Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning to ignore: rethinking attention in CNNs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.05684 v1 pith:W5GM2SV3 submitted 2021-11-10 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords attentionlearningimagecnnsexplicitlyignorelearnparts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, there has been an increasing interest in applying attention mechanisms in Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to solve computer vision tasks. Most of these methods learn to explicitly identify and highlight relevant parts of the scene and pass the attended image to further layers of the network. In this paper, we argue that such an approach might not be optimal. Arguably, explicitly learning which parts of the image are relevant is typically harder than learning which parts of the image are less relevant and, thus, should be ignored. In fact, in vision domain, there are many easy-to-identify patterns of irrelevant features. For example, image regions close to the borders are less likely to contain useful information for a classification task. Based on this idea, we propose to reformulate the attention mechanism in CNNs to learn to ignore instead of learning to attend. Specifically, we propose to explicitly learn irrelevant information in the scene and suppress it in the produced representation, keeping only important attributes. This implicit attention scheme can be incorporated into any existing attention mechanism. In this work, we validate this idea using two recent attention methods Squeeze and Excitation (SE) block and Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM). Experimental results on different datasets and model architectures show that learning to ignore, i.e., implicit attention, yields superior performance compared to the standard approaches.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reasoning in machine vision by learning fast and slow thinking

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A dual-process vision system improves segmentation accuracy by spending more inference-time compute, using a fast predictor and a slow self-play refiner, reporting gains on cancer localisation with only 8-16 labels.

Pith tools