ecosystem. Specifically, a foundation model can be used as a feature extractor for many downstream tasks with little or no labeled training data. Existing studies on foundation models mainly focused on pre-training a better foundation model to improve its performance on downstream tasks in non-adversarial settings, leaving its security and privacy in adversarial settings largely unexplored. A security or privacy issue of a pre-trained foundation model leads to a single point of failure for the AI ecosystem. In this book chapter, we discuss 10 basic security and privacy problems for the pre-trained foundation models, including six confidentiality problems, three integrity problems, and one availability problem. For each problem, we discuss potential opportunities and challenges. We hope our book chapter will inspire future research on the security and privacy of foundation models.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BESA: Boosting Encoder Stealing Attack with Perturbation Recovery

    cs.CR 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    BESA boosts encoder stealing attacks under perturbation defenses by detecting the defense and recovering clean feature vectors with a MagNet-style generator.

Pith tools